It was a change in design by artists. Longer ears became more comfortable and iconic.I read somewhere long ago that his ears were short in the beginning of his career but as the years past and he gained more experience his ears were made taller.
such a flat chest, shoulda gotten Munn
You have issues.
We have been waiting YEARS for a film to feature Wonder Woman...and now we get it.......but instead of a Lynda Carter type or Adrianne Palick (which most of you don't know she was suppose to be the new WW in the TV show a few years back that NBC shot a pilot but never went ahead and released itThis thread is getting really mysoginistic and quite disgusting in its objectifying of Gale Gadot.
Some of you really need to take a step back.
Nah. Comic book fans have the right to be upset. She can't act and she looks nothing like WW. Just like we have the right to be pissed about zombieland magician as Luthor. Ugh.This thread is getting really mysoginistic and quite disgusting in its objectifying of Gale Gadot.
Some of you really need to take a step back.
Because NBC realized it was a steaming pile of crap.which most of you don't know she was suppose to be the new WW in the TV show a few years back that NBC shot a pilot but never went ahead and released it![]()
I don't understand why they never released it online at least.Because NBC realized it was a steaming pile of crap.
http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/teamt/nash/specials/33934-wonder-woman-2011
After watching the link above, I imagine they pulled an ET and dumped it all in a landfill, hoping everyone forgets about it. What aI don't understand why they never released it online at least.
Nah, you have no right to be pissed. I'm a comic book fan and I'm not passing any judgements yet because close mindedness is lame.Nah. Comic book fans have the right to be upset. She can't act and she looks nothing like WW. Just like we have the right to be pissed about zombieland magician as Luthor. Ugh.
Except it received a huge thrashing from those that did review it. Seriously, in the pantheon of comic book adaptations it is right up there with Batman & Robin, Superman IV, and the 90's Fantastic Four as the most savaged film/series. As soon as it got leaked online it became radioactive.Releasing it online would have been a good idea as it would have cost the studio very little money. Who knows....if they did release it and got the proper feedback, they could have retooled it.....heck I would not be surprised if a network tries again once the movie comes out.
That's cute. I'll go ahead and keep my doubts about a woman who looks nothing like, nor can ever look like Wonder Woman. Who also, by the way, can't act for shit. So you can leave your "close mindedness" BS to yourself. Seeing as not being able to act, is a HUGE detriment already, I'll stand by my statement.Nah, you have no right to be pissed. I'm a comic book fan and I'm not passing any judgements yet because close mindedness is lame.
The Dark Knight trilogy had a bunch of actors like Tom Hardy that didn't look like their comic book counterparts and those movies were good. Jesse Eisenberg is a solid actor, so I don't mind that choice. I haven't seen anything with Gal Gadot, but even if she hasnt been able to act in the past, she might do well in this movie. What's the point of being so negative about a movie before it even comes out? Your bitching won't change anything about it, so why not just judge the movie when it comes out?That's cute. I'll go ahead and keep my doubts about a woman who looks nothing like, nor can ever look like Wonder Woman. Who also, by the way, can't act for shit. So you can leave your "close mindedness" BS to yourself. Seeing as not being able to act, is a HUGE detriment already, I'll stand by my statement.
Anddiscount Michael Cera for Luthor. Get a real actor like Bryan Cranston or Mark Strong for the role. Hell, I'll take 55 year old Clancy Brown as a reprisal to his role!
They can be upset but when it's turned into outright objectification like this thread has it turns into something else. The complaints about Jesse Eisenberg haven't been because of his body. No one, until you just did now has complained about Gadot's acting ability, it has all been about how she looks, from her structure to her bust size. It started out as amusing but now it's just getting to be a gross, objectifying, judgmental statement about Gadot.Nah. Comic book fans have the right to be upset. She can't act and she looks nothing like WW. Just like we have the right to be pissed about zombieland magician as Luthor. Ugh.
They can be upset but when it's turned into outright objectification like this thread has it turns into something else. The complaints about Jesse Eisenberg haven't been because of his body. No one, until you just did now has complained about Gadot's acting ability, it has all been about how she looks, from her structure to her bust size. It started out as amusing but now it's just getting to be a gross, objectifying, judgmental statement about Gadot.
I know a number of Batman/comic fans, and they're all at least mildly annoyed by Tom Hardy as Bane, because of Hardy's (lack of) stature.The Dark Knight trilogy had a bunch of actors like Tom Hardy that didn't look like their comic book counterparts and those movies were good. Jesse Eisenberg is a solid actor, so I don't mind that choice. I haven't seen anything with Gal Gadot, but even if she hasnt been able to act in the past, she might do well in this movie. What's the point of being so negative about a movie before it even comes out? Your bitching won't change anything about it, so why not just judge the movie when it comes out?
They all generally like the movie, too, and typically Hardy's performance. Just not Hardy's stature.I am sure a lot of comic fans didn't like Hardy, but the movie itself was still quite good. I trekked to the comic book store to buy every issue of Knightfall back in '93-'94. Would've liked someone else to play Bane. Still enjoyed the flick, though.
Who exactly would they have picked? Sylvestor Stallone? Jason Statham? Ahnold? A WWE wrestler/MMA fighter?
Same reactions as the Heath Ledger casting got, before he put fourth the best comic book performance of all time and won an Oscar in the process.Nah. Comic book fans have the right to be upset. She can't act and she looks nothing like WW. Just like we have the right to be pissed about zombieland magician as Luthor. Ugh.
Mark Hammil > Heath LedgerSame reactions as the Heath Ledger casting got, before he put fourth the best comic book performance of all time and won an Oscar in the process.
what theBatman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice...ugh...
It's a marketing gimmick. The average joe won't think it's a Batman/Superman film if their names aren't in the title. At least, that's what the PR people are thinking.what the?
They actually kept the Vs??!?!?! What's wrong with World's Finest????????????????
Brian Cranston > Gary Oldman with that logic.Mark Hammil > Heath Ledger
Uhh...wat?Because Scarlet Johansson made a horrible Black Widow because she didn't have a D-Cup.
but her ass made up for it.....yes I will even over look the LACK OF an accentUhh...wat?
Black Widow only had a Russian accent in the Ultimate Avengers OAVs.but her ass made up for it.....yes I will even over look the LACK OF an accent
I remember not hating the idea. I hated the first image of his face. Looked terrible.Same reactions as the Heath Ledger casting got, before he put fourth the best comic book performance of all time and won an Oscar in the process.
I was too young to know that. Meaning to join in on the hatred. But at that point, they didn't have a real BIG TIME Batman movie.I'm sure if I didn't already mention this, someone else must have...but the same thing happened with Keaton playing Batman. WB received thousands of complaint letters (days before the interwebs!). Keaton didn't look the part, and he was a comic actor. Batman '89 turned out just fine. Let's just see what happens.
Voice wise. Yes. Obviously.Mark Hammil > Heath Ledger
Yes. Voice wise. Again.Brian Cranston > Gary Oldman with that logic.
Don't these movies follow the Ultimate series though? Not that she constantly needs the accent though. Im just saying.Black Widow only had a Russian accent in the Ultimate Avengers OAVs.
While I agree with your line of thinking, oddly enough, they didn't employ it for the first movie. Sure, MOST people know that Superman is the Man of Steel. But some don't. Odd that they went the route of leaving Superman out of the title. They also could have easily called this new move "Batman/Superman: World's Finest."It's a marketing gimmick. The average joe won't think it's a Batman/Superman film if their names aren't in the title. At least, that's what the PR people are thinking.
The movies are a mix of the 616, Ultimate, and various animated universes. And Ultimate Avengers OAVs were just the 616 Avengers in Ultimate designs.Don't these movies follow the Ultimate series though? Not that she constantly needs the accent though. Im just saying.
Goyer would probably ask if you've ever been laid if you suggested that.I prefer they did what Justice League did and just call him J'honn.
This.Mark Hammil > Heath Ledger