Christopher Reeve.. dead.

Scorch

CAGiversary!
Feedback
72 (100%)
www.drudgereport.com

Nikki Finke in Los Angeles is reporting that actor Christopher Reeve is dead, according to sources close to the actor. He died suddenly Sunday. News of his death has not been reported publicly yet. His family will make an announcement Monday at the earliest. Reeve was just mentioned Friday in the second live presidential debate by John Kerry. Noting he was a friend of the paralysed Reeve, Kerry said he was in favor of further stem cell research because Reeve could walk again one day thanks to such science.... MORE...

Please, God.. dont let this be true..
 
Have heard nothing about this, can not find any other sources to confirm. I doubt it. But it is late so if its true, we'll certainly hear tomorrow morning. Hopefully he's ok.

Someone that did die today though is Ken Caminitti, former NL MVP.
 
Yeah, I haven't heard it anywhere else either, but drudgereport is where many major news outlets get their news from, very sad, but probably true.
 
drudgereport is not very reliable, though they don't really make stuff up either.

Nikki Finke is a hollywood gossip columnist so I dunno how reliable she is either, or if its even really her reporting it.

Caminitti had a heart attack, he was 41. He admitted to using steroids as a player and violated his probation by testing positive for cocaine, so you can probably guess why it happened.
 
drudgereport is not very reliable, though they don't really make stuff up either.

Kinda contradictory, no? If they never make up stuff, then they're reliable. Drudge usually gets ahold of big stories like this.. I really hope that it's not true..
 
Kinda contradictory, no? If they never make up stuff, then they're reliable. Drudge usually gets ahold of big stories like this.. I really hope that it's not true..
No, you can not make stuff up, and still be either wrong or decieved by someone. They may not have made it up but someone else could have.
 
ok im trying to make this post as inoffensive as possible, so please dont flame, theres no ill will meant.

why do people take celebrity deaths so hard? i am not saying it isnt sad that they die, and i wish their families the best, my question is why do you guys care so much about christopher reeve or rodney dangerfeild, or any celebrity that dies? i can see if youre a huge fan of theirs, so if thats it, i understand (i was a huge nirvana fan, well, still am..) but im just curious why everyone is begging for this to be a joke (other than the fact that a human would still be alive) because people die everyday, and ive never understood the whole celebrity thing...

if anyone understood what i said, go you ^^
 
[quote name='punqsux']ok im trying to make this post as inoffensive as possible, so please dont flame, theres no ill will meant.

why do people take celebrity deaths so hard? i am not saying it isnt sad that they die, and i wish their families the best, my question is why do you guys care so much about christopher reeve or rodney dangerfeild, or any celebrity that dies? i can see if youre a huge fan of theirs, so if thats it, i understand (i was a huge nirvana fan, well, still am..) but im just curious why everyone is begging for this to be a joke (other than the fact that a human would still be alive) because people die everyday, and ive never understood the whole celebrity thing...

if anyone understood what i said, go you ^^[/quote]

I know exactly what you mean. I really don't like how celebritys are made more important to the masses, even in death. this is stilla great loss, but so is every death, every day.
 
Punq, I understand. It's just people were hoping for a recovery.. I think there was even a computer generated video of him walking again.. or in some commercial.. and it was amazing. It's the sudden ones that are the worst.. but any death is hard.
 
Confirmed. A piece on Fox News is airing as I type this.

Edit: It's being reported that he went into cardiac arrest, and fell into a coma on Saturday. He was only 52.
 
I only say I hope its not true because its polite. You don't hope for anyone to die (well, most anyone).

Whenever I hear about something happening to anyone, I hope they're ok, unless they're a child molestor or something.

CNN just reported he's dead BTW.
 
Personally, I'm saddened because Christopher Reeve was a very strong example to many people suffering from debilitating injuries - he always had a positive outlook, and he always believed things would get better. I donated to a cause that he was supporting several years ago, and continued to receive mail from his foundation, which supported a lot of excellent causes. I'm sad because I wanted him to succeed - I wanted him to walk again, as he believed he would, before he died.

seppo
 
[quote name='dcfox'][quote name='SneakyPenguin'][quote name='punqsux']ok im trying to make this post as inoffensive as possible, so please dont flame, theres no ill will meant.

why do people take celebrity deaths so hard? i am not saying it isnt sad that they die, and i wish their families the best, my question is why do you guys care so much about christopher reeve or rodney dangerfeild, or any celebrity that dies? i can see if youre a huge fan of theirs, so if thats it, i understand (i was a huge nirvana fan, well, still am..) but im just curious why everyone is begging for this to be a joke (other than the fact that a human would still be alive) because people die everyday, and ive never understood the whole celebrity thing...

if anyone understood what i said, go you ^^[/quote]

I know exactly what you mean. I really don't like how celebritys are made more important to the masses, even in death. this is stilla great loss, but so is every death, every day.[/quote]

In some ways aren't celebrities more important than the regular masses. When people like Einstein, Ghandhi, or Mother Teresa died, you could say its a tragedy because they contributed so much to society, whether it was scientific knowledge or good will. When a celebrity dies its almost the same thing. They had talent or some other trait which distinguished them from the rest of society that they shared and now are no longer to do so. If a guy like me were to die, it really wouldn't matter to many people because my range of influence was very limited. What I could have contributed to all of society is miniscule so my loss is pretty much insignificant as a whole.[/quote]

Just because someone is famous doesn't mean they have contributed a lot to society. Paris Hilton is famous, but all she has contributed to society is "One Night in Paris". Please, don't act as if celebrities and actual important people are equals. Ghandi strived to change the world. Celebrities, with a few vocal (often poorly educated) exceptions, don't. This is not to say that their deaths aren't sad, all deaths are. But to compare Mother Teresa and Christopher Reeve is a shame to the memory of Mother Teresa.
 
I guess the cool thing to do nowadays is to not be sad that Christopher Reeve died. Wow, did I just type that?

I really wanted to see him walk again. Hopefully some good comes out of this, and stem cell research gets the push that it needs.
 
yeah the 11 news on the west coast just reported it, mand is that bad news. I think he was going to have more time on smallville, and I really did have hopes that he would live a pretty long life. It's a miracle that the acident did kill him, so at least he was able to have a few more years to spend with his kids and raise awarness about some important causes. I know he will be really missed.
 
i understand reeves case, which is why i kinda generalized it by asking about celebrity deaths in general.

ghandi, mother teresa and others like them are not celebrities in the traditional sence of the glamor and fame...they are awesome fucking people that devoted their lives into making this world a better place...so thats not comparable.

im not trying to take away from a persons death, as said before, but i dont see how christopher reeve dying is any diffrent from the names in the obits that no one even looks at every day.

do actors contribute to society? moderatley. id say writers contribute more, and i cant think of the last time a writers death made news....actors are mearly in a more popular media format at the moment
 
[quote name='Tromack'][quote name='dcfox'][quote name='SneakyPenguin'][quote name='punqsux']ok im trying to make this post as inoffensive as possible, so please dont flame, theres no ill will meant.

why do people take celebrity deaths so hard? i am not saying it isnt sad that they die, and i wish their families the best, my question is why do you guys care so much about christopher reeve or rodney dangerfeild, or any celebrity that dies? i can see if youre a huge fan of theirs, so if thats it, i understand (i was a huge nirvana fan, well, still am..) but im just curious why everyone is begging for this to be a joke (other than the fact that a human would still be alive) because people die everyday, and ive never understood the whole celebrity thing...

if anyone understood what i said, go you ^^[/quote]

I know exactly what you mean. I really don't like how celebritys are made more important to the masses, even in death. this is stilla great loss, but so is every death, every day.[/quote]

In some ways aren't celebrities more important than the regular masses. When people like Einstein, Ghandhi, or Mother Teresa died, you could say its a tragedy because they contributed so much to society, whether it was scientific knowledge or good will. When a celebrity dies its almost the same thing. They had talent or some other trait which distinguished them from the rest of society that they shared and now are no longer to do so. If a guy like me were to die, it really wouldn't matter to many people because my range of influence was very limited. What I could have contributed to all of society is miniscule so my loss is pretty much insignificant as a whole.[/quote]

Just because someone is famous doesn't mean they have contributed a lot to society. Paris Hilton is famous, but all she has contributed to society is "One Night in Paris". Please, don't act as if celebrities and actual important people are equals. Ghandi strived to change the world. Celebrities, with a few vocal (often poorly educated) exceptions, don't. This is not to say that their deaths aren't sad, all deaths are. But to compare Mother Teresa and Christopher Reeve is a shame to the memory of Mother Teresa.[/quote]

I'm not saying all celebrities contribute alot to society or even positive things to society. And by know means was I trying to draw a direct comparison between Reeves and Mother Teresa. But there is a reason why they're the celebrities and we're not. Whether if they could act, sing, dance, or just a little better looking than the rest of us, that's what they shared with society. Wouldn't you agree that if a talented composer died would be a greater loss to society than someone who just plays video games all day? I know personally that I've done nothing to contribute to society as a whole and don't expect anyone but those who were close to me to care that I'm dead.
 
paris has given the most contribution to society in the last decade.

how u may ask?

the new trend of pleated hooker skirts and the young girls today dressing like party sluts will give way to a new generation of filthy skanks who we can all bang.
 
[quote name='Scorch']ABCnews.com has put up a template for Sharon Osbourne. http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=101124&page=1

This is in no way saying she's dead, or even sick, they're just preparing, I guess.. what's strange, though, is that Christopher Reeve's template was also put up today... (at least, I think it was today. It was soon, as they end numbers are only one lower than the last one.. http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/story?id=101123&page=1 )[/quote]

That is morbid.. and weird... and man... that is messed up.
 
They have templates for everyone they expect could die within the next few years. Odd that she'd be on the list, but I guess they made templates for everyone they could think of, and started doing more for people that are sorta old or sorta into drugs.
 
[quote name='dafoomie']They have templates for everyone they expect could die within the next few years. Odd that she'd be on the list, but I guess they made templates for everyone they could think of, and started doing more for people that are sorta old or sorta into drugs.[/quote]

..or maybe because she has cancer.
 
This is definitely a horrible year if you count the number of celebrity deaths. So sad.

May you rest in peace, Mr. Reeve. You were a terrific actor, and I'm glad to see that other people acknowledged your wide range of acting talent, and that you could do more than just play Superman.

You will always be Superman in my eyes. No one else could ever don the cape, in my opinion. :cry:

Also, it's incredibly disturbing to see Sharon Osbourne's obituary template up like that. I love the Osbourne family, and this would definitely be a saddening loss.

Sometime this week, I'll watch Superman again in Reeve's memory.
 
And, might I add..

supes1.jpg

supes2.jpg
 
[quote name='dafoomie']
..or maybe because she has cancer.
She's not expected to die from it though.[/quote]

Not any moment soon but if you put her medical history through the process used by the insurance industry, she is at a very high risk for reoccurrance, manifestation of other forms of cancer, and potential life threatening effects of the same treatments used to keep the cancer under control. Once your genome becomes error prone the problems cumulatively cut your lifespan.
 
Yeah but in the context of having a template made up for your death, it seems a little premature. Which was my original point, that they probably have most of the really old people covered so they've moved to people who are less likely to die soon, but maybe 5 years down the road.

My wording there doesn't make much sense btw. Oh look, its 6am.
 
bread's done
Back
Top