[quote name='mykevermin']
http://www.morganquitno.com/dang07.htm
If you actually look at the website that did the data (even if all they did is a bland-ass method that compared state averages versus the national average, which is, statistically, something that a kid with diapers on could do), you'll notice the change from previous years. That is, those "dangerous states" are moving down.
Nevertheless, you could argue, what is the difference between being the #2 and #3 most dangerous state, and you'd have a valid point.
It doesn't change, of course, that, at the very best, you're making a logically fallacious jump from "southwestern states are more dangerous" to "the crime rate is due to illegal immigrants." The data/study cited simply do not prove anything about immigration and crime, and you're asking us to take a gigantic leap of faith with you. I see a cliff ahead, so I'll keep my feet on the ground.
Now, let's go look at the FBI's Uniform Crime Reports (UCR), which the Quitno data simply polished up for you. Here's one example of illegal immigrants' contribution to the crime rate. Let's make the assumption that, since illegal immigration is a problem that most US citizens have with Mexicans and other latinos, few illegal immigrants can be catgorized as "white" or "black" (ethnic categorization of Latinos is whole can of worms for another thread).
So, if we can handle that, take a look at non-white and non-black contribution to murder rates:
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_04/offenses_reported/violent_crime/murder.html
Scroll down to table 2.5 - it lists racial contributions to murder. So, we have 68.5% of murders committed by "blacks" and "whites," and 1.7% "other." The remaining 30% are "unknown." So, we can come to several conclusions:
1) Latino contribution to the crime rate is overstated - although murder is only one kind of crime among many, they simply aren't represented as a substantial portion of the murdering population.
or,
2) The data is flawed because the US government is always horrible at classifying Latinos racially - they may be in there, but they're likely hiding amongst the "black" and "white" groups.
or,
3) You can deny it all and insist that Latinos still contribute to the crime rate, but that they're just *so good* at it that they aren't caught. :lol:
Anyway, I'm not any closer to a definitive conclusion, but I'm also a lot closer to making an argument related to race-based crime rates. I'm not going to present some hackneyed "oh, Nevada is in the south, and that's where 'messicans are, and that's why crime is high, and I'm going to totally ignore the mafia, gambling-based crime, and the geographical opportunities that a low-population density state offers when considering how dangerous it is" explanation.

[/quote]
Arizona, Nevada, Texas and California are all in the Top 12 ranked as most dangerous. This is not a coincidence that 25% of the top 12 are border states to the south.