ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='x Famous x']Seems to me that people are making a big deal over $20. Also after reading most of the posts here it seems that most of you joined for the amazon 10% deal. You should have educated yourselves with what the ECA was about before giving them your information. Joining a organization to save money without knowing what the company stands for is dumb. With that said how about we all get along and do what we do best, play some video games. :)
[/QUOTE]

Ok HAL or whoever your are, $20 x 500(and counting) is? $10,000. Thats $10,000 you're scamming people for. People who thought they canceled but magically didn't because that "Cancel auto renew" wasn't really working. O yeah, doesn't work. We are smart cheapasses.


[quote name='Gypsyfly PMS']Guys, I didn't write any article I don't work for the marketing department or technical. I'm just an admin and work with their chapters. I don't know why some are still making this personal as I didn't call anyone names, call anyone inept, a lier, treat you like a piece of meat, call you a whore, track your address down or threatened to attack you on Twitter and the PMS forums like they're doing on NeoGaf. I've never attacked anyone beyond the legal boundaries I've seen being done. The only thing I've tried to do is keep the peace until the higher ups can work on the fix. I have relayed everything others have asked or have suggested and they are working on all of it.

And yes, I still believe in ECA, from the moment I joined I believed in ECA and will continue to. It's the same reason I joined PMS, they are my closest friends (from the founders to many of the Generals, and division members) and I would take a million character attacks to protect them as they would me because if you're dedicated you don't jump ship when things go bad.

I understand that in every community there are a few that take it to another level and don't represent a community as a whole and I appreciate the CAG mod removing the nastier comments.[/QUOTE]

[quote name='mis0']@Gypsyfly PMS

When the fuck is ECA gonna fix this shit?

Also, as mentioned before, stop trying to play the victim here. It's a shame that some people have resorted to personal attacks but that should not take away from the real matter at hand here.. which is the insane fuck ups of the ECA. It's cool that you're real committed to your precious ECA, but you gotta understand that it's not just a handful or people who feel that they've been wronged by your organization, it's a fucking boatload.

Open up the fucking forums. If you don't have the power to do so, figure it out and make it happen. You're willing to allow your clan members to sign up if they spread positive bullshit, but you're not allowing legitimate PAID members voice their opinion. You and your shit show organization are trying to censor the masses for selfish and unjust reasons. We are in AMERICA, ECA has to understand that and not try to establish the Fourth Reich here on the interwebs.

I'm just going to assume from here on out that the ECA is secretly a terrorist cell trying to spread their neo-NAZI horse shit and steal my identity. It's the year 2009, it's not that hard to program in a CANCEL button the web page. It would take a fucking day at the most. So please, dear NAZI ECA, stop worshiping the fucking devil aka. HITLER and let me cancel my subscription as I do not believe in the NAZI cause.

Remember, the NAZIs attempted to exterminate all the GYPSIES. They'll turn on you Gypsyfly PMS, eventually. Help us now while you can.

FUCK.[/QUOTE]

I think mis0 sums it up, I don't care of people called u names and threatened you, you brought that unto yourself. If you are sane, you know what ECA is doing is flat out BS. It doesn't take 30 mins to make that "Cancel auto-renew" work. You want to defend ECA fine, but don't feed us garbage. Most of us here don't care about the ECA anymore and just want out AND we want to inform those uninformed about your "DECEPTIVE" cancel policy so they can make use of their soon to be billed $20 to a greater use. Open up your forums and allow this to be discussed, have a rule to make it clean no cussing and no name calling.
 
[quote name='Gypsyfly PMS']The only thing I've tried to do is keep the peace until the higher ups can work on the fix. [/QUOTE]

The key word is "tried". You might have tried, but you failed in a spectacular fashion. I'm completely baffled as to what was going on in your head during your reponses and actions at theeca ,pmsclan and maingear during the last few days. It's like you were set out on doing the exact opposite of what you should do. I honestly felt disgusted by it. Maybe you were just trying to help, but you really have a LOT of learning to do when it comes to handling this tyoe of thing. I don't even consider the whole "I am not a a real member of the ECA" thing to be a valid excuse for your lack of tact. If anything, you should have just kept your mouth closed and let the real ECA higher ups try to handle the situation, instead of making the situation worse.


I don't know exactly what the irrelevant personal attacks/threats made against you were ( they were deleted), but I'm fairly certain they were were unnecessary. Other than those types of comments, I don't have any sympathy for you whatsoever when it comes to the criticism you have received. and by "you" I mean just you, gypsyfly. I don't mean "you" as a way of including the eca, halpin etc ( who also suck).
 
[quote name='Gypsyfly PMS']Guys, I didn't write any article I don't work for the marketing department or technical. I'm just an admin and work with their chapters. I don't know why some are still making this personal as I didn't call anyone names, call anyone inept, a lier, treat you like a piece of meat, call you a whore, track your address down or threatened to attack you on Twitter and the PMS forums like they're doing on NeoGaf. I've never attacked anyone beyond the legal boundaries I've seen being done. The only thing I've tried to do is keep the peace until the higher ups can work on the fix. I have relayed everything others have asked or have suggested and they are working on all of it.

And yes, I still believe in ECA, from the moment I joined I believed in ECA and will continue to. It's the same reason I joined PMS, they are my closest friends (from the founders to many of the Generals, and division members) and I would take a million character attacks to protect them as they would me because if you're dedicated you don't jump ship when things go bad.

I understand that in every community there are a few that take it to another level and don't represent a community as a whole and I appreciate the CAG mod removing the nastier comments.[/QUOTE]

I am sorry people took it too far in their personal attacks against you. Please note, the overwhelming people who were taking part in the discussion at the time came down very hard on the couple of people who were attacking you as a person. I know I, and I am sure others, reported those posts.

Since it's impossible to communicate with you on the ECA forums because paying members cannot register, I would also like to say I've noticed you making a few comments laughing at CAG. However, in the past you have respected this community enough to refer new members here for information about promotions. I cannot give you the exact words, but you also said something along the lines of no one was linking to the ECA's most current info in the post. I have done my best to put all the, from what I can tell, official ECA's statements in the OP- you will even notice the current FAQ is in the first few lines.

I believe everything I have written is honest and truthful. My main concern always has and continues to be- why hasn't the ECA emailed members about their own mistake. Any reasonable person would believe they had canceled their auto renewal when they uncheck a box on a website and receive instant confirmation. Some people from ECA have said we don't need notification because its not in the terms of service. I'm sorry, but that is one of the worst arguments I have ever heard. The TOS are not an all encompassing document. Could you imagine if that excuse was actually viable. A company could do whatever they wanted as long as it wasn't covered in the terms of service. Besides their obligation to notify us, its just the right thing for a consumer advocacy group to do.

Also, I know your just a student(I don't mean that in a bad way), and you are not the President of ECA, but you seem to be the person with the most knowledge and access to the people who matter in the ECA for us to communicate with. I also was under the belief that when you write things like FAQs on the website that you spoke for the ECA. Correct me if that is inaccurate.

My main message to you is this: (1) the ECA should apologize for their handling of this situation and the mistake on their website and (2) notify all members of the non functionality of their own website.
 
I just had a thought that I don't think has been mentioned yet - Are there any programmers who would donate a their skills to create a functioning cancel button to the ECA?

Just a thought. :)


Also- @Gypsyfly - It's regretful that people began slinging personal insults, but unfortunately this is the internet and that's how it works. Once you put your name and face out here, some fool is going to find some way to insult you. I'm sure you've had a pretty hectic/stressful few days. A lot of people probably couldn't have handled the tsunami of nerd rage that hit you any better given the circumstance.

That said- I've received no email (or snail mail) notification that there may be some problems with the website functionality, changes to the TOS, etc, etc. -- That's just not right, and very easy to correct via a quick shout out to your mailing list. A quick email saying "Hey- we've had some issues with the cancellation function- heads up!" would have probably diffused this situation from the beginning.

you might want to make sure someone else is responsible for handling the physical mail next week. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='crewj']gypsyfly pms isn't coming back...[/QUOTE]

I hope that she didn't notice in the CAG TOS that was just updated in 10 minutes from now that she agreed to personally send $30,000 to Child's Play.

I guess she doesn't need to be notified of that change either and that it is retroactively effective.
 
[quote name='mis0']@Gypsyfly PMS

When the fuck is ECA gonna fix this shit?

Also, as mentioned before, stop trying to play the victim here. It's a shame that some people have resorted to personal attacks but that should not take away from the real matter at hand here.. which is the insane fuck ups of the ECA. It's cool that you're real committed to your precious ECA, but you gotta understand that it's not just a handful or people who feel that they've been wronged by your organization, it's a fucking boatload.

Open up the fucking forums. If you don't have the power to do so, figure it out and make it happen. You're willing to allow your clan members to sign up if they spread positive bullshit, but you're not allowing legitimate PAID members voice their opinion. You and your shit show organization are trying to censor the masses for selfish and unjust reasons. We are in AMERICA, ECA has to understand that and not try to establish the Fourth Reich here on the interwebs.

I'm just going to assume from here on out that the ECA is secretly a terrorist cell trying to spread their neo-NAZI horse shit and steal my identity. It's the year 2009, it's not that hard to program in a CANCEL button the web page. It would take a fucking day at the most. So please, dear NAZI ECA, stop worshiping the fucking devil aka. HITLER and let me cancel my subscription as I do not believe in the NAZI cause.

Remember, the NAZIs attempted to exterminate all the GYPSIES. They'll turn on you Gypsyfly PMS, eventually. Help us now while you can.

FUCK.[/QUOTE]

:applause: Epic.

And a big thanks to Reira as well. Signed the list, and hope the numbers keep growing.
 
OK, 145 pages and I joined the ECA for the sole purpose of the amazon discount. I was never able to get the discount and now it appears it is never coming back. Therefore, I have no use for this so HOW exactly do I cancel? I have to write (handwrite?) a letter and mail it to where? Apparently they do not have a cancel button or email option?
 
Well, hopefully we can get this thread back on track.

Anyways, list has been updated with 560 entries. I'm running some errands today, so any new entries will have to wait until I get back to get their e-mails hidden.

http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AfBFe-z6aDCCZGp0NndmNF8xZ2Njbnc5Y2Q&hl=en

If anybody is willing to deliver these, LMK. (I know some people were talking about showing up at ECA, but that was many pages ago.) Otherwise we'll start looking at putting them all in a big box & mailing them out.
 
I'm sick of the ECA. Instead of addressing issues, it's once again our faults because a few assholes screwed up. Gypsyfly and the ECA are still at fault here, and still have not made amends. To say this is a non-issue because she was "personally" attacked, is forgetting why this all happened.

I'm still of the opinion, "Screw the ECA". They tried to fuck over their member base, and me. Screw them, and screw their nazi-like mods. This shit can't be forgotten.
 
There are hundreds of thousands of typed words in this thread and elsewhere, when it really comes down to this:

The ECA
1) deflected responsibility
2) acted unprofessionally by changing the TOS
3) proposed an unconvincing and poorly conceived explanation for #2
4) blamed the victim in the process
5) dodged culpability by continuing to blame end users

and, of course:
6) still offer no genuine explanation as to what issues they stand for or lobby for. this org is a tax shelter or money playground for Halpin. I'm almost sure of it, given that what they purport to do (advocate) is not discussed, either by action or by platform position, on the website.

The ECA: we advocate stuff to protect shit from other stuff.
 
I am really starting to believe that Gypsyfly is not actually a unique person, but is Hal in disguise. There is no way that 'she' can be so blind to all of the wrongs that the ECA is doing, and yet still puts 100% of her trust into this scamming organization. The ECA could start killing off millions of people, and Gypsyfly would still be here claiming that she isn't going to run away from a hard time for the organization and that she believes in the ECAs decisions. I have yet to see one real idea out of her as a person that differs from Hal's, which makes me believe they are the same person. If they are in fact different people, then I think we have an entire new issue on our hands....the ECA is brainwashing its moderators and workers.

Let this terrible, terrible organization crumble to the ground. We don't want you anymore! A non-profit organization represents its members, yet the ECA only represents itself while silencing its members. I want nothing more to do with the ECA.
 
[quote name='GaveUpTomorrow']I am really starting to believe that Gypsyfly is not actually a unique person, but is Hal in disguise. There is no way that 'she' can be so blind to all of the wrongs that the ECA is doing, and yet still puts 100% of her trust into this scamming organization. The ECA could start killing off millions of people, and Gypsyfly would still be here claiming that she isn't going to run away from a hard time for the organization and that she believes in the ECAs decisions. I have yet to see one real idea out of her as a person that differs from Hal's, which makes me believe they are the same person. If they are in fact different people, then I think we have an entire new issue on our hands....the ECA is brainwashing its moderators and workers. .[/QUOTE]

Actually, I've seen this quite often with groups that contain "true believers" like Gypsy. This doesn't mean that she's brainwashed or mindless, just that she really believes (and honestly, before this cancellation thing broke out this organization really seemed to be one that I could confidently stand behind). Keep in mind that Gypsy is also the Marketing Manager, which carries a few similiar functions to PR. As such, even if she might have dissenting opinions (that's an if, not a does) then she might be keeping them to herself in her role as MM.
 
[quote name='saigumi']I hope that she didn't notice in the CAG TOS that was just updated in 10 minutes from now that she agreed to personally send $30,000 to Child's Play.

I guess she doesn't need to be notified of that change either and that it is retroactively effective.[/QUOTE]

Post of the thread.
 
[quote name='GaveUpTomorrow']I am really starting to believe that Gypsyfly is not actually a unique person, but is Hal in disguise. There is no way that 'she' can be so blind to all of the wrongs that the ECA is doing, and yet still puts 100% of her trust into this scamming organization.[/QUOTE]

It's easy to be a bit blind when you truly believe in something, it's also her 'job' and something she's put a lot of time and energy into. Regardless the issue is the ECA not individuals. I don't agree with some of the stances their mods have taken but I do at least understand them.
 
as a response to gypsyfly, calling someone an "attention whore" is by no means the same thing as calling someone a "whore," of course an "attention whore" would pretend not to know this to get attention.

Also the use of gypsy in your name is offensive to me.
 
You guys have taken this from a concentrated effort for change to a witch hunt. Even a seasoned troll like myself has more respect for others than that.
 
[quote name='bubo']Actually, I've seen this quite often with groups that contain "true believers" like Gypsy. [/QUOTE]

Really, and if you don't believe him, just go to the Steam forums and see first hand.

It's amazing how this thread has grown. I never joined the ECA (I'm too much of a cheapass and by the time I thought to join when it was free, the Amazon codes were gone so I said the hell with it), so I'm feeling happy for myself right now. But I can't see this organization ever getting much traction anymore. They may as well close shop because they've lost all credibility. After they let everyone who wants to leave go (and they eventually will), who will sign up?
 
I'm starting to think that just disputing the transaction with my credit card company will be easier than dealing with the ECA at this point.

Besides, if you think a few thousand people posting and emailing this story is giving them a headache, imagine the migrane a few thousand people's bank's lawyers would cause this summer.
 
[quote name='Gypsyfly PMS']Guys, I didn't write any article I don't work for the marketing department or technical. I'm just an admin and work with their chapters. I don't know why some are still making this personal as I didn't call anyone names, call anyone inept, a lier, treat you like a piece of meat, call you a whore, track your address down or threatened to attack you on Twitter and the PMS forums like they're doing on NeoGaf. I've never attacked anyone beyond the legal boundaries I've seen being done. The only thing I've tried to do is keep the peace until the higher ups can work on the fix. I have relayed everything others have asked or have suggested and they are working on all of it.

And yes, I still believe in ECA, from the moment I joined I believed in ECA and will continue to. It's the same reason I joined PMS, they are my closest friends (from the founders to many of the Generals, and division members) and I would take a million character attacks to protect them as they would me because if you're dedicated you don't jump ship when things go bad.

I understand that in every community there are a few that take it to another level and don't represent a community as a whole and I appreciate the CAG mod removing the nastier comments.[/QUOTE]



I dont agree with some of the others that say you shouldn't be personally attacked.

You took action,
You choose to support your scum bag of a leader hal.
You chose to support the organization instead of the members.
You worked to silence/moderate/ban/attack members of ECA.
You brough in PMS into the mix.
You allowed 'supporters' to join ECA, while not allowing members to join.

IMHO, that makes you responsible for some of the mess. You could have made better choices.
so IMHO, its not far out to call you personaly a B**CH. It might sound harsh, but its not based on your sex, didn't even know your a chick, its based on your ACTIONS.

Futhermore, just like Hal is a d-bag, his mods, including you are the same. The apple did not fall far from the tree. And unless you have any examples where you worked to support the members, vs support the IMHO two bit crook that Hal is; you also hold some responsbility.

So you worked to help fan the flames. Then you cry that the fire is out of control? Your out of your freaking mind.
 
[quote name='nbballard']I just had a thought that I don't think has been mentioned yet - Are there any programmers who would donate a their skills to create a functioning cancel button to the ECA?

Just a thought. :)
[/QUOTE]

We discussed this issue in a bit of detail about 10 pages back. There are at least 2 or 3 people who know how to fix it, and one offered to do it for free.
 
I honestly don't feel like this was just a big fiasco the company mishandled. I genuinely feel that this was a concerted effort by a dishonest organization to make money. I mean, what kind of honest company has in their TOS that they can change the TOS at will, and then not even notify its members. I joined for free based on the promotion they were ADVERTISING. I never used any codes, and after the promotion was gone I didn't really see the company to be doing much of anything and wanted to cancel. Now I'm having to run through hoops just to cancel my membership. I never abused any codes, and instead have continually felt ignored and belittled by their responses to all this. Again, I really see this all as a scam.

1) The president advertises free memberships in a well known game magazine
2)The promotion expires shortly after the advertisement
3)All forms of expedient cancellation processes are revoked
4)The TOS are constantly changing and any dissent on their website is moderated and banned

Honestly, how hard is it to make an online cancellation button, especially if it was already there? It's obvious they're trying to forcefully keep members. If you can sign up easily online but cannot cancel with the same ease, that is the mark of a dishonest organization.
 
[quote name='mwoody8601']I honestly don't feel like this was just a big fiasco the company mishandled. I genuinely feel that this was a concerted effort by a dishonest organization to make money. I mean, what kind of honest company has in their TOS that they can change the TOS at will, and then not even notify its members. I joined for free based on the promotion they were ADVERTISING. I never used any codes, and after the promotion was gone I didn't really see the company to be doing much of anything and wanted to cancel. Now I'm having to run through hoops just to cancel my membership. I never abused any codes, and instead have continually felt ignored and belittled by their responses to all this. Again, I really see this all as a scam.

1) The president advertises free memberships in a well known game magazine
2)The promotion expires shortly after the advertisement
3)All forms of expedient cancellation processes are revoked
4)The TOS are constantly changing and any dissent on their website is moderated and banned

Honestly, how hard is it to make an online cancellation button, especially if it was already there? It's obvious they're trying to forcefully keep members. If you can sign up easily online but cannot cancel with the same ease, that is the mark of a dishonest organization.[/QUOTE]

IMHO, the ECA is now nothing more then a small scale Barry Madoff.

Hal Harold Guide to profit:

1) create [sham] organization
2) give away membership but require CC to keep active
3) make it hard to cancel
4) do no work
5) PROFIT
 
[quote name='mwoody8601']I mean, what kind of honest company has in their TOS that they can change the TOS at will, and then not even notify its members.[/QUOTE]

Quite a few actually. In fact I would go as far as to say that most have that provision, and it's part of almost any boilerplate contract I've seen regarding an ongoing, large-audience relationship.

While it seems like an attempt to abuse the user, in it's original context this is a necessary tool for an ongoing large audience endeavor. A classic example would be if the TOS did not originally include provisions that label personal abuse as not permitted. If someone started to personally abuse other members, then the provider wants to be able to swiftly add in a personal attack clause in order to stop the behavior. Without the change clause, this would take a good length of time during which the personal abuse could continue (well, it could be shoehorned in but there is the risk of legal liability in situations not as clear cut as personal abuse).

However, a lot of companies use the change clause in a manner that people feel is inappropriate, such as what happened here. It's not common, but it's not uncommon either. I would have believed that the ECA would be one to uphold appropriate TOS change clause usage while condemning the type of changes made in this situation, but obviously I was wrong.
 
[quote name='opfreak']IMHO, the ECA is now nothing more then a small scale Barry Madoff.

Hal Harold Guide to profit:

1) create [sham] organization
2) give away membership but require CC to keep active
3) make it hard to cancel
4) do no work
5) PROFIT[/QUOTE]


:applause::applause::applause:
 
[quote name='shrike4242']Here's a novel idea for those talking in this thread.

Any discussions about personal attacks, commentary about specific mods of the ECA in numerous ways, digging up personal information and the like about ECA members/staff/moderators will not be tolerated. Numerous posts related to this have been deleted.

It's easy enough to do it to someone else, though it could easily be done to you, and I'm sure no one here would like to have the same actions taken against them. Keep such idiocy and knuckle-dragging behavior out of this thread, and preferably, keep it to yourself. Regardless of the situation with the ECA, no one should be subjected to comments such as what were deleted.

Keep it civil in here and on-topic. Don't turn this thread into some diatribe about things that have no business or bearing on the top at hand.

Silences, temp bans and permabans are on the table for people that decide to make it personal when there's no business to be doing that.[/QUOTE]For the people that missed this a few pages back.
 
[quote name='Gypsyfly PMS']Guys, I didn't write any article I don't work for the marketing department or technical. I'm just an admin and work with their chapters. I don't know why some are still making this personal as I didn't call anyone names, call anyone inept, a lier, treat you like a piece of meat, call you a whore, track your address down or threatened to attack you on Twitter and the PMS forums like they're doing on NeoGaf. I've never attacked anyone beyond the legal boundaries I've seen being done. The only thing I've tried to do is keep the peace until the higher ups can work on the fix. I have relayed everything others have asked or have suggested and they are working on all of it.

And yes, I still believe in ECA, from the moment I joined I believed in ECA and will continue to. It's the same reason I joined PMS, they are my closest friends (from the founders to many of the Generals, and division members) and I would take a million character attacks to protect them as they would me because if you're dedicated you don't jump ship when things go bad.

I understand that in every community there are a few that take it to another level and don't represent a community as a whole and I appreciate the CAG mod removing the nastier comments.[/QUOTE]

Ok I gave you props for coming over here and asking the harassers to stop. That takes some courage. But seriously? Keep the peace? That's a blatant lie and you know it. What did your little post on the PMS forums have to do with keeping the peace. The ECA forums have the ECA logo on them, and like it or not, any actions taken on those forums reflect directly on the ECA. You may not have been making official statements, but everything you did on the ECA forums is a reflection on the organization as a whole.

"CheapAssGamers
 
Great addition on wiki - pretty much summed it up in a couple of sentences:
Controversy

On December 2, 2009, controversy arose regarding Hal Halpin's ECA organization's membership cancellation policy, in which the ECA's terms of membership were changed without notifying ECA users. The change in terms of membership made it harder to cancel one's ECA membership, requiring you to mail a letter, rather than automatically cancel your account over the internet, over email, over the phone, or over fax. The terms of membership also stated that there was no guarantee the ECA would receive your letter unless you paid to include signature confirmation, and that if you tried to change or leave your credit card information outdated, the ECA would still bill the account to have it updated to the correct information. Halpin had previous decried such practices in an article he penned:
EULAs are a real and tangible problem for our business. Quite simply, they're out of control. The best intentions of lawyers in the business aside, these contracts have become so unwieldy that they regularly infringe on consumer rights. Many would likely be unenforceable in a court of law. Others, consumers would be shocked to find out what all of that fine print actually meant.
 
[quote name='sickle']Great addition on wiki - pretty much summed it up in a couple of sentences:
Controversy

On December 2, 2009, controversy arose regarding Hal Halpin's ECA organization's membership cancellation policy, in which the ECA's terms of membership were changed without notifying ECA users. The change in terms of membership made it harder to cancel one's ECA membership, requiring you to mail a letter, rather than automatically cancel your account over the internet, over email, over the phone, or over fax. The terms of membership also stated that there was no guarantee the ECA would receive your letter unless you paid to include signature confirmation, and that if you tried to change or leave your credit card information outdated, the ECA would still bill the account to have it updated to the correct information. Halpin had previous decried such practices in an article he penned:
EULAs are a real and tangible problem for our business. Quite simply, they're out of control. The best intentions of lawyers in the business aside, these contracts have become so unwieldy that they regularly infringe on consumer rights. Many would likely be unenforceable in a court of law. Others, consumers would be shocked to find out what all of that fine print actually meant.
[/QUOTE]

Yeah I saw that. It's a great concept, but filled with mistakes. I don't have a wikipedia account but someone who does needs to fix that. It isn't going to be taken seriously if it doesn't use correct spelling and grammar.
 
Man, I am sooooooo glad I used a virtual credit card when setting up membership with these cretins. Like to see them try to auto-charge that and/or take me to collections. :p
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='jaynatch']Yeah I saw that. It's a great concept, but seriously who proofread that. I don't have a wikipedia account but someone who does seriously needs to fix that. It isn't going to be taken seriously if it doesn't use correct spelling and grammar.[/QUOTE]

yes. and add the bit about the removal of the opt out button and lying about that it never worked (even though it was on the website for about a year).
 
[quote name='opfreak']IMHO, the ECA is now nothing more then a small scale Barry Madoff.

Hal Harold Guide to profit:

1) create [sham] organization
2) give away membership but require CC to keep active
3) make it hard to cancel
4) do no work
5) PROFIT[/QUOTE]

His name is Hal Halpin, or Harold J. Halpin III

And the correct sequence would be this, if you're going to do an internet meme right:

1) create [sham] organization
2) give away membership but require CC to keep active
3) make it hard to cancel
4) do no work
5) ???
5) PROFIT

Also, I think it would be in Gyspsyfly's best interest to stop talking about this issue. She has a right to ask to stop being personally harassed of course, but there's a reason the ECA forums are down. It's not like she's going to answer anyone's questions here, and every time she posts people just get more riled up and we go back over issues ad nauseam that had already been covered and even actually answered.

The bottom line is this folks:

We're going to get some kind of cancellation button back!

We're also never going to get true answers about what happened with:

  • Amazon codes
  • The GIMAG fiasco
  • The existence of a previous cancellation button
  • Changing the TOS
  • Abusive, uninformed, and ill-trained moderators, admins, and community liaisons

At best, the only other thing we can hope for is an apology and for Hal Halpin to step down.

This thread needs to be forward looking and not harp on Gypsyfly and past issues that are quite frankly irrelevant at this point because there will never be straight answers and we'll be speculating for eternity.
 
[quote name='Gypsyfly PMS']Guys, I didn't write any article I don't work for the marketing department or technical. I'm just an admin and work with their chapters. I don't know why some are still making this personal as I didn't call anyone names, call anyone inept, a lier, treat you like a piece of meat, call you a whore, track your address down or threatened to attack you on Twitter and the PMS forums like they're doing on NeoGaf. I've never attacked anyone beyond the legal boundaries I've seen being done. The only thing I've tried to do is keep the peace until the higher ups can work on the fix. I have relayed everything others have asked or have suggested and they are working on all of it.

And yes, I still believe in ECA, from the moment I joined I believed in ECA and will continue to. It's the same reason I joined PMS, they are my closest friends (from the founders to many of the Generals, and division members) and I would take a million character attacks to protect them as they would me because if you're dedicated you don't jump ship when things go bad.

I understand that in every community there are a few that take it to another level and don't represent a community as a whole and I appreciate the CAG mod removing the nastier comments.[/QUOTE]

Look, the core issue we're having with the ECA is the cancellation process. There's no guarantee we get to opt out unless we send a letter with signature confirmation. And if we have outdated credit card information, the ECA hunts down our credit card information until they can finally charge us. How exactly is that legit? It's been quoted in the TOS many times. Perhaps you should give it a read?

Why won't the ECA address this concern that is the reason that makes the ECA a scam? That's the only thing ECA needs to respond to.
 
this is great:
2001eca.jpg
 
[quote name='MrBeatdown']Since your previous comment, I haven't seen anyone claim that you called anyone a liar, inept, a whore, etc. In fact, everyone is on your side as far as the immature name calling, threats, and all that stuff is concerned.

The only replies I've seen directed at you since your last post are dealing with your actions. You were the one who basically summed up this entire situation as a handful of scammers out for revenge when we have made it quite clear what our issues are and many others outside of CAG have done the same. You personally, have misrepresented us to your clan members, just as Hal Halpin did in his press release. Most of us don't care about the Amazon promo. Most of us were happy to remain ECA members and even renew our subscription because we believed in the cause. Yet you lump all of us in with a few bad apples.

That was you that did that.

Then you abused your mod privileges by offering to allow members who shared your view into the ECA forums. Those forums are for all ECA members whether we agree with the ECA's policies or not. Nothing in the ToS states that we have to agree with Hal Halpin. You have every right to do what you want on your own forums, but picking and choosing who is and isn't allowed in a forum where your only job is to maintain civility is simply an abuse of your status. You weren't trying to keep the peace. You were trying to add fuel to the fire on one side, and snuff it out on other.

As members who are being blocked from joining the forum, we have good reason to be upset with you. I completely agree that things shouldn't be directed at you simply because you are a mod. And they shouldn't be calling names and making threats simply because of your point of view. However, as someone who was supposed to remain neutral when it comes to mod responsibilities, we have every right to direct our complaints towards you regarding your actions in a civilized manner.

You need to accept that what you did was unfair to us. What we are saying to you isn't any more personal than what you did to us.[/QUOTE]
As I said before, I think she just grasping at straws at this point, holding onto anything that makes us look like the bad guy, just like Hal did in his "excuse letter".

She won't admit she did wrong, Hal won't admit he did wrong. The ECA is a fine, upstanding organization that was infiltrated by the "unwashed masses" and they don't have any responsibilities to the consumers they vow to defend.

Give me a break.
 
The problems ECA are facing are so simple to address that it can only lead me one of two conclusions (or both): 1)ECA management is incompetent or 2)ECA management is indifferent to actually serving its membership.

You are a consumer advocacy association. Simply communicate with your membership. It goes a long way.

You advocate making EULAs more "user friendly", but then do the same with your own TOS. How did anyone think this was a good idea?

Abuse of codes could be simply fixed by limiting them to one code per month per account. How does the ECA not have anyone on their staff that can run a website with simple controls? Even one 10% Amazon code a month would be well worth the membership fee.

Same thing with online cancellation. Its almost 2010. Are there any websites out there that require snail mail to cancel besides shady scam sites? Especially a video game advocacy association.

Instead, the ECA seems to be all about Hal Halpin. He is apparently the video game messiah and we should all just get in line and follow him. Its too bad some egomaniac ruins the reputation of an organization that I think, on the surface, represents views most of us on here would agree with. Hopefully someone steps up to fill the void, and is run by competent people who understand what "consumer advocacy" is all about.
 
[quote name='BurtReynolds']Same thing with online cancellation. Its almost 2010. Are there any websites out there that require snail mail to cancel besides shady scam sites? Especially a video game advocacy association.[/QUOTE]

Also, an association that allows you to sign up online. Seems kind of silly that you can sign up online, but you have send a letter via the Pony Express to get out.
 
[quote name='Ivanhoe']Its funny that you ask "where do they find these mods?"

Apparantely they are just forwarded over from pmsclan.com (lol) to theeca to makeup some fake support threads to try and offset the concerns of real members of theeca.


!!!!!!WALL OF TEXT INCOMING!!!!!!!

Take a look Posted by gypsypms on her own forums.

--------

"Please Help Defend ECA!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As some of you may have noticed from varies gaming blogs like Consumerist or Kotaku, about what was initially the complaints from a few core people who were upset over membership cancellation policies.

The current form of cancellation is via mail by sending your name and email which many organizations have a similar policy.

Before you could cancel by phone when the org was smaller however as it grew a small group of active members were repeatedly joining, leaving and re-joining the organization in order to take advantage of member benefits/promotions that as many of you know are updated often as most are promotions. So they decided to move to requiring a mailed in form instead of calls, but did state they were moving toward a more automated infrastucture in the future.

However, a site update by the design during a partner promotion revealed a nonfunctional backend "cancel" button that was never implemented for public use and was actually for the ECA staff. Staff were not aware that this button had been made public until a trial ECA member asked about stopping auto-renew so they would not be charged. The site firm than took down the button, which upset members who believed they could cancel their accounts that way despite the fact that the Terms of Service they agreed to state otherwise.

Well, long story short, the few that ECA have identified (most of which are free trial members, many of which joined only for the Amazon discount) have been bashing ECA for awhile since Amazon ended their promotion which as it also states in the TOS they are free to do (partners set the terms of the benefit/promotion).

The auto renew function they thought was there for them and functioning, but wasn't was pretty much the match they needed to attack the ECA. They believe ECA had that function live all along and removed it to be slimy. If you do a search you'll actually see some members quoting themselves and pretty much copy and pasting their own comments across varies blogs/sites. They tried contacting ECA partners (who are standing by ECA btw), they contacted BBB (which was a B+ yesterday until they decided to bombard the site with this and will revert back once ECA has a chance to regroup and implement these changes).

Again, everything was in the Terms of Service agreed to the first initial 2 claims sent into the BBB were closed. They seemed to have contacted a few members here as well. They are even going so far as posting their benefits in places like Digg because they think that will get them canceled (it won't) lol they just needed to send name and email which takes at most 5 minutes.

ECA has defended all gamers and has been a dedicated partner of PMS H2O Clan since 2006. We are one of the first organizations to receive comp memberships and the first and only clan to work with ECA. Not only do I still believe in them I work with them to represent chapters and active gamers. ECA needs our support now!

People are so easy to hate, and so slow to love as I've mentioned in other places And PMS H2O knows a little bit about this.

Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving foward to better reflect the needs of members. There have been mistakes, but people have gone a little overboard.

Here is Hal's initial statement: http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7105

And here are the current membership renewal policies:

http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158

Here are the current Terms of Service.

Here are the site captures for Theeca.com and if you check the earliest dates..the only major change to the cancellation section is from being able to call to having to mail your request. And nowhere do you see an online option. So those that say the TOS is changed "daily" have not provided any proof, dates, or those quoted changes.

Please help ECA by visiting the forums and the following sites and commenting about your support for ECA and belief in the mission. If you are not currently registered there please let me know via email: [email protected] and I will add you as I have shut it down to new registrations. Spammers bombarded the site and I had to temporarily close it to new registrations until things calmed down (There were only two mods, including me).

These places were pretty fast to post random emails but are taking forever to update that ECA is actually working on a solution for easier account management.

Please help ECA by also going to these sites and adding your support or at least understanding that something is being done and this should not discredit the efforts and mission of the organization. Hopefully, they will update about the upcoming changes.

NOTE: Do not get into a grudge match or troll, that would just make PMS H2O look bad and I don't want them heading here either lol. Just add your civil comments or email the original blog poster and be truthful. And if you see codes posted on Craigslist or other places request that they remove them.

Consumerist

Kotaku

Consumerist Digg

Escapist

CheapAssGamers
 
Yes, we think we're planning a revolution. Well, maybe some of us do. Anyway, it seems like the ECA and its supporters are just overly annoyed that we've probably done more for the cause of gamers in a week than the ECA has ever done.
 
[quote name='kodave']
Also, I think it would be in Gyspsyfly's best interest to stop talking about this issue. She has a right to ask to stop being personally harassed of course, but there's a reason the ECA forums are down. It's not like she's going to answer anyone's questions here, and every time she posts people just get more riled up and we go back over issues ad nauseam that had already been covered and even actually answered.
[/QUOTE]

She was only posting here because she probably had nothing else better to do since ECA forums were down. Even though that was the first post that somewhat made some sort of sense, it's too little too late. I rather not have her post anymore since any posts now will just seem like an attempt to win back "cool" points with Gamer communities. Not going to happen, or at least not with me.
 
[quote name='bigdaddybruce44']Yes, we think we're planning a revolution. Well, maybe some of us do. Anyway, it seems like the ECA and its supporters are just overly annoyed that we've probably done more for the cause of gamers in a week than the ECA has ever done.[/QUOTE]

What bothers me is that most people would have never heard of the ECA without CAG (and the Amazon promotion).
 
^Appears the PMS|H2O Editor In Chief has responded to this thread now.

he/she goes on to say:
"...and should you be a fraction of ECA members up for renewal in the next 30 days.....try that mail thing."
Obviously he does not know that you HAVE to cancel 30 days in advance and just the mailing time will take one to two weeks, depending where you're sending it from. So you would have had to sent it about 2 weeks ago (before this problem actually arose)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='sickle']^Appears the PMS|H2O Editor In Chief has responded to this thread now.

he goes on to say:
"...and should you be a fraction of ECA members up for renewal in the next 30 days.....try that mail thing."
Obviously he does not know that you HAVE to cancel 30 days in advance and just the mailing time will take one to two weeks, depending where you're sending it from. So you would have had to sent it about 2 weeks ago (before this problem actually arose)[/QUOTE]

Isn't it a she?
 
I've been following bits and pieces of this discussion since it started. Interesting to see some ECA people posting here and that gypsy's been a member since last year. Kind of sad that people would resort to personal attacks on her, even if she does some work for an organization we now have a pretty low opinion of.

Anyway, if any ECA folk haven't been scared off by some of the less civil people here, I'd be really curious to hear some more details about the people exploiting ECA's system. To me, that's one of the more irritating things about this whole mess. It's repeatedly been thrown out as the reason for making it more difficult to cancel a membership. The thing is, so far as I can tell the benefits that people were using weren't limited to 1-time-per-person. As in, there was no incentive to repeatedly join and cancel and join and cancel. In fact, before Hal made the memberships free, anyone joining and canceling multiple times would be paying a whole lot of extra money for access to the same benefits as if they'd just stayed a member. Even with the free memberships, there was no real benefit to joining multiple times, as anyone could claim as many unique Amazon codes as they wanted on their membership.

To me, this whole thing looks like it was set up to be a scam from the moment Amazon agreed to the 10%-off codes. They were used to bait in as many paying members as would join. I was among that number. I hadn't heard of the ECA before and it seemed like a decent organization with a neat promotion for members, so I paid to join.

Then, after the rate of new paid members leveled out, Hal announces free memberships to people. Whatever arrangement Amazon had with the ECA, I doubt it included unlmited 10% discounts to anyone that wanted them. A flood of people join the ECA thinking they're getting a no-strings-attached discount. Amazon gets pissed and suspends the promotion. Worried that a bunch of people will now cancel their enrollment, the ECA changes its TOS to make it difficult for people to leave.

Maybe some of the above is wrong, but its certainly how it appears to someone relatively new to your organization. And when Hal starts throwing out BS spin on why the changes were made, it only makes it seem more likely that the whole thing was intended to rip people off from the start.
 
Wow, next thing you know she'll cut & paste the contact listing for the sponsors that a CAG spent a lot of time compiling and direct her minions to to counter contact the sponsors.

Opening up the ECA forums so that she can counter weight vocal concerns that bend the light in her favor...WOW...unheard of and an Administrator of my forums would find they didn't have access on Monday.

Don't lose focus guys...keep on with contacting the sponsors...keep this thread clean, what do you think those sponsors are going to think when they visit this thread for reference.

Stay focused, I'd hate to see the BBB throw out all of those complaints on frivolous grounds. Or, the CT attorney general not wanting to go to bat because a few people cause CAG as a whole to be viewed as a bunch of immature kids.
 
[quote name='maxfisher']I've been following bits and pieces of this discussion since it started. Interesting to see some ECA people posting here and that gypsy's been a member since last year. Kind of sad that people would resort to personal attacks on her, even if she does some work for an organization we now have a pretty low opinion of.

Anyway, if any ECA folk haven't been scared off by some of the less civil people here, I'd be really curious to hear some more details about the people exploiting ECA's system. To me, that's one of the more irritating things about this whole mess. It's repeatedly been thrown out as the reason for making it more difficult to cancel a membership. The thing is, so far as I can tell the benefits that people were using weren't limited to 1-time-per-person. As in, there was no incentive to repeatedly join and cancel and join and cancel. In fact, before Hal made the memberships free, anyone joining and canceling multiple times would be paying a whole lot of extra money for access to the same benefits as if they'd just stayed a member. Even with the free memberships, there was no real benefit to joining multiple times, as anyone could claim as many unique Amazon codes as they wanted on their membership.

To me, this whole thing looks like it was set up to be a scam from the moment Amazon agreed to the 10%-off codes. They were used to bait in as many paying members as would join. I was among that number. I hadn't heard of the ECA before and it seemed like a decent organization with a neat promotion for members, so I paid to join.

Then, after the rate of new paid members leveled out, Hal announces free memberships to people. Whatever arrangement Amazon had with the ECA, I doubt it included unlmited 10% discounts to anyone that wanted them. A flood of people join the ECA thinking they're getting a no-strings-attached discount. Amazon gets pissed and suspends the promotion. Worried that a bunch of people will now cancel their enrollment, the ECA changes its TOS to make it difficult for people to leave.

Maybe some of the above is wrong, but its certainly how it appears to someone relatively new to your organization. And when Hal starts throwing out BS spin on why the changes were made, it only makes it seem more likely that the whole thing was intended to rip people off from the start.[/QUOTE]

sums it up on point!
i was one of the people who joined for free (as they did advertise it), but i was actually considering paying before that. but once they did make it free - all the exploiters and 'stackers' jumped on board, which is messed up, and whoever did it should be ashamed of ruining it for the rest of us.
however, ECA should have realized that this kind of thing happens to anything that goes from $20 to FREE!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top