[quote name='hpv']No, that doesn't make any
ing sense. For that to even be in the ballpark of correct he'd have to intend to say that they are giving more cashback now and then after more cashback it goes back to the usual cashback. That'd be an incomplete sentence, which I would probably let slide but it still wouldn't be proper. So no, English is
not "cool like that."
Are you also the type to argue that you really meant "could care less" when that isn't the meaning of the idiom in any place or time but you are too embarrassed to admit that you (like many people) simply learned it incorrectly and actually meant to say "couldn't care less"?
Come correct or gtfo. Ignorance is fine, everyone is ignorant at many points in their lives (that's why we have learning), but making excuses for it is stupid.[/QUOTE]
It's not really the place, except the internet is always the place. So.
I don't think you have a firm grasp of English. It's a mutt language, it's rules are of a prisonbreak school. There was never a golden age when it's/its base was pure, nor will there be. It's not like latin, nor was it ever, regardless of clowns who forbid splitting infinitives or question the use of pluperfect subjunctive tenses. I mean Christ, there isn't even a way to express gender vagueness. We have to use nonsense like "he or she" - how stupid is that. English is a poor, broken language better at obstructing conversation than eliciting proper dialogue. Spelling bees? Homonyms? Silent letters? Are you really trying to defend a language that is making a fool out of its users?
I say tear the whole thing down and create something where a person isn't tricked into some than/then idiocy. Understanding is the ultimate goal of any language, otherwise it fails.