ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='Vegan']Calling your own members "spammers"? Did anyone else catch that?[/QUOTE]
Non members were able to participate in their forums, as well. I don't know everything that exactly happened on the ECA forums, but there was the possibility of actual "spammers" joining. Although I imagine a lot of them were just angry and felt betrayed.
 
[quote name='georox']No, I'm a person who doesn't bring things down to a personal level, who actually has a level of integrity, and a maturity level beyond that of a thirteen year old.

The logo and Halpin bits, while in bad taste, are nowhere near as bad as what you and others are doing. You are personalizing this issue, and being sexist bastards at that.[/QUOTE]

What issue? You've never said you've wanted to fuck a girl before? Yikes, now I just feel bad for you. I'm not mad at Gypsy at all, I have no issue with her.
 
[quote name='gettinmoney662']What issue? You've never said you've wanted to fuck a girl before? Yikes, now I just feel bad for you. I'm not mad at Gypsy at all, I have no issue with her.[/QUOTE]
It has no relevance, so please just stop. Keep this about the ECA.
 
[quote name='gettinmoney662']What issue? You've never said you've wanted to fuck a girl before? Yikes, now I just feel bad for you. I'm not mad at Gypsy at all, I have no issue with her.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, you're a manly man who says they like to fuck people. Go be manly in the corner, nobody gives a fuck. Stop bringing down the thread IQ.
 
[quote name='mowmow']bumping
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0Af...jbnc5Y2Q&hl=en

and to remind people that we should be concentrating more on ECA than trying to bother her[/QUOTE]

I don't know if this has been mentioned, but doesn't everybody think it would be a good idea to forward a copy of this mass cancellation list to the CT Attorney General also? It would just reinforce to the AG's office how big of a problem this is and how serious we are in getting it resolved. I would also let ECA know that a copy has been sent to the CT AG's office, that way ECA may take things a little more seriously and ensure we all get cancelled in a timely fashion.
 
[quote name='gettinmoney662']What issue? You've never said you've wanted to fuck a girl before? Yikes, now I just feel bad for you. I'm not mad at Gypsy at all, I have no issue with her.[/QUOTE]

What the hell does that have to do with this thread? If you want to make stupid comments like that, go make a blog or something.
 
[quote name='SpazX']Yeah, you're a manly man who says they like to fuck people. Go be manly in the corner, nobody gives a fuck. Stop bringing down the thread IQ.[/QUOTE]


I've reported some posts (couldn't do it from the iPhone earlier), so some of this garbage should disappear shortly. :) Maybe some of these adolescent trolls will be silenced for the day.

CAN'T WE KEEP IT CIVIL PEOPLE?????? Do your parent's know you're online past your curfew?
 
[quote name='ryanflucas']So are the Amazon codes gone for good from the ECA? I tried to log into their forums but it's apparently down and "undergoing maintenance".[/QUOTE]

The Amazon codes have been gone for awhile now.
 
Guys let's tone it down a little. ECA is the issue here...not Gypsyfly. I think she has taken enough flack already for just trying to do her job. You can disagree with the issues all the you want, just knock off the creepy stalker behavior and vulgar comments. Let's exercise a little maturity here.
 

……………………………………..________
………………………………,.-‘”……………….“~.,
………………………..,.-”……………………………..“-.,
…………………….,/………………………………………..”:,
…………………,?………………………………………………\,
………………./…………………………………………………..,}
……………../………………………………………………,:`^`..}
……………/……………………………………………,:”………/
…………..?…..__…………………………………..:`………../
…………./__.(…..“~-,_…………………………,:`………./
………../(_….”~,_……..“~,_………………..,:`…….._/
……….{.._$;_……”=,_…….“-,_…….,.-~-,},.~”;/….}
………..((…..*~_…….”=-._……“;,,./`…./”…………../
…,,,___.\`~,……“~.,………………..`…..}…………../
…………(….`=-,,…….`……………………(……;_,,-”
…………/.`~,……`-………………………….\……/\
………….\`~.*-,……………………………….|,./…..\,__
,,_……….}.>-._\……………………………..|…………..`=~-,
…..`=~-,_\_……`\,……………………………\
……………….`=~-,,.\,………………………….\
…………………………..`:,,………………………`\…………..__
……………………………….`=-,……………….,%`>–==“
…………………………………._\……….._,-%…….`\
……………………………..,
 
[quote name='gettinmoney662']What issue? You've never said you've wanted to fuck a girl before? Yikes, now I just feel bad for you. I'm not mad at Gypsy at all, I have no issue with her.[/QUOTE]
The point being made is this isn't the thread for this and your just being disrespectful. And although you may be comfortable showing little respect for others the rest of us are trying to keep things civil while being proactive with the issues at hand and don't want to be lumped in with those that can't exercise a little tact and just add fuel to a fire that doesn't focus on the actual issues at hand. Anyone can go make there own thread and you can do whatever the fuck you want in it if you feel the need to resort to a childish level but the rest of us prefer not to be dragged down to that level and would like to keep this thread on the issues and not resort to personal attacks which are uncalled for.
 
[quote name='TLPRIME']Guys let's tone it down a little. ECA is the issue here...not Gypsyfly. I think she has taken enough flack already for just trying to do her job. You can disagree with the issues all the you want, just knock off the creepy stalker behavior and vulgar comments. Let's exercise a little maturity here.[/QUOTE]

Actually Gypsy *IS* part of the issue as all shes done is make everything worse with her childish rants, though I do agree the personal attacks and all need to stop as it accomplishes nothing.
 
[quote name='Gypsyfly PMS']Wow, it feels a little weird getting my safety threatened as I’m no one important in the gaming industry lol. The ugly bitch thing and whore thing is a little off putting as I didn’t think some of you would go there but I’m a female gamer and have heard a lot worse. And no, I’m not using it as a shield it was just odd.

I really wish I could give you guys the answers you’re looking for but I don’t really think you would care if I did. I didn’t come here to answer questions as I can’t do that in any official capacity or repeat anything that has already been said, I just came to throw my own personal white flag as the guy who said he lived a few minutes away from me did scare me and my hubby as we read some of the things you guys are writing and friends are informing me of. I live in a pretty crappy neighborhood though, so I doubt he would get far lol, trust me I’m not driving a Maserati. I understand the anger and hostility I just respectively ask that you not threaten my life, safety or whatnot, I could care less if you call my an ugly woman or the opposite and say you want to do um whatever...as a female gamer I've heard it all. When people start tracking you on Google Earth, that's a different beast.

And no I didn’t close the forum that was the tech department tonight as they focus on the site update and give all the mods a break. As I was posting on the ECA forum most of the CAG guys that were there were awesome and respectful and I am genuinely sorry if anyone got banned along with the spammers. Once it is back up we’ll try to unban those that were actually being civil.
Night! btw, I have about 6 dogs, they're pretty small, but they're wicked ankle biters and a little sister who never sleeps. Be warned![/QUOTE]

Honestly I think this a really mature post, and I thank you for coming over here and making it. Everything just got a little crazy. When money is involved tempers can flare. But it's important to stay focused and not resort to stalking and rudeness.

Seriously we made it through 140 pages of civility and solidarity amongst the CAGs. I'm not a frequent poster here, but this thread really made me realize this is an awesome community. Lets not lose it now.
 
[quote name='Gypsyfly PMS']Wow, it feels a little weird getting my safety threatened as I’m no one important in the gaming industry lol. The ugly bitch thing and whore thing is a little off putting as I didn’t think some of you would go there but I’m a female gamer and have heard a lot worse. And no, I’m not using it as a shield it was just odd.

I really wish I could give you guys the answers you’re looking for but I don’t really think you would care if I did. I didn’t come here to answer questions as I can’t do that in any official capacity or repeat anything that has already been said, I just came to throw my own personal white flag as the guy who said he lived a few minutes away from me did scare me and my hubby as we read some of the things you guys are writing and friends are informing me of. I live in a pretty crappy neighborhood though, so I doubt he would get far lol, trust me I’m not driving a Maserati. I understand the anger and hostility I just respectively ask that you not threaten my life, safety or whatnot, I could care less if you call my an ugly woman or the opposite and say you want to do um whatever...as a female gamer I've heard it all. When people start tracking you on Google Earth, that's a different beast.
[/QUOTE]
Sorry to hear; most of our members are trying to stick strictly to the issues at hand. We're hoping that the mods start cracking down on that, because we don't condone personal harassment here. That's all unacceptable.
 
[quote name='channelx99']Actually Gypsy *IS* part of the issue as all shes done is make everything worse with her childish rants, though I do agree the personal attacks and all need to stop as it accomplishes nothing.[/QUOTE]


Yes she is apart of it. As I said people have the right to disagree with all the issues, including how she has handled some things, but the sexual harassment shit needs to stop.

Everyone was in a big uproar when Wombat was the victim of this kind of abuse when he was the gamer of the week for xbox live, and now this community is doing the same thing to Gypsyfly. Being associated with the ECA does not justify the kind of abuse she is receiving from some members of this community.
 
[quote name='TLPRIME']Guys let's tone it down a little. ECA is the issue here...not Gypsyfly. I think she has taken enough flack already for just trying to do her job. You can disagree with the issues all the you want, just knock off the creepy stalker behavior and vulgar comments. Let's exercise a little maturity here.[/QUOTE]

Gypsyfly as an ECA Representetive is pretty deserving of current and, I think, future flack if for no other reason than the pretty slimy attempt to stuff the ECA forum full of yes-man puppets from PMS. That was a move made using positions in two organizations, and a pretty blatant abuse of power.

The problem is, as mentioned, the immature and creepy/pathetic behavior of (hopefully) adolescent boys getting off on the ability to say 'manly' things behind screen names. It's disgusting, it makes all of us look bad, and it's obviously sexist. Unless I missed the pages and pages of debate on whether or not Hal is bangable/how offensive it is to have to see his face if you don't want to sleep with him.

It's frustrating because the issues with Gypsyfly as Sucky Representative Of A Lame Organization have nothing to do with whether or not she's female; it ought to be possible to discuss/criticize her actions independently of how hot people think she is.

(Which, really, I'm agreeing with the quote above, but a lot of times when morons pull this kind of crap, the response is to completely back off the person being criticized, even if they continue to do things worthy of criticism in an official sense. She's pulled enough as an ECA rep to warrant discussion, I think, and very well may continue to do so in the future.)
 
[quote name='Guerrilla']Sorry to hear; most of our members are trying to stick strictly to the issues at hand. We're hoping that the mods start cracking down on that, because we don't condone personal harassment here. That's all unacceptable.[/QUOTE]

Completely true. There are sites out there that I avoid for exactly what has been happening in the thread lately. Primary one being 4chan, but since we went through the CAG chat phase everything as seemed to go a little down hill and all the riff raff and joined in on this topic.

While i personally do not agree with many of the things Gypsyfly has done as a mod (i have more distaste for Gameslaw) that in no way means i would say anything bad about her has a human.

i completely agree with Guerrilla, that we should focus on the actual problem at hand and not on certain individuals, unless their mod duties get our attention in which case we would not focus on that mod, but what was said.
 
[quote name='channelx99']Actually Gypsy *IS* part of the issue as all shes done is make everything worse with her childish rants, though I do agree the personal attacks and all need to stop as it accomplishes nothing.[/QUOTE]


Yes she is apart of it. As I said people have the right to disagree with all the issues, including how she has handled some things, but the sexual harassment shit needs to stop.

Everyone was in a big uproar when Wombat the victim of this kind of abuse when he was the gamer of the week for xbox live, and now this community is doing the same thing to Gypsyfly. Being associated with the ECA does not justify the kind of abuse she is receiving from some members of this community.
 
Here's a novel idea for those talking in this thread.

Any discussions about personal attacks, commentary about specific mods of the ECA in numerous ways, digging up personal information and the like about ECA members/staff/moderators will not be tolerated. Numerous posts related to this have been deleted.

It's easy enough to do it to someone else, though it could easily be done to you, and I'm sure no one here would like to have the same actions taken against them. Keep such idiocy and knuckle-dragging behavior out of this thread, and preferably, keep it to yourself. Regardless of the situation with the ECA, no one should be subjected to comments such as what were deleted.

Keep it civil in here and on-topic. Don't turn this thread into some diatribe about things that have no business or bearing on the top at hand.

Silences, temp bans and permabans are on the table for people that decide to make it personal when there's no business to be doing that.
 
[quote name='gordojones88']This thread has become embarrassing to CAG.[/QUOTE]

I'm off to play Forza, maybe tomorrow the creeps will be distracted.
 
Well, I think its clear the ECA is going to give us what we want, minus an apology if I had to guess, so its not surprising this thread is going downhill and being derailed.

This is the true test for CAG as "activists" - How much does anyone care about contacting sponsors, the BBB, or the Attorney General after we get the cancel auto-renew button back?

Chances are all the BBB complaints will be dismissed after the online cancel option comes back, the AG won't bother to do anything, and like I tried to say before, sponsors are less likely to withdraw their support of the ECA on ethical grounds after ECA remedies the situation.

So what will CAG do? Cancel and walk away? Try to show the ECA that CAGs can be effective activists and maybe ECA and CAG should work together? Continue to want to see the ECA go down?
 
As crappy as the ECA and their mods have been throughout this ordeal, we need to not resort to threats and stalking. Even if the mods have treated you like shit in their forums, threats of violence and stalking people only makes CAG/Neo look like the bad guys. Not only is it just plain wrong, it's damn stupid and hurts any chance of a positive outcome for CAG and the rest of the gaming community.
 
[quote name='Gypsyfly PMS']Wow, it feels a little weird getting my safety threatened as I’m no one important in the gaming industry lol. The ugly bitch thing and whore thing is a little off putting as I didn’t think some of you would go there but I’m a female gamer and have heard a lot worse. And no, I’m not using it as a shield it was just odd.

I really wish I could give you guys the answers you’re looking for but I don’t really think you would care if I did. I didn’t come here to answer questions as I can’t do that in any official capacity or repeat anything that has already been said, I just came to throw my own personal white flag as the guy who said he lived a few minutes away from me did scare me and my hubby as we read some of the things you guys are writing and friends are informing me of. I live in a pretty crappy neighborhood though, so I doubt he would get far lol, trust me I’m not driving a Maserati. I understand the anger and hostility I just respectively ask that you not threaten my life, safety or whatnot, I could care less if you call my an ugly woman or the opposite and say you want to do um whatever...as a female gamer I've heard it all. When people start tracking you on Google Earth, that's a different beast.

And no I didn’t close the forum that was the tech department tonight as they focus on the site update and give all the mods a break. As I was posting on the ECA forum most of the CAG guys that were there were awesome and respectful and I am genuinely sorry if anyone got banned along with the spammers. Once it is back up we’ll try to unban those that were actually being civil.
Night! btw, I have about 6 dogs, they're pretty small, but they're wicked ankle biters and a little sister who never sleeps. Be warned![/QUOTE]

While I certainly can't agree with some of the things I have been hearing about you and your actions (I have no way of proving them false or true) , I do thank you for at least communicating with us. What continues to puzzle me is why are you still the main spokesman? I mean you've stated it yourself that you aren't capable of making any official statements. Why hasn't anyone who can issued an email, or even just posted here? Instead, the ECA continues to let an unpaid forum moderator handle most of the mess. Yes, Hal did respond, but most of us feel his response was very lacking. It just drives me nuts that we are still talking to a mod about hearsay and such when we should have gotten an email or an official statement. As for the answers, most of us aren't looking for an answer. An apology and a promise to fix are all most of us are looking for.
 
[quote name='shrike4242']Here's a novel idea for those talking in this thread.

Any discussions about personal attacks, commentary about specific mods of the ECA in numerous ways, digging up personal information and the like about ECA members/staff/moderators will not be tolerated. Numerous posts related to this have been deleted.

It's easy enough to do it to someone else, though it could easily be done to you, and I'm sure no one here would like to have the same actions taken against them. Keep such idiocy and knuckle-dragging behavior out of this thread, and preferably, keep it to yourself. Regardless of the situation with the ECA, no one should be subjected to comments such as what were deleted.

Keep it civil in here and on-topic. Don't turn this thread into some diatribe about things that have no business or bearing on the top at hand.

Silences, temp bans and permabans are on the table for people that decide to make it personal when there's no business to be doing that.[/QUOTE]

Thanks Shrike. Much appreciated. Guys, we need to focus on the issues, not personal attacks.
 
[quote name='kodave']So what will CAG do? Cancel and walk away? Try to show the ECA that CAGs can be effective activists and maybe ECA and CAG should work together? Continue to want to see the ECA go down?[/QUOTE]

I don't want to see the ECA go down, as a concept at least. If they fix their problems and don't repeat them then I'm alright with it, though I hope that taking responsibility comes with that.
 
[quote name='shrike4242']Here's a novel idea for those talking in this thread.

Any discussions about personal attacks, commentary about specific mods of the ECA in numerous ways, digging up personal information and the like about ECA members/staff/moderators will not be tolerated. Numerous posts related to this have been deleted.

It's easy enough to do it to someone else, though it could easily be done to you, and I'm sure no one here would like to have the same actions taken against them. Keep such idiocy and knuckle-dragging behavior out of this thread, and preferably, keep it to yourself. Regardless of the situation with the ECA, no one should be subjected to comments such as what were deleted.

Keep it civil in here and on-topic. Don't turn this thread into some diatribe about things that have no business or bearing on the top at hand.

Silences, temp bans and permabans are on the table for people that decide to make it personal when there's no business to be doing that.[/QUOTE]

Thank you Shrike!!! Thank you for getting this thread back on it's rails.

If the ECA gets this button to work this time around should we still mail in the sigs? I think we should take every ounce of precaution when dealing with them now. Who's to say the "cancel" button will function correctly this time?
 
[quote name='theloserboy']While I certainly can't agree with some of the things I have been hearing about you and your actions (I have no way of proving them false or true) , I do thank you for at least communicating with us. What continues to puzzle me is why are you still the main spokesman? I mean you've stated it yourself that you aren't capable of making any official statements. Why hasn't anyone who can issued an email, or even just posted here? Instead, the ECA continues to let an unpaid forum moderator handle most of the mess. Yes, Hal did respond, but most of us feel his response was very lacking. It just drives me nuts that we are still talking to a mod about hearsay and such when we should have gotten an email or an official statement. As for the answers, most of us aren't looking for an answer. An apology and a promise to fix are all most of us are looking for.[/QUOTE]

Couldn't agree more, and thanks for getting it back on topic. All we're really looking for is a little communication, possibly an apology, and an easy way to cancel our accounts.
 
[quote name='iammeiam']Gypsyfly as an ECA Representetive is pretty deserving of current and, I think, future flack [/QUOTE]

I'm gonna say my peace and then peace outta this thread. lammelam is totally right here, and I'm afraid this point is going to be instantly forgotten with her appearance here and the sexual stuff and the threats or whatever. The way she handled this situation, in which ECA was totally shady and disgusting in a matter involving peoples' money, was incredibly childish and did absolutely nothing but make the situation worse. Excluding the threats/ugliness debate, some of the posts from her linked to in this thread were no better than a lot of the stuff posted here on CAG. If you're going to act the way she did in many of her posts, especially on the internet, you're going to send a perception of yourself to the people reading, and ESPECIALLY on internet forums people are going to call you on it, probably not with nice words, regardless of whether you are man, woman, attractive, ugly, whatever.

Shit goes down, brah.
 
[quote name='SpazX']I don't want to see the ECA go down, as a concept at least. If they fix their problems and don't repeat them then I'm alright with it, though I hope that taking responsibility comes with that.[/QUOTE]

I *partially* agree with that. Personally though, they have lost my trust and need to regain it. (No, I don't want an Amazon coupon. I mean actually prove they are worth supporting again, and not with buying people off or more sponsors. I mean action.)
 
[quote name='channelx99']http://i48.tinypic.com/5uipld.jpg
http://i47.tinypic.com/2mzvzw7.jpg

Heres the posts by Gypsy responding to why she let people from her clan join after the registration lock- credit goes to neogaf[/QUOTE]

There were apparently replies after mine on that 2nd image, but then the board was shut down minutes later.

Either way its not worth pursuing at this point. She feels justified in what she did, I disagreed along with others, and neither side is going to budge. But the forums are closed and I'm sure when they re-open they'll be opened to all ECA members, CAGs, PMS Clan members, etc.
 
She doesn't deserve any personal attacks like that. If you think she's doing a shitty job as a mod on their forums then say so whenever it's relevant.

[quote name='georox']I *partially* agree with that. Personally though, they have lost my trust and need to regain it. (No, I don't want an Amazon coupon. I mean actually prove they are worth supporting again, and not with buying people off or more sponsors. I mean action.)[/QUOTE]

If I ever paid them any money then I would probably hold them to higher standards. As it is now, unless they show they've done something worthwhile I won't ever be paying for a membership.
 
[quote name='Jesus_S_Preston']I'm gonna say my peace and then peace outta this thread. lammelam is totally right here, and I'm afraid this point is going to be instantly forgotten with her appearance here and the sexual stuff and the threats or whatever. The way she handled this situation, in which ECA was totally shady and disgusting in a matter involving peoples' money, was incredibly childish and did absolutely nothing but make the situation worse. Excluding the threats/ugliness debate, some of the posts from her linked to in this thread were no better than a lot of the stuff posted here on CAG. If you're going to act the way she did in many of her posts, especially on the internet, you're going to send a perception of yourself to the people reading, and ESPECIALLY on internet forums people are going to call you on it, probably not with nice words, regardless of whether you are man, woman, attractive, ugly, whatever.

Shit goes down, brah.[/QUOTE]

While I do still partially blame gypsy, where was Hal in all of this? Why didn't we have an official representative taking our questions and speaking for the company. I think gypsy did a terrible job handling this but honestly it shouldn't have been her responsibility in the first place. Few people are equipped to handle a situation like this.

The lack of communication from official ECA representatives is just pathetic.
 
[quote name='kodave']Well, I think its clear the ECA is going to give us what we want, minus an apology if I had to guess, so its not surprising this thread is going downhill and being derailed. [/QUOTE]

They can't give me what I want. They completely lost my trust with the underhanded way they've hid behind their own TOS (and changed it, without bothering to inform anyone). Is this the kind of group I want representing me, as a gamer? Nope.

They can fix some of the issues, like the cancellation problems and so forth, but IMO, it's ultimately about trust. I don't trust an organization that will modify it's Terms at will, to benefit them. I don't trust an organization that doesn't inform members (and give the option to opt out) of any changes they've made to those Terms. It's utterly ridiculous. Especially when that organization purports to rally against those things themselves.
 
[quote name='theloserboy']While I certainly can't agree with some of the things I have been hearing about you and your actions (I have no way of proving them false or true) , I do thank you for at least communicating with us. What continues to puzzle me is why are you still the main spokesman? I mean you've stated it yourself that you aren't capable of making any official statements. Why hasn't anyone who can issued an email, or even just posted here? Instead, the ECA continues to let an unpaid forum moderator handle most of the mess. Yes, Hal did respond, but most of us feel his response was very lacking. It just drives me nuts that we are still talking to a mod about hearsay and such when we should have gotten an email or an official statement. As for the answers, most of us aren't looking for an answer. An apology and a promise to fix are all most of us are looking for.[/QUOTE]

This. Having someone like Gyspy who obviously doesn't know what is really going on, due to a complete breakdown in communication between the ECA and the mods, handle the PR between the ECA and the gaming community is pretty unacceptable and says far more about the character of the ECA than Gyspy herself. While her actions have been pretty questionable in many respects, I can honestly see her logic in most of what what she is doing and at the very least she is trying to communicate with the information she has at her disposal, which is, thanks to the ECA, very little. If you were to head a forum of an organization that didn't tell you shit about what to do, but that you had a lot of faith in, what would you do? I wouldn't be surprised if many of our reactions would be similar to Gypsy's. Attack the issues, not the person.
 
[quote name='jaynatch']While I do still partially blame gypsy, where was Hal in all of this? Why didn't we have an official representative taking our questions and speaking for the company. I think gypsy did a terrible job handling this but honestly it shouldn't have been her responsibility in the first place. Few people are equipped to handle a situation like this.

The lack of communication from official ECA representatives is just pathetic.[/QUOTE]

It appears Hal has taken the -its going to blow over soon and quiet down soon- approach
 
[quote name='georox']I *partially* agree with that. Personally though, they have lost my trust and need to regain it. (No, I don't want an Amazon coupon. I mean actually prove they are worth supporting again, and not with buying people off or more sponsors. I mean action.)[/QUOTE]

How would they prove it though? What can they do?

I mean, me personally, I'll never trust Hal Halpin as their leader, especially after the way HE acted during this and the BS responses he gave.

Can I really support an organization with him as President? I don't think so.
 
[quote name='channelx99']It appears Hal has taken the -its going to blow over soon and quiet down soon- approach[/QUOTE]

Which shows he knows absolutely nothing about running an organization like this. ECA exists because of its members and to help its members. If you lose the trust of your members there is no ECA.
 
[quote name='SpazX']

If I ever paid them any money then I would probably hold them to higher standards. As it is now, unless they show they've done something worthwhile I won't ever be paying for a membership.[/QUOTE]

Yea, I paid for a membership, and previously felt it was deserved... not as much now. I was honestly willing to pay to renew before this happened, and I can't say I've used many of the offers.
 
[quote name='kodave']Well, I think its clear the ECA is going to give us what we want, minus an apology if I had to guess, so its not surprising this thread is going downhill and being derailed.

This is the true test for CAG as "activists" - How much does anyone care about contacting sponsors, the BBB, or the Attorney General after we get the cancel auto-renew button back?

Chances are all the BBB complaints will be dismissed after the online cancel option comes back, the AG won't bother to do anything, and like I tried to say before, sponsors are less likely to withdraw their support of the ECA on ethical grounds after ECA remedies the situation.

So what will CAG do? Cancel and walk away? Try to show the ECA that CAGs can be effective activists and maybe ECA and CAG should work together? Continue to want to see the ECA go down?[/QUOTE]

I think ECA has no choice but to give its members what they want. I believe the complaints people have already filed with the BBB and AG's office probably motivated Mr. Halpin to get something done quickly. Believe me, when any states AG gets this many complaints against one company, they will look into it. Whether or not they take action, probably all depends on the response from Mr. Halpin in the meantime.

As for an ECA and CAG relationship, I would hope not. To be honest, I'm tired of hearing about the ECA. Once my account is confirmed cancelled, I hope I never hear another word about the ECA.
 
[quote name='kodave']How would they prove it though? What can they do?

I mean, me personally, I'll never trust Hal Halpin as their leader, especially after the way HE acted during this and the BS responses he gave.

Can I really support an organization with him as President? I don't think so.[/QUOTE]

Well i can say they won't get money from me after this incident, but if they do something quite good for the gaming community in general (i don't know what they could do, but if they did do something) then they may be able to regain some of my faith in them. However my support will no matter what be only vocal support.
 
[quote name='channelx99']It appears Hal has taken the -its going to blow over soon and quiet down soon- approach[/QUOTE]
Honestly, I don't even think he's taking this seriously at all. His response (If you even want to call it that) was completely unrelated to the main problem at hand. I mean, if he's really hiding in a hole hoping this will just go by, he's not a very sharp crayon. But if he's taking this all lightly and doesn't feel like dignifying any of these problems with an official response? It just feels to me like he thought giving a broad sweeping general statement was enough, and we aren't important enough to actually be talked to directly.
 
If the ECA issued an apology saying they are sorry for the way their paid staff and unpaid volunteers handled this situation and acted in the mean time while trying to rectify the situation - would that change anyone's mind or opinion on the ECA?

Or do you guys want a full out statement admitting they never should have done what they did in the first place and that they take full responsibility for proceeding the way they did?
 
[quote name='shrike4242']Here's a novel idea for those talking in this thread.

Any discussions about personal attacks, commentary about specific mods of the ECA in numerous ways, digging up personal information and the like about ECA members/staff/moderators will not be tolerated. Numerous posts related to this have been deleted.

It's easy enough to do it to someone else, though it could easily be done to you, and I'm sure no one here would like to have the same actions taken against them. Keep such idiocy and knuckle-dragging behavior out of this thread, and preferably, keep it to yourself. Regardless of the situation with the ECA, no one should be subjected to comments such as what were deleted.

Keep it civil in here and on-topic. Don't turn this thread into some diatribe about things that have no business or bearing on the top at hand.

Silences, temp bans and permabans are on the table for people that decide to make it personal when there's no business to be doing that.[/QUOTE]

Another thanks to you Shrike, I'm glad this thread can try to get back to focusing on the important issue of dealing with canceling our memberships to the ECA rather than a place for childish and sexist attacks.

My hope is that CAG as a community can focus on handling this situation in an intelligent, constructive, and professional manor. I really don't think we need to lower ourselves to the level of hateful language and personal attacks in order to get our point across.
 
[quote name='kodave']If the ECA issued an apology saying they are sorry for the way their paid staff and unpaid volunteers handled this situation and acted in the mean time while trying to rectify the situation - would that change anyone's mind or opinion on the ECA?

Or do you guys want a full out statement admitting they never should have done what they did in the first place and that they take full responsibility for proceeding the way they did?[/QUOTE]

If they issued an apology and fixed the situation, I'd feel that it had been resolved and I'd be happy with the outcome.

However, theres nothing that could possibly cause me to consider another membership with this organization. That trust has been lost and unfortunately there's no way they're earning that back.
 
[quote name='kodave']If the ECA issued an apology saying they are sorry for the way their paid staff and unpaid volunteers handled this situation and acted in the mean time while trying to rectify the situation - would that change anyone's mind or opinion on the ECA?

Or do you guys want a full out statement admitting they never should have done what they did in the first place and that they take full responsibility for proceeding the way they did?[/QUOTE]

I personally am not looking for an apology as much as I am looking for an official statement saying they are working on the problem. I know Gypsyfly has said they are, but i would Hal to show that he is actually paying attention to the issue and is working on a new solution for canceling.

EDIT: I don't consider "we are working on the problem" an apology. It should have been stated since day one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top