I know Msut77 has me on the ignore list but this takes the case for clueless post of the day. I wonder how he would feel if someone started beating him in the face in a dark alley at night without another soul in sight. Would he consider that life threatening? I would say it is a possibility as you do not know what the strangers are capable of.Bloody nose = life threatening?
Maybe he used his hands to block the blows? Did GZ mention if he returned any blows back to TM?Martin had absolutely zero defensive wounds on his body, which indicates that Zimmerman made no effort to resort to non-lethal methods of "defending himself" before going for his gun and pulling the trigger. For a guy who was a former bouncer, this is pretty glaring. That is a critical blow to his defense claims.
I know Msut77 has me on the ignore list but this takes the case for clueless post of the day. I wonder how he would feel if someone started beating him in the face in a dark alley at night without another soul in sight. Would he consider that life threatening? I would say it is a possibility as you do not know what the strangers are capable of.
Maybe he used his hands to block the blows? Did GZ mention if he returned any blows back to TM?
He had zero traces of Zimmerman's DNA on his hands (the only place any showed up on his person was a spot of blood on the bottom of his undershirt, and like I theorized before, that likely got there after Zimmerman shot him, got on top and turned him over), and the only abrasion on his hand was a small one on his ring finger knuckle. The medical examiner who performed his autopsy said it was too small to even measure, didn't bleed or even break the skin, and that he could have gotten it hours before the encounter even happened. Besides his finger and the gunshot wound, Martin had absolutely no other injuries (cuts, bruises, etc.). Hell, you could make the argument that Martin didn't even lay a finger on him.
When you hit someone it does significant damage to your hands. The 25-30 punches Zimmerman claimed Martin threw would have left his hands very bruised, battered, and covered in blood. They'd leave a hell of a lot of than what basically amounted to a tiny scratch on his finger.
Then how did Zimmerman get hurt? Didn't the police come by soon after 911 calls were made? Do you think he decided to do this to himself in the meantime? Or am I missing something?He had zero traces of Zimmerman's DNA on his hands (the only place any showed up on his person was a spot of blood on the bottom of his undershirt, and like I theorized before, that likely got there after Zimmerman shot him, got on top and turned him over), and the only abrasion on his hand was a small one on his ring finger knuckle. The medical examiner who performed his autopsy said it was too small to even measure, didn't bleed or even break the skin, and that he could have gotten it hours before the encounter even happened. Besides his finger and the gunshot wound, Martin had absolutely no other injuries (cuts, bruises, etc.). Hell, you could make the argument that Martin didn't even lay a finger on him.
When you hit someone it does significant damage to your hands. The 25-30 punches Zimmerman claimed Martin threw would have left his hands very bruised, battered, and covered in blood. They'd leave a hell of a lot of than what basically amounted to a tiny scratch on his finger.
They examined TM hands but what about Zimmerman? Did they examine his body that night or sometime soon after? Did they find any blood or scraped off skin on the concrete at the scene?Hell Zimmerman could have gotten those injuries shaving his head, but if you wanna stick with it happening during the confrontation, he probably slipped and scraped his head on the concrete. Having your head slammed over and over would leave massive cranial damage, and he definitely would have gone to the hospital. All the PS who testified said Zimmerman declined any any all offers to go to the hospital, and the very next day he seemed more concerend with not missing work that what transpired the night before.
That would still leave noticeable trauma on his hands. Remember, Zimmerman is attesting to having taken a brutal beatdown. He said Martin punched him repeatedly, slammed his head into the concrete dozens of times, covered his mouth, and went for his gun. None of the evidence supports his story.
it's not about waiting until injuries are life threatening in this case. Its's about how his injuries are inconsistent with his story. I'm not gonna repeat everything I've typed from testimony over the last few weeks, but absolutely none of the forensic evidence supports any part of Zimmerman's story of being brutally beaten by Trayvon Martin.You need not wait until the injuries become life-threatening to defend yourself. Once your injuries are life-threatening, you ability to defend yourself is greatly diminished.
I believe we have a bingo.it's not about waiting until injuries are life threatening in this case. Its's about how his injuries are inconsistent with his story. I'm not gonna repeat everything I've typed from testimony over the last few weeks, but absolutely none of the forensic evidence supports any part of Zimmerman's story of being brutally beaten by Trayvon Martin.
Here are some of the most prominent inconsistencies:
Where the confrontation happened
In his first recorded interview with police the night of the Feb. 26 shooting, Zimmerman said Trayvon popped out at him from "the bushes."
By the time he re-enacted the shooting less than 24 hours later, however, Zimmerman was much more precise, and the spot he pointed out had no bushes nearby.
As he walked police through what happened where, he said Trayvon approached him from his left rear and at a spot near the intersection of two sidewalks.
What Trayvon said
In that first taped interview with Sanford police Investigator Doris Singleton, Zimmerman said that when he and Trayvon came face to face on that sidewalk, Trayvon said, "What the [expletive][is] your problem, homey?"
During the next 24 hours, Zimmerman's version of what Trayvon said would change slightly, becoming less offensive with each telling.
In another interview later that night, he told Investigator Chris Serino that Trayvon said, "You got a problem?"
During the re-enactment the next afternoon, he told police that Trayvon yelled, "Yo, you got a problem?"
Also, a 16-year-old Miami girl told prosecutors she heard something different. She said she was on the phone with Trayvon at the time and heard him say, "What are you following me for?"
Dispatcher asked him to find Trayvon
After first spotting Trayvon and dialing a nonemergency police number, Zimmerman parked his truck while he talked with the dispatcher, asking that an officer come to the scene.
While still on the line, he drove a short distance down the street before parking again.
Why did he move his truck?
During the re-enactment the day after the shooting, Zimmerman told detectives it was because he had lost sight of the 17-year-old, and the dispatcher asked him to find him.
A review of Zimmerman's recorded call with the dispatcher, though, shows there was no such request.
Did he follow Trayvon?
In his call to police before the shooting, Zimmerman can be heard huffing and puffing as if he had been running or walking fast.
"Are you following him?" the dispatcher asked.
"Yeah," Zimmerman answered.
"OK, we don't need you to do that," the dispatcher said.
"OK," Zimmerman said.
But after the shooting, he offered a different reason for getting out of his truck. Serino pressed him for an explanation three days later.
I was "just going in the same direction he was," Zimmerman said. He had exited his truck, he said, to get a street address for authorities.
"Did you pursue the kid? Did you want to catch him?" Serino asked.
"No," said Zimmerman.
Serino challenged him further: "How do you not know the three streets in your neighborhood [where] you've been living for three years?"
Zimmerman replied that he had a bad memory and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Other inconsistencies
Investigators also pointed out to Zimmerman in a Feb. 29 interrogation several other discrepancies, but he did not clear them up:
•He had said that during their struggle, Trayvon covered Zimmerman's nose and mouth with his hands, but in a recorded 911 call from a neighbor in which someone can be heard screaming for help, none of the cries sound muffled.
•Zimmerman had injuries but not ones that matched the severity of the attack he described, according to Serino. If Trayvon had been banging Zimmerman's head on the sidewalk, the Neighborhood Watch volunteer should have had skull fractures, not just cuts, Serino said.
•There were no defensive wounds on Zimmerman's hands and just one small scrape on a finger of Trayvon's left hand, Serino said — little evidence of life-and-death struggle.
Do you mind if I ask to whom are you referring when you say "those people"? And I don't think GZ will walk. If he does, I imagine whichever group you're referring to will do a lot more than riot.You think those people will riot when GZ is let go free?
I think that's where it will go too, but considering the trace amounts, prosecution could probably argue that he was more calm compared to paranoid, or whatever. I really want to hear what the Dr. says about the effect of trace amounts of THC though.I think they're gonna try to prove that Martin was paranoid that night, despite the face that he only had trace amounts of THC in his system. He could have had his last smoke upward to two weeks before the shooting.
I think that's where it will go too, but considering the trace amounts, prosecution could probably argue that he was more calm compared to paranoid, or whatever. I really want to hear what the Dr. says about the effect of trace amounts of THC though.
Question:I think they're gonna try to prove that Martin was paranoid that night, despite the face that he only had trace amounts of THC in his system. He could have had his last smoke upward to two weeks before the shooting.
I'm sure someone could challenge these but they would be banned for doing so over there.EDIT: Someone over on the SA forums was kind enough to compile all of the inconsistencies from Zimmerman's various accounts of what happened that evening:
Ummm...no.I'm sure someone could challenge these but they would be banned for doing so over there.
And I'm sure they'd win a gold metal in the Mental Gymnastics competition.I'm sure someone could challenge these but they would be banned for doing so over there.
You're speaking of Zimmerman's possibly broken nose? No one can say for sure if it was broken because GZ never went to get an official diagnosis. All you can say for sure it that it was bloody an injured. The fact that the swelling went down that very same night leads me to believe that it was, but I'm not a medical examiner, so I can only speculate.So I've read the trial summaries a few of the posters in this thread have offered, and I gotta tell ya, they're pretty much wildly inconsistent with what is happening based on the video I've seen. We're all guilty of putting our spin on things, but in the bits I've seen, the analysis of attorneys is, "OK defense, you won. Just wrap the case up and your guy is off for murder. Maybe he'll get manslaughter, but after the defense's medical examiner testified and ripped to shreds the State's rambling, poorly prepared examiner, you got this."
The burden is so high for the State, and the questions surrounding it all are so great, that I've got to think any reasonable jury would say that reasonable doubt has been established. Yes, I think by following the kid, Zimmerman put himself in a position to set this all in motion, but it sounds like it's been clearly established that Martin was on top, Zimmerman clearly had injuries (Purple Flame, my man, I keep on trying to get my brain wrapped around how you overlook rather significant injuries to the face), and the defense's medical examiner clearly explained how ballistics show that the shirt would be hanging off of Martin, thus the 2-4 inches from the body. Whether it's as the State contends, it could have been because Martin was sitting up to get away, or as Zimmerman does, he was catching an ass-whooping from the guy on top, we can at least safely assume Martin was on top. Beyond that, there's a lot of theory and doubt.
Not crazy about Zimmerman creating a bad situation, then making it worse, but dang, as much of a creep as he is, I have lots and lots of doubts that in his mind, and under the legal definition, he didn't act in self-defense.
Broken, bloodied, I'm certain no doc either, in fact I've never broken my nose so I don't have good personal experience there. (I have broken a couple of noses playing basketball, but that's the closest I've come).You're speaking of Zimmerman's possibly broken nose? No one can say for sure if it was broken because GZ never went to get an official diagnosis. All you can say for sure it that it was bloody an injured. The fact that the swelling went down that very same night leads me to believe that it was, but I'm not a medical examiner, so I can only speculate.
His wounds were minor and didn't require treatment from a hospital. If unarmed Person-A punches armed Person-B, Person-B can assume that they're about to die and rightfully kill Person-A? Is that how the law works in Florida?Broken, bloodied, I'm certain no doc either, in fact I've never broken my nose so I don't have good personal experience there. (I have broken a couple of noses playing basketball, but that's the closest I've come).
The blood and bruising on the back of the head too. I mean, indisputably, clearly he was bruised and bloodied. The question is whether it was as painful, scary, and life threatening as Zimmerman claims it was. But he didn't get those by falling down the stairs. He caught a bit of an ass whooping is what it appears, and caught it from a guy who was at some point on top of him.
Well, let's be clear: the head is a very vascular part of the body. This means that for all intents and purposes, the head is a gigantic blood-gorged sponge in a thin wrapper. This is why popping a zit will bleed more than a paper cut, which also explains the "large" blood streaks coming from Zimmerman's head. Saying that he would've bleed more if he cut his head shaving is no exaggeration. The fact that Martin's hands and wrists had no damage beyond the superficialest of scrapes under one knuckle doesn't jive with any of Zimmerman's accounts of that night. Judging from the numerous occasions that he's been less than honest about things related to the case, I have no problem with believing that Zimmerman is being less than honest with his various accounts. Especially when it comes to Martin being able to talk while his heart was filling his lungs with blood according to Dr. Bao.Broken, bloodied, I'm certain no doc either, in fact I've never broken my nose so I don't have good personal experience there. (I have broken a couple of noses playing basketball, but that's the closest I've come).
The blood and bruising on the back of the head too. I mean, indisputably, clearly he was bruised and bloodied. The question is whether it was as painful, scary, and life threatening as Zimmerman claims it was. But he didn't get those by falling down the stairs. He caught a bit of an ass whooping is what it appears, and caught it from a guy who was at some point on top of him.
Yes, this is pretty much how it works.His wounds were minor and didn't require treatment from a hospital. If unarmed Person-A punches armed Person-B, Person-B can assume that they're about to die and rightfully kill Person-A? Is that how the law works in Florida?
If the law is that, you don't have to wait for life-threatening injury to occur but instead have a fear of life-threatening injury, this law is pretty much greater than everything else, right?
In Florida, If somebody looks at me strangely, I can then be afraid for my life (or afraid that they're about to cause life-threatening injury) and lawfully kill them?
I don't think I said any of that. I haven't been in a fight with someone on top of me, so I don't really have much to create a theory on how I would react. I've trained a good bit in grappling, so if I'm on the ground, I'd actually feel far less threatened than if it were a stand up fight. If Martin was able to bloody Zimmerman's nose and back of his head by looking at him, Superman is a pussy. That would be a real super power.His wounds were minor and didn't require treatment from a hospital. If unarmed Person-A punches armed Person-B, Person-B can assume that they're about to die and rightfully kill Person-A? Is that how the law works in Florida?
If the law is that, you don't have to wait for life-threatening injury to occur but instead have a fear of life-threatening injury, this law is pretty much greater than everything else, right?
In Florida, If somebody looks at me strangely, I can then be afraid for my life (or afraid that they're about to cause life-threatening injury) and lawfully kill them?
Please don't feel like this, I wouldn't say it was accurate.I feel like you're looking at this emotionally rather than analytically.
This isn't accurate, GZ has confessed to following TM in his car before getting out of his car and following TM on foot.And before somebody says, well than he should have stayed in his car, well we don't know who confronted who for sure, perhaps GZ went looking a little turned around and TM came back and confronted him or maybe GZ caught TM hiding, even though TM had a lead and was only 70 meters or so from his place, it's possible he still hid.
Fair enough. My apologies. The Dr. Bao guy has come under quite a bit of fire for several of his medical opinions that other docs think were wildly inaccurate, so I'm not giving him much credibility to him considering several docs (a couple not associated with the trial at all) have major concerns over his analysis, but you're right, I'd definitely expect to see more signs of damage to Martin's hands. The question still remains though, how did his nose get bloodied, if the prosecution started off telling us Zimmerman was on top until that was debunked, what else are they wrong on, and according to Florida law, with these things considered, did Zimmerman legally defend himself, or did he kill a guy he was in an altercation with unnecessarily. No pun intended, but the jury is still out on that one.Please don't feel like this, I wouldn't say it was accurate.
The lack of GZ's DNA on TM, the lack of relevant wounds on TM's hands, and Dr. Rao's detailing of GZ's "very minor, very little" abrasions - coupled with the fact that swelling on his nose had alleviated in just a few hours - these facts are important to my analysis.
Right, which is also why I agree that Murder 2 is beyond ridiculous, but that doesn't mean that he gets an automatic acquittal like pro-Zimmers idiotically think because Murder 2 includes all lesser charges like Manslaughter in the state of FL. What you're describing is exactly what needs to be addressed for the Manslaughter conviction and in the state of FL, all you need is reasonable doubt that Zimmerman is telling the truth and/or instigated the confrontation.Doh, whoops, posted right when you quoted me. You're absolutely right. I don't trust Zimmerman's entire account, head and face injuries bleed like crazy, and what looks nasty and painful could very well be the least significant of injuries.
That's where the mentality of the person being hit comes in, the series of events, and whether they feel their life is in danger. Which is debatable, thus the reason we're all following a trial about it.
No I really mean Dr. Rao, the female doctor called by the prosecution last week...(or maybe the week before last?). The punch in question is a point of speculation for me too though, although I have a hard time buying the "GZ was following him and then lost sight of TM and then GZ started to leave but TM appeared behind him and punched GZ" theory.Fair enough. My apologies. The Dr. Bao guy has come under quite a bit of fire for several of his medical opinions that other docs think were wildly inaccurate, so I'm not giving him much credibility to him considering several docs (a couple not associated with the trial at all) have major concerns over his analysis, but you're right, I'd definitely expect to see more signs of damage to Martin's hands. The question still remains though, how did his nose get bloodied, if the prosecution started off telling us Zimmerman was on top until that was debunked, what else are they wrong on, and according to Florida law, with these things considered, did Zimmerman legally defend himself, or did he kill a guy he was in an altercation with unnecessarily. No pun intended, but the jury is still out on that one.
And at a higher legal level, this is fascinating. If the State can allege the highest of crimes, and include multiple less severe crimes for the same action, it seems a little like playing "guess a number between 1-5" and giving them four tries. But that's just my rant on the legal practice of charging until something finally sticks.Right, which is also why I agree that Murder 2 is beyond ridiculous, but that doesn't mean that he gets an automatic acquittal like pro-Zimmers idiotically think because Murder 2 includes all lesser charges like Manslaughter in the state of FL. What you're describing is exactly what needs to be addressed for the Manslaughter conviction and in the state of FL, all you need is reasonable doubt that Zimmerman is telling the truth and/or instigated the confrontation.
Ah, gotcha. I didn't see anything by her. I saw Bao, then the defense's medical examiner from yesterday or two days ago. Then the docs that disagree with Bao's analysis and agreed with the defense's, were some guys on CNN (I know doh, I'm still watching some of that crap! haa)No I really mean Dr. Rao, the female doctor called by the prosecution last week...(or maybe the week before last?). The punch in question is a point of speculation for me too though, although I have a hard time buying the "GZ was following him and then lost sight of TM and then GZ started to leave but TM appeared behind him and punched GZ" theory.