[quote name='rpnguyen']for gaming you might want a plasma. response time is far superior to an lcd's (which is highly important for gaming), no worrying about refresh rates (again an importance to gaming, lcds had to develop 120hz tech in order to deal with blur, plasmas don't have this problem), better viewing angles (not as important unless you're NOT going to be sitting straight-away from the TV or maybe you have friends over to watch tv/play games). Color levels and black especially on a plasma are also superior to an LCD's (the difference can be minimized through meticulous calibration), but that's usually a film-watching point and not a gaming one.
drawbacks for plasma are that they draw more power than comparable lcds (size-wise), possibility of burn-in (although tech has improved to the point that you have to be ABUSING your tv to get burn-in), and bigger size (have you SEEN the new LED samsungs...amazingly thin). also probably the biggest thing is that they are more EXPENSIVE than comparable lcds.
I have a Panasonic Viera G10 42" plasma in the family room (~$900 when I got it this past summer...maybe cheaper now, a really good tv that i recommend), and I use a Samsung T260HD LCD tv as my desktop monitor ($250 which i would pay again for it).[/QUOTE]
plasmas, currently panasonic's are NOT more expensive than comparable lcd's
youve got it backwards.