[quote name='Crono51']Correct me if my math is wrong (percentages are rounded), but...
2008 total = 19.5% of 2007's total
2009 total = 31% of 2008's total
2010 total = 7% of 2009's total
This further cements my belief that the bar was set too high, perhaps to the point to where it turned people off from donating.[/QUOTE]
It should have been at $45k or $50, IMO, but who cares? $45k is nothing to sneeze that.
Also, when you're trying to describe an increase you say that there was an increase of 19.5% from 2007 to 2008. The way you described it had me confused for a while.
2007>2008 - 19.5% increase
2008>2009 - 31% increase
2009>2010 - 7% increase
^That is far easier to understand.