"Brown doesn't know how it works" OTT

Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote name='Moxio']I did. :cool:

He leaves on Friday.[/QUOTE]

Where's he going, and what's he majoring in, again?

It better not be bio. :puke:
 
[quote name='Liquid 2']Where's he going, and what's he majoring in, again?

It better not be bio. :puke:[/QUOTE]

Bio. :cool:


Nah, neuroscience. Vanderbilt.
 
Whenever biology labs are cookin' bacteria, it always smells like the most heinous chicken noodle soup.

Heinous, mostly, because it smells slightly good.
 
[quote name='zewone']Which is bullshit. I've tagged like 3 things, ever. Never been banned.

Cheapy is so wrong about that one, but I don't care.[/quote]Obviously you do care or you wouldn't be upset. I've been giving direct and clear instructions on this, so isn't my call.

[quote name='Brak']Alright. I'm sure that you still have that Notepad file of tags, and who tagged what. Could you please PM me a few of the alleged "irrelevant tags" that I allegedly added to numerous threads?[/quote]It was a notepad file of thread links to make sure were taken care of later. No specific tags, no names. The file is long since deleted or I'd share it with you.

Okay, this is a screencap of what we see when we put our cursor over the tags in the tag edit screen. The screencap removes my cursor, but you can see the notation that shows up when I had the cursor over "budgefoot." Mak, hope you don't mind being the guinea pig. If you do, I'll delete the image.

tagscu9.jpg
 
[quote name='guinaevere']Obviously you do care or you wouldn't be upset. I've been giving direct and clear instructions on this, so isn't my call.

It was a notepad file of thread links to make sure were taken care of later. No specific tags, no names. The file is long since deleted or I'd share it with you.

Okay, this is a screencap of what we see when we put our cursor over the tags in the tag edit screen. The screencap removes my cursor, but you can see the notation that shows up when I had the cursor over "budgefoot." Mak, hope you don't mind being the guinea pig. If you do, I'll delete the image.

tagscu9.jpg
[/QUOTE]

Photoshopped ;)
 
Brak, the tags have been identifiable since at least after the second week of the softlaunch.

[quote name='JimmieMac']P.S. I never tagged a thread. I just got lumped in with the Usual Suspects for a one way train to Tagschwitz.[/quote]Never tagged a blog, have you?

[quote name='Brak']She said she made a Notepad file, or a spreadsheet, or whatever, of who tagged what. I think that was a bluff, and she dodged it.[/quote]A bluff? About what?
 
[quote name='Liquid 2']Nice, nice.


I hope he/his parents like debt. :/[/QUOTE]

Nah, he has a really good financial package. Actual out of pocket costs will probably be about $10K a year.

What about you? You borrowing money to attend UT?
 
Maklershed has to make tags to propel himself out of the basement. His current gimmick is wearing thin. Like his hair.

And for you kids looking to come up with a new image for a web forum, hitching your wagon as BFF to the chubby kid with bad skin isn't the way to get you on the marquee.
 
So, if mods could always see who tagged what, then why did I get banned? I only tagged the GGT and OTT.

And that's why I'm trying to figure out if it was all a bluff, or what, because I only tagged those threads.

They just nixed the usual suspects, is all, in case Gabe & Tycho or Major Nelson were to read the boards, that way they wouldn't see "unsavory" tags. :nottalking:
 
Blogs aren't threads. Correct your line of questioning, if you think you're gonna get over on me you better have your shit straight.
 
[quote name='Moxio']Nah, he has a really good financial package. Actual out of pocket costs will probably be about $10K a year.

What about you? You borrowing money to attend UT?[/QUOTE]

That kicks ass. If the numbers I googled are right, they're shaving $35k off his costs a year. :cool:


And nope.

I know dorms aren't feasible next year though, since they're too expensive and are really only beneficial year one, so I need to start saving for my own place/get some scholarships so I can reallocate money.
 
[quote name='becuzimbrown']Brak, didn't you make "budge judy?"[/QUOTE]
Of course.
 
[quote name='Brak']Was that feature in existence before the sweep of banishments?[/quote]Yes. It may have been since the soft launch but it was discovered and we were notified about the second week after the softlaunch (may have been even before that).
 
[quote name='guinaevere']Yes. It may have been since the soft launch but it was discovered and we were notified about the second week after the softlaunch (may have been even before that).[/QUOTE]
I guess I have to take your word for it.

Go back and read that same post, though; it's edited.
 
[quote name='guinaevere']Obviously you do care or you wouldn't be upset. I've been giving direct and clear instructions on this, so isn't my call.
[/QUOTE]

I'm not upset because I miss my tagging abilities, I'm upset about how this site is run.

I'm not asking you for any help; I know you have it in for me and anyone else who tries to have fun at the expense of others.
 
[quote name='guinaevere']I dont have photoshop. Aren't the atrocities I attempt with mspaint bad enough?[/QUOTE]

I always thought they were lovely.
 
[quote name='munch']You know how.[/QUOTE]
PM me your address, son.

I should be able to send out the money tomorrow or Friday.
 
[quote name='JimmieMac']Blogs aren't threads.[/quote]Okay. Not sure what that's to do with it. But Jimmie, I'll give you that; blogs are not threads.


But tags is tags.

Correct your line of questioning, if you think you're gonna get over on me you better have your shit straight.
Click to expand...
You gonna be like that and you can polish your own dang silverware.
 
We should probably stop this tagging discussion or Cheapy is gonna show up soon and ram us in the ass, slowly.... one by one until eventually everyone has been banned or is completely broken.

I am just kidding, but seriously, I don't want that to happen.
 
[quote name='FriskyTanuki']Teddy Roosevelt named one of his sons Kermit? :lol:[/QUOTE]

Kermit had a Kermit Jr., who brought back the Shah in 1953.
 
You don't do shit to warrant getting banned, which means you're also unfunny and uninteresting and your posts aren't worth shit.

But yet you still take up space. Good job.
 
Jobbercho's gimmick is refreshing.

If memory serves me right, the whole "I'm posting in the OTT about how I hate the OTT" gimmick is untraversed territory.
 
budge, be quiet when adults are talking. Didn't they teach you that in your MILF taught home school? Pretend your Gammy's on the phone renewing her meds, sit there and shut the fuck up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top