[quote name='BigT']The thing is that if you're white and you so much as lay a hand on a black, you run the risk of being charged with a hate crime... that would be great assault + hate crime = bad times. So really fighting them would not be worth it...[/QUOTE]
Again, let me stress that this is dead wrong. It's akin to me saying that doctors just look at you and make shit up. It's simplified, wrong, and overlooks the methodological parameters that go into diagnoses, no?
Hate crimes are thoroughly supported with evidence in order to designate them as such. It's not perfect, but hey, guess what? All scientific fields, even yours, yield inaccurate diagnoses and false positives. It's not demonstrably true, nor is it a fair criticism, to suggest that false positives/negatives happen more in the social sciences.
The FBI states, when collecting data for its hate crime statistics report (annual): "The FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program collects data regarding criminal offenses that are motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender’s bias against a race, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity/national origin, or disability and are committed against persons, property, or society. Because motivation is subjective, it is sometimes difficult to know with certainty whether a crime resulted from the offender’s bias. Moreover, the presence of bias alone does not necessarily mean that a crime can be considered a hate crime. Only when law enforcement investigation reveals sufficient evidence to lead a reasonable and prudent person to conclude that the offender’s actions were motivated, in whole or in part, by his or her bias, should an incident be reported as a hate crime."
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/hc2007/methodology.htm
So laying a hand on a black person if you're white is insufficient. If you call that person a '$$$$er,' and you happen to be wearing a "Skrewdriver" shirt and perhaps have a copy of "Mein Kampf" sitting in your nearby-parked car (just an absurd hypothetical), then you're talking about a different scenario. They collect evidence from crime scenes as best as possible and make empirical guesses based on that evidence. Just like physicians' diagnoses are best guesses that are based upon a combination of empirically-attainable criteria.