[quote name='gaelan']soooo...for example, shrike you "reserved"
a game for someone for almost a week or so. at the end of the week they pm you saying nevermind but thanks for holding it temporarily. does this cancellation warrant a neg?[/quote]
As I've done this frequently for people, and ask them periodically about their intentions, IMHO, not this wouldn't warrant a negative, since no money has exchanged hands. Again, IMHO, others may think differently.
[quote name='gaelan']salso, is there a way to retract negatives if both parties agree. say i neg you for backing out of a alleged deal, and you neg me back claiming that you ignored pm explaining situation. is there anyway for each party to cancel feedback? it just seems that if we open up a can of worms for "supposed to pay/trade deals" then negs are gonna be flying all over the place.[/quote]
I'm guessing you're thinking along the lines of eBay's mutual feedback withdrawal? Again, IMHO, anything that is that flaming back and forth should have someone else's involvement, such as myself, and see where the situation works itself out to be. Negatives should only be used for really

ed up situations, and the only negatives that were attempted to be carried forward were the ones that were already in existance. No one that had a negative carried their feedback forward, and I thought that wasn't fair to the other parties that left them. All the negatives I saw had valid reasons behind them and I contacted all the OP's in question and asked them to have their negatives left in the old system.
[quote name='gaelan'] I think everyone on the board should handle their inventory accordingly. If someone like shrike says he would like me to reserve a copy of whatever for him, then i will for an agreed amount of time within reason. if a new CAG asks the same thing, i might give him a couple of days at most, but if another opportunity arises after that to sell/trade then i'm taking it without asking the first CAG if he plans on doing the deal. do i deserve a neg for selling to the CAG who was able to commit to the deal first? IMO no.[/quote]
I queue up want lists behind items that have more than one person looking at it, and do it as first in (PM or post), first dibs. They have right of refusal, and then it goes to the next person. They get a couple of days to sit on it, then they get a PM as a reminder, with the fact that other people are looking at the same item. Usually jogs them into action to buy or to back out. Occasionally has caused a small bit of hard feelings, though nothing that I'd be worried about generating a negative. So far, it's worked for me. It's your responsibility to keep in touch with people you're working on deals with, and if they repeatedly don't respond to PM's about the issue, and they've been online for a reasonable amount of time, then it's your perogative to do what you want on that. Could it get someone pissed off at you? Yes, it could, though it's your issue to deal with. IF they leave you a flaming negative over the issue, then that's something that needs to be addressed.
[quote name='gaelan'] May have to institute some ToS
First come first served. No shirts no shoes no service. Money talks bullshit pms walk. Put up or shut up.[/QUOTE]
Any issues like that are ones you need to work out with your prospective clients. Very important to keep all the PM's relavent to the situation on-hand so that digging them up when needed isn't an issue. The PM download feature is perfect for this.