ECA: Hal Halpin's Latest Statement: Changes are Coming

Status
Not open for further replies.

caltab

CAGiversary!
Feedback
20 (100%)
The new discussion thread is located HERE.


Latest update:

I recommend everyone read Hal's latest statement, it's his best statement to date and I believe shows the ECA finally has gotten our message. In it he offers better explanations for what happened with the auto-renew function, promises to notify members of changes to terms of service, and even apologizes.
http://www.gameculture.com/2009/12/...lpin-eca-head-discusses-membership-complaints

Disclosure: GameCulture(the source of this statement) is published by the Entertainment Consumers Association.

Can you give us a synopsis of what happened over the past week?
Sure. Back in September we had an intersection of a few things happen within a brief period of time: I wrote a guest editorial in one of the leading games magazines, at the end of which I provided readers with a coupon code for a free trial membership.
Stopping there for a minute, in hindsight, what was the result of that action?
Well, I have to say that I didn't think the decision through thoroughly-enough. My logic was that readers who took the time to read the piece, which focused on some of the more important and topical issues facing game consumers, were people we wanted as members. In the few seconds that it took to type, I didn't consider that one of those readers would run over to their computer and post the code, sans editorial - and in retrospect, it appears obvious.
Next, there was an issue with discount codes from a partner?
Well, sorta.’ We were being supplied with batches of codes from that partner for some time - about six months. And the organization had been growing steadily for the past few years, so one of the challenges we both had was anticipating the redemption rate, batch to batch...which meant accurately predicting new membership growth. That's an unknown quantity for any new business, but more so for a new non-profit that's cutting a new path. But the more time went on the better we got at understanding the influencers, like trade and consumer shows, advertising, co-marketing efforts, promotions, etc.
That's where detractors repeatedly point to the new free trial members being problematic?
It's correct that our critics keep saying that, but it's a false statement. Yes, there was a bump in new membership acquisition during that period, but it was modest... comparatively speaking... and we knew it was coming, so we requested a larger than normal-sized batch. That request was met with more than we asked for and an emergency back-up batch being supplied.
And how did those assumptions and projections play-out?
Pretty much as-expected. Our partners - this one included - were thrilled with our growth. After all, more members equals more potential customers. And with there being only a few in each category of business, that's a great strategic advantage for the merchant. Competitors, who we hadn't yet contracted, were very likely losing customers. And the partners were essentially getting new loyal customers from a very different demographic than they have traditionally. The discount of 10% could easily be rationalized as customer acquisition expense, though I have no insight into any of our sponsor's thinking or rationale. It could have just as easily been that they wanted to support the org and believe in what we're building and doing.
So the influx of new comped members wasn't an issue?
Not at all. We were all pleased. And it seemed as though - even though many of the new members weren't folks who read the article - they quickly got what the ECA is and that there's a lot more to it than all of the perks and discounts.
And next...
Next, we depleted the codes pretty quickly...a bit faster than expected, but not by much. Plus we had the back-up batch, which we implemented fairly quickly. After six months of experience, users were familiar with the process and knew the timeframe required for the merchant to create new unique one-time use codes, get them over to us, and for our IT folks to upload them into the back-end. The problem came when users found that each batch of codes were programmed slightly differently and if you exploited that difference you could essentially "game" the system - tricking it into "stacking" with codes from a different batch.
What did that "stacking" entail?
We notified the partner that there was an issue with their programming and that there was an exploit that some -albeit very few - people were taking advantage of. Those users were reporting that they could stack the coupons. Instead of getting 10% off, they could get 20%.
Wow. Once that got out it must have been pandemonium?
Not really. The partner requested a code attrition and usage report, which we provided, and they began doing their own analysis. Despite what you'll hear from the trade, retail margins don't leave a lot of room for promotions for 20% off, traditionally. But the number of people exploiting the system was fairly small as a percentage. The problem was exacerbated by a land rush for codes by opportunistic members. The way the system was designed permitted any one member to download one coupon at a time, use it once and have to log back in to retrieve another. Though they had just begun working on a long-awaited multi-use code... one which could be assigned one per member and used multiple times. There was also some discussion about tying their membership account to their merchant one, for the same purpose.
That sounds like a logical solution. But that never developed?
No. During that same time, we began throttling the code distribution process...so that users could only download one per day, temporarily, solving the problem. Users quickly realized that if they quit the association, many calling our Accounting department directly, they could quit and re-join, using the free trial offer, and download an infinite number of codes. A related issue with that was that our emergency supply was then depleted much faster than we anticipated. Some of those users... again, very few, began uploading them to re-sell on eBay. That practice was a breach of their membership agreement, but the financial rewards of joining for free, downloading coupons for free and then selling them, was very appealing to them. Our Legal department worked with eBay to get those auctions removed, but the herculean work which resulted in very fast removals, was done by many of our new members - who appreciated the fact that if this wasn't stopped, it would likely result in an end to the promotion. They were really great.
How did you address closing the loophole?
Well, this is yet another one of the confluence of factors that occurred: we were doing a system-wide upgrade to the back-end software that runs the sites. Each time we build or customize modules it's a learning process. Again, there aren't any other non-profit entertainment consumer organizations to model after, so it's very often a matter of building what we think we'll need, having it be scalable, and then watching how well it addresses our needs. In doing the upgrade, the development company left a non-functioning button "live" that shouldn't have been. I believe it was for about three weeks that a feature that looked to disable auto-renewing of one's account could be selected - giving them the false impression that our software - and our architecture - was able to accommodate that request. So just to reiterate, it never worked.
I can see how that would present a problem.
Indeed. Since our staffers are all members, we wouldn't see the option to know that it was there. We, of course, had the developers remove the button as soon as we were made aware. Since it would be a year before those folks would have to renew - and the vast majority of them were the new free trial folks - we knew we had some time to sort through it, rectify the problem and explain the situation to those effected users - with our apologies and a token of our thanks for their understanding. But the code problems persisted while the partner sorted through things and worked on the new solution. Stacking three codes from three batches yielded a 30% discount and those using the exploit were getting more and more aggressive in the size of their orders - no longer buying a game or two. Joining, getting a code, calling and quitting, re-joining and getting another code and placing ever-larger orders was the breaking point. Plus, those contacting us weren't particularly pleasant to deal with when confronted about the practice.
So you've got a real problem brewing now and not a lot of options for solving it?
Exactly. We changed the method for quitting the association temporarily to mailing in the notice. The rationale was that the only people we'd ever... to the best of my knowledge... had leave the org before, were people who forgot to renew or update their credit cards and there were very few of those. By requesting that members mail in a termination notice, the only people affected were those taking advantage of the system and they were none-too-pleased with the move. If you thought they were difficult to deal with before, they were now incensed. Communications devolved into very very rude and abusive voicemail and email messages. Our staff wasn't prepared for that or for the vulgarity. I didn't want anyone having to deal with that, nor should they have to.
Did the codes come back?
No. As the partner was working on their single code solution, it all was coming to a head. We ran out of the balance of the emergency batch and were awaiting the newly enhanced codes - a process that had taken from one to two weeks before. We removed the ads which promoted that discount and dealt with the feedback from members who were getting increasingly impatient for the next batch. A few people even sent nasty emails to the merchant in an effort to make them aware of their displeasure with having to wait. Some other members started getting angry that an advertised promotion wasn't online, so they accused us of bait-and-switch and became more threatening. We updated the sponsor's listing on the partnership page to indicate that they were still supportive of the org and our efforts, but that the promotion was suspended, as we didn't know if or when another would be offered. But changing the language just made those who were upset even more angry, demanding that we somehow force the partner to provide another offer. But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
Wow! OK. I didn't realize that tensions were so high?
No one did. We're talking about a very small group of people to be fair, but they were free trial members who wanted initially to get a refund and then later demanded that their membership not auto-renew until and unless more discounts came available. We responded back letting them know that more, in fact, had come online and several more were almost contracted and done, but that the button they thought they used wasn't functional. They demanded that we bring it back online and weren't happy to learn that it just wasn't that simple. When they heard that we wanted a mailed letter for termination, they went viral and began a coordinated campaign to attack the association.
But if the group was so small, how effective could they be?
Again, playing Monday morning quarterback, I can say that I had no idea. They continued escalating the situation and incensing other members, rallying them to their cause. We heard the feedback on wanting to have the option of not auto-renewing online, which made a lot of sense, but wasn't an option with the current design. They began reaching out to several media outlets, telling them that we were running a scam and taking their money without giving them the option to leave or not auto-renew. We were blindsided.
...which was when you released the reaction statement?
Right. I tried to explain the situation and address the concerns of members who were becoming aware of issues by reading the stories. They had no idea what was going on and out of context, panicked, and rightly-so. Out of context we sound like horrible greedy people and they sound like victims who've been taken advantage of. The release was intended to answer questions, allay concerns and explain what the actions of this group have done. Unfortunately, it wasn't received by everyone that way. I never meant to offend and I certainly apologize.
Were there a lot of people upset by the release?
No, not that we're aware of. I think the vast majority of members weren't even aware that there was a problem and those who were and read the statement largely took it the way it was intended. I think the folks that I upset probably read the statement via one of the blogs on-going coverage - which usually included negative commentary from the writer. Those folks, having read it that way and reading the ensuing comments below those articles, were really concerned - wondering what happened to the association and what was going on. In the mean time, a few people continued to escalate their attacks, from personal assaults on staff members in the form of slander and libel, to inciting others to contact the Better Business Bureau (BBB), then the Attorney General's (AG) office and then finally our partners, merchants and credit card providers. They demanded that we reinstitute the non-functioning button and permit them to cancel by phone and email - while, all the time, communicating that message in as hateful and vile a correspondence as you can imagine.
What was the reaction from all of the people they were trying to convince not work with ECA anymore?
Really great. Most reacted by saying that they understood the situation and they have similar problems from time to time. The BBB folks also were very understanding and we're continuing to work with them, providing them with whatever documentation and information they request. We had one partner temporarily suspend their current offer for members, wanting to wait to see how the situation was resolved. And we had another who was approached directly by the inciters, who who chose to side with them - but to be fair, he very likely knew nothing of the situation at the time. Everyone else reaffirmed their commitment to the association and, in a few examples, even provided us with valuable feedback.
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
Was that a concern as well?
Only recently. I believe that came to the surface from one of the newer folks who was generally concerned after reading all of the different forums posts. They looked through our membership agreement and came across a section where we state that we could alter expiration dates to process their renewals. It was part of the boiler plate. And again, makes sense in context: I want to renew, but my card just expired. Having that clause would enable us to make the transaction go through, so it never occurred to anyone that it was a bad thing. We never used it and couldn’t imagine other circumstances under which we would. But it was spun or interpreted to mean that we're going to renew you whether you like it or not! I can appreciate that concern, especially framed with all of the other stuff; so, after discussing it, we removed that section entirely.. Legalese, while complex out of necessity sometimes, can also be made clear. I believe that's been our position with EULA standardizations, generally, as well.
There was also some question about how best to communicate to the membership?
Yes, some members asked if we could communicate any significant changes to the membership agreement – such as our removal/rewording of that sub-section we just discussed. As a result of that suggestion, we said that that’s fair and the best way to do so would be via our member’s only monthly newsletter, going forward.
Are you concerned with how this has been playing out?
Of course, very. It’s been grueling on our staff and especially on our forums moderators, who have been on the front lines. On the other hand, getting feedback from members – when it’s communicated civilly – can be really productive. A lot of the things we’ve discussed reflect that open channel of communications where they provide suggestions and comments and we can assess the need and determine how best to address it. But it’s when those lines of communication fall apart, and the discussions happen on other forums, that it’s less productive.
So why take the ECA forums off-line?
Fair enough. That was my decision. Having read all of the discussion and debate all of the issues, it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered. All of the opinions had been stated and as many of the updates that were available were posted. We hadn’t done a major update to the system – with security patches, with new features and new registration criteria – in some time, so it seemed like a good place to give everyone a break. Like with the other things we’ve said we’re working on, so too will the forums be addressed.
Other major online gaming services have had similar problems with user complaints, why is it so much more emotional with this situation?
With online gaming services, they’re delivering much more of a product than a service in my estimation. So when they went through backlash from users who were upset with their termination policies, there was that difference. Then there’s the fact that many – although not most – of our concerned members were the free trial folks, who didn’t have to pay to join. As compared with the members who did, there may be a mind frame difference. Gaming services cost money; there’s a value proposition, users weigh the pros and cons and commit to join or not. With ECA, we go through that same process, albeit at a much lower price threshold, and the reasons for joining are less about value for the dollar – again, referring to the paid users – and more about what the org does holistically. My guess is that the paid folks are more likely to be involved actively in our advocacy efforts, reading our newsletters and publications and generally aware of the non-benefits areas in which we’re involved. Similarly, the free trial members are probably more likely to be aware of the latest partners and offers that we’ve added as member benefits. That said, our members have an emotional connection with ECA that they probably don’t have – at least in the same way – with an online gaming service.
So where are you now and what’s the plan for moving forward?
As was addressed in the FAQ, we’re working on adding a new module for online account termination as one of the lead priorities. Since they’ve been down this road and had the back and forth with their customers, we can be fairly sure that the systems that are being used now are ones that our folks will be comfortable with. Getting an option to remove auto-renewals will also be addressed in this same build-out, as will be the notification date.
And where does the ECA stand with those members who still want to cancel?
Well, I’d hope that they’d understand that we’re working to address the issues that we’ve discussed at length here, but that these things do take time. I know that asking patience at an emotionally-charged time isn’t the easiest, but I think they’ll feel assured that we haven’t mislead them as they begin to see each of these things come to fruition. If they still decide to part ways, I can’t say that I understand, but I can say that I respect their decision. Look, all of this is new – to them and to us. We need to just do the best that we can and work toward solutions that we’re all comfortable with. That’s really the best that we can do and I hope that they’re willing to be a part of that.
Is there anything else you’d like to add regarding the issue?
Yeah, again, just to restate my sincere apology for anyone who was offended by our statement last week, who felt unintentionally lumped-in with the group that I was referencing. That was never my intention, and feel badly for not being more clear. It really is in all our best interests to work together, learn from the issue and continue to focus on the important work that still needs to be done.


In my opinion, if the ECA follows through with what he's saying they will have done a lot to fix this. Also, a lot of his explanation and tone is much friendlier and clearer. They seemed to be listening to ours and others concerns and making right. For that, I applaud them.

12/9: The ECA has removed the section of the TOS referring to their ability to change your CC's expiration date, again a positive change that they should be commended for.


--------------
12/7 update:

Latest word from the ECA's Gypsyfly:
"Right now ECA is working on implementing an online option for members which will require creating a new business, accounting, and site module as the site never had this option. They will also notify members of policies changes via their members newsletters even though they are not required to, some items in the TOS will also be updated moving forward to better reflect the needs of members."

I'd recommend waiting a bit before spending the time and money on a certified letter, we'll hopefully be able to cancel a more convenient way soon.

...........

12/4 update: the eca has a new faq that includes info about canceling. They still require written notice. While they say it doesn't need to be traceable, I'd still recommend it given part 12 of their terms. They also now say they are working on another way to cancel and an option to disable auto renew.
http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?t=7158
What is the annual membership fee?
The annual dues for membership in the ECA are $19.99 per year for normal membership, and $14.99 for student and military members (with a valid dot edu or dot mil domain extension). To join the association, click here.

What benefits are there associated with ECA membership?
The organization is dedicated to providing a wealth of community and affinity benefits to our members.* With membership, you can connect with like-minded gamers, explore career and educational opportunities in the business, start or join one of our network of chapters across the US and Canada, and much more.*Take a few minutes to check out our website to explore the advocacy issues that we work on, the empowerment tools that we provide, the accomplishments we’ve made and the other benefits of membership. We also have a more general FAQ, which may be helpful, available here.

What do I get in terms of actual dollar value for my $19.99 dues?
The member benefits section of the website provides a detailed explanation, but our goal is to provide members with access to a whole host of goods and services, such as low cost insurance, to advocacy campaigns, to discounts with retail partners. As a member of the ECA, you should be spending considerably less each year on goods and services because you’ll have access to them through us at a much cheaper/more compelling rate(s). The list is fairly long and is constantly being updated with new offers, but members can access the full roster of offers on the site.

Since the ECA is a non-profit, are my dues payments tax-deductable?
No. The association is a 501(c)(4) non-profit membership organization. You may be thinking of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. For more information about the differences between different classifications of non-profits, try here.

Once I join will my membership auto-renew?
Yes. At the time of your registration, you are asked to provide a major credit card so that on your anniversary date you can be automatically renewed for the following year as standard practice – not dissimilar to parallel membership organizations or major online gaming services. Nearing your anniversary date we remind you that your term is coming to an end so that you can take action to update your credit card information or cancel your membership.

Can I choose to have my membership NOT auto-renew online?
The system is presently not set up for this, but due to membership feedback we have been actively working on solutions that should make it so. We’re modeling some of the other leading online games services and membership associations, so the process should be familiar and use best practices.

Wasn’t there a button that I could check to deselect auto-renewing?
For a brief period of time, some users may have seen a non-functioning button that referred to cancelling auto-renewal. This was due to developer error during a system upgrade to the back-end. It was removed as soon as we were made aware to avoid confusion and because it never had that functionality. However, the new enhancements we’re working on will address this option.

What happens if my credit card expires?
The ECA requires all members in good standing to have updated credit cards on file. This is for several reasons, not the least of which is that the system was designed to reduce overhead and back-end expenses. The credit card disclaimer – which can be found right above the section where new members are prompted for their details – explains that the card will not be charged again until your anniversary date (not unlike other non-profit membership organizations, online gaming services, or health club memberships for that matter). If new members are unwilling or unable to fully complete their registration information, we do not process their application. If your credit card expires or is lost/stolen, your profile must be updated so that you have a valid credit card capable of paying your dues on file with the association. The ECA does not automatically update expired credit cards.

Can I cancel my membership at any time?
You may terminate your active membership in the association at any time. However, refund requests will not be processed. Like with any other membership org, many of the benefits are accessible immediately upon joining. If this policy were not in place, people could join the association, take advantage of the benefits and seek a refund immediately afterward. It is disclosed in your Membership Terms & Conditions, which you can find here.

How do I cancel my membership?
While we build out the new accounting module, discussed above, we cannot accept emailed or voicemail cancellation requests at this time. We understand that it may be frustrating, but we ask for your patience while we work to enhance the system. In the interim, if you wish to cancel your ECA membership, simply send us a letter to the address listed below. (A certified letter is not required.) Please include your full membership details (full contact info and in as much detail as possible). Your membership will be terminated once processed and you will receive correspondence back, confirming your cancellation.

Entertainment Consumers Association (ECA)
Attn: Accounting Department
64 Danbury Rd, Suite 700
Wilton, CT *06897

What if I prefer not to send a letter to cancel my membership?
Until the new system is implemented, we can only accept mailed cancellation requests. We thank you for your patience and understanding during this time and will share the details of the update shortly.

Where can I find the ECA’s Privacy Policy, Terms of Membership and Membership Agreement?
As a consumer advocacy organization, the rights of consumers are the ECA’s priority. We also have a fiduciary responsibility to the organization as a whole and to the members individually. For those reasons our policies and agreements are modeled after the leading non-profit membership organizations and are available at the bottom of every page of our website. But for quick reference, our Privacy Policy can be found here and our Membership Terms & Conditions, here.

I’ve joined the association, but am having trouble accessing my account or logging-in.

Welcome! The system will send an authentication email to the address you provided in the first step, as well as a registration message acknowledging your complimentary subscription to ECA Today, our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter. You must click on the link in the authentication email to proceed to step two and finalize your registration. If you received the newsletter email, you will likely also receive the authentication message. Check your spam folder. If you didn’t receive either message, or you didn’t receive the authentication email after a short period of time, it may be that your ISP is blocking the email, or our message triggered something in your router’s filter settings. Just email us for additional help.

Does the ECA offer working journalists complimentary memberships?
We do offer members of the media a limited number of complimentary memberships in the association. For all media inquiries, please email [email protected] to communicate directly with our public relations staff.

How can I find out more about what the ECA is doing or has accomplished?
If you want to know how to get involved in any of the issue areas in which we’re engaged, try our action center here. We also keep members abreast of our activities via our week-nightly HTML-based newsletter, ECA Today, as well as our Monthly Member Newsletter, which broadly keeps you informed. And if you still have a question, comment or concern, you could always try our Forums.

I’d like to get the word out and help recruit new members, is there an affiliate program in place?
Yes. ECA is both a Publisher and Advertiser with Commission Junction, which is how we work with affiliate partners, so we would refer you to their website to connect via their portal, here.
Last edited by ezacharyk; Today at 08:29 PM.

I am pleased progress is being made, I still strongly feel they need to send an email to all members stating that the disable auto renew feature was never functioning. Also, while they say the feature was only available for a short time, there are indications it was available as far back as March and as late as the end of October (thanks blisskr for finding these posts). I wouldn't consider that a short period time, certainly its long enough to necessitate personal notice to all of their members. Please also note a mod responds to the March post and makes no mention of its non-functionality. I would also think that means they should have known about the button as early March, yet it was not removed until several months later. Additionally, according to several CAGs, the nonfunctional button gave verification that the auto renewal feature was canceled. It's very difficult to trust someone with your credit card information if such a major mistake is left on their website for months.


................

I am well aware that this is not a deal and many will flame me and say this is the wrong forum or that this is a re-post. However, at one point it seems like the majority of CAGs gave these people their credit card information in order to sign up for a paid or "free" membership. It should be emphasized that everyone who became a member(including free ones) had to give their credit card info, in case you have forgotten. Many if not all who signed up immediately canceled the auto renew billing feature using the website. It appears that it is now ECA's stance that anyone who did this did not actually cancel because it was never a working part of their website. They claim that the auto renew feature was only available for a limited time and never actually did anything because of some glitch, but anecdotal evidence from CAGs suggest it was online for several weeks and possibly months. Up to this point, they have refused to adequately accept responsibility for this mistake and have failed to personally notify their members of this problem. The original thread where I got this info from is found here, full credit should be given to Cager arcane93 for pointing all this out in this thread.

The ONLY way you can cancel your membership is by a letter through some form of TRACEABLE mail.

send your cancellation here, which according to their terms must be sent 30 days prior to your renewal date:
[FONT=&quot]Attn: Accounting, ECA, 64 Danbury Road, Suite 700, Wilton, CT 06897-4406. [/FONT]

What info is needed to cancel?
Just say you want to cancel and include your full name and email.

THERE IS NO WAY TO TURN OFF AUTO RENEW- you can only cancel your membership, they say here that "You will be notified a month before hand of your account expiring. So you have time to cancel if you decided to do so." But according to section 4 of their terms you must cancel 30 days prior to your renewal date. Obviously, this is highly problematic.

---for those concerned about potential unwanted charges: the charge shows up as: "ENT. CONSUMER ASSOC" Phone number 203-761-6180 CT"

Here are some tidbits from the ECA mod's themselves, taken from their forum:

Was there a button for auto-renewing?
Yes, for some browsers, but it wasn’t intended to be there, wasn’t a working option and was removed as soon as we became aware

Why can’t we terminate via email?
Because the org has grown too large to handle the volume and requiring a mailed piece separates those who are serious from those who are lazy or finicky – joining and leaving repeatedly – and it gives us written documentation, a paper trail to reconcile against

Notable Parts of their terms of service:

[FONT=&quot]5.[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Right to update Credit Card Account Information[/FONT][FONT=&quot]. If the credit card provided by Member to ECA has expired during an attempt to bill fees per section 4, ECA will revise the expiration date and proceed with billing using the same credit card account.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='J7.']Hal's post... :roll:[/QUOTE]
But what point are you trying to make? Or was it just a random post attempting to troll? You make a one sentence accusation, then don't bother to explain it?

Or are you upset that the stackers ruined the discount? Your post leaves a lot to interpretation...
 
The ECA keeps making mistake after mistake, and the misinformation is really ridiculous.

I can't wait to be done with them. What a mistake.

Luckily, the CC# I gave them is no longer valid.
-Mike
 
[quote name='J7.']New info about what the stackers did came up thanks to Hal that is why people post about it again...[/QUOTE]
Thoughts on the stacking issue aside, I think it's pretty clear by now that we can't take Halpin's statements at face value.
 
[quote name='J7.']Ya it's obvious you don't believe anything Hal has or will ever have to say.[/QUOTE]
leonharfs? Is that you?! :lol:

The free ECA membership ruined the codes. Every Tom, Dick and Harry had access to them, which is why they ran out of codes almost instantly. Halpin did not think about the consequences of his releasing a free membership to a group that normally required $20. I know as a paying member, it pissed me off.
I had a gut feeling that the Amazon codes would soon go the way of the Dodo bird before any stacking occured. Too many people were using them too quickly.
I'm guessing Amazon got tired of having to make new codes every few days once the free ECA membership was out on every site and the new members were exhausting codes. I know many of you ECA-apologists and Sour-Grapers would like to solely blame CAG for stacking codes but the internet is a big place people.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
[quote name='J7.']Ya it's obvious you don't believe anything Hal has or will ever have to say.[/QUOTE]

Yeah you finally get it! I don't believe people who betray trust and prove they are blatant liars. Next question?
 
[quote name='J7.']Let's not play dumb... you passed the blame on everything else you could for the Amazon discount leaving instead of accepting the blame yourself as a person who stacked a shitload.[/QUOTE]
Lol, the power of one? I'm flattered and will personally take credit for killing the Amazon codes.
 
[quote name='Lawyers Guns N Money']But what point are you trying to make? Or was it just a random post attempting to troll? You make a one sentence accusation, then don't bother to explain it?

Or are you upset that the stackers ruined the discount? Your post leaves a lot to interpretation...[/QUOTE]
I was surprised to find out that the stackers & those who wished to stack & to a lesser extent those who wanted to use codes asap were also the ones to complain, threaten, etc the ECA which directly resulted in the multi-use code that was on its way being stopped and never arriving. It's obvious we know a lot of those people were from CAG where I distinctly remember the complaining, threatening, etc taking place back then and stories about how they did it on the ECA forums.
 
[quote name='J7.']Ya it's obvious you don't believe anything Hal has or will ever have to say.[/QUOTE]

I think a better question is why do you? I don't know him personally, and based on the weasely actions/statements he's made throughout this ordeal, I'm not really inclined to just start taking his word for things now. I'm not saying it's not true, but he's said a lot of things that were merely damage control and PR spin to save face. For what reason should we believe this one specific detail?
 
[quote name='mm07']The ECA keeps making mistake after mistake, and the misinformation is really ridiculous.

I can't wait to be done with them. What a mistake.

Luckily, the CC# I gave them is no longer valid.
-Mike[/QUOTE]

But then they will send it to collections...or something.

When I read the title I thought that they brought back the Amazon codes just to make everyone happy....again long shot but I was hoping
 
[quote name='J7.']I was surprised to find out that the stackers & those who wished to stack & to a lesser extent those who wanted to use codes asap were also the ones to complain, threaten, etc the ECA which directly resulted in the multi-use code that was on its way being stopped and never arriving. It's obvious we know a lot of those people were from CAG where I distinctly remember the complaining, threatening, etc taking place back then and stories about how they did it on the ECA forums.[/QUOTE]
So you think the ECA told Amazon to forget the multi-use code (which would have been a huge selling point for them in the future, and also prevented any of this dastardly stacking) and scrap the promotion altogether because they were getting emails complaining about the lack of codes? In that case, Hal would like to ensure your credit card is going to be valid next year.

[quote name='J7.']Nah I just take this as being Hal's way of finally being real and taking the time to answer questions truthfully because he realizes how bad things have gotten for the ECA due in large part to their own mistakes.[/quote]... he wrote the questions to answer.
 
[quote name='J7.']I was surprised to find out that the stackers & those who wished to stack & to a lesser extent those who wanted to use codes asap were also the ones to complain, threaten, etc the ECA which directly resulted in the multi-use code that was on its way being stopped and never arriving. It's obvious we know a lot of those people were from CAG where I distinctly remember the complaining, threatening, etc taking place back then and stories about how they did it on the ECA forums.[/QUOTE]

Link? Source? Anything?
 
[quote name='jaynatch']Yeah you finally get it! I don't believe people who betray trust and prove they are blatant liars. Next question?[/QUOTE]
Nah I just take this as being Hal's way of finally being real and taking the time to answer questions truthfully because he realizes how bad things have gotten for the ECA due in large part to their own mistakes.

[quote name='Jodou']Lol, the power of one? I'm flattered and will personally take credit for killing the Amazon codes.[/QUOTE]
Your sarcasm is wonderful because whether you meant it or not, it is certifiably evident.
 
[quote name='J7.']Stackers ruined the Amazon discount and then complained, threatened, etc enough to ruin it from coming back when it was just about to. Wow.[/QUOTE]

Wow indeed. I thought you were being sarcastic but it looks like you're serious.

Either you will accept anything written on a website or you're completely clueless or you're just a troll. Either way you are a sorry sorry individual.

Anyone who has read all the arguments in this case would clearly conclude that WHAT THE ECA DID HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH STACKERS. It's just a convenient excuse for them.


You can blame the stackers all you want for the codes going away. That's a different argument and one I would rather not rehash.
But this is about you being jedi mind tricked by Hal. (which Obi Wan says only works on the simple minded.)
 
Still, not everyone will be informed of the changes. You can opt out of the newsletter.
This issue requires it's own email, not to be buried in a newsletter that not everyone gets.
A good subject line: "ECA notice, IMPORTANT changes to your online account"
 
[quote name='botticus']So you think the ECA told Amazon to forget the multi-use code (which would have been a huge selling point for them in the future, and also prevented any of this dastardly stacking) and scrap the promotion altogether because they were getting emails complaining about the lack of codes? In that case, Hal would like to ensure your credit card is going to be valid next year.

... he wrote the questions to answer.[/QUOTE]

[quote name='theloserboy']Link? Source? Anything?[/QUOTE]
OP...
But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.
 
[quote name='tim44']Still, not everyone will be informed of the changes. You can opt out of the newsletter.[/QUOTE]

Hell, you don't have to opt out. I never opted out, the "subscribe to newsletter" box is checked on my account profile and has always been checked, and I have not once in my entire time as an ECA member received a newsletter. I don't think I'm the only one who has had this issue.
 
[quote name='J7.']OP...
But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.[/QUOTE]
That says "because Amazon didn't put due diligence into their promotional code development, stacking, whether intentional or unintentional, was getting to be too much." And then you can see my first post on this subject this morning. Hopefully after reading that you will get back to December 8 where the Amazon codes are ancient history and merely a catalyst for the current issues.
 
[quote name='J7.']OP...
But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.[/QUOTE]
Why even bother reading his verbal diarrhea? You accuse me of blaming everyone but myself yet you readily jump into Hal's arms when he does the same? You might be shocked to know that people lie.
 
[quote name='confoosious']Wow indeed. I thought you were being sarcastic but it looks like you're serious.

Either you will accept anything written on a website or you're completely clueless or you're just a troll. Either way you are a sorry sorry individual.

Anyone who has read all the arguments in this case would clearly conclude that WHAT THE ECA DID HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH STACKERS. It's just a convenient excuse for them.


You can blame the stackers all you want for the codes going away. That's a different argument and one I would rather not rehash.
But this is about you being jedi mind tricked by Hal. (which Obi Wan says only works on the simple minded.)[/QUOTE]
You agree that stackers ruined the discount, but you don't agree that they prevented it from coming back despite Hal stating this. If you think everyone is always lying to you all the time then fine keep living that way, but when shit hits the fan sometimes people do try to be honest and save their organization before it implodes.

[quote name='botticus']That says "because Amazon didn't put due diligence into their promotional code development, stacking, whether intentional or unintentional, was getting to be too much." And then you can see my first post on this subject this morning. Hopefully after reading that you will get back to December 8 where the Amazon codes are ancient history and merely a catalyst for the current issues.[/QUOTE]
Amazon was doing that precisely with the multi-use code.
 
[quote name='botticus']That says "because Amazon didn't put due diligence into their promotional code development, stacking, whether intentional or unintentional, was getting to be too much." And then you can see my first post on this subject this morning. Hopefully after reading that you will get back to December 8 where the Amazon codes are ancient history and merely a catalyst for the current issues.[/QUOTE]
Amazon was doing that precisely with the multi-use code.
 
[quote name='J7.']OP...
But shortly after, we heard what we were dreading: that the exploits and comments were just getting to be too much. Had there been just a little more time or patience, the new multi-use codes would have come in and all would have been well.[/QUOTE]
121181-wtf_picard-468x.jpg

:roll:
Why are you so quick to believe Halpin?
 
Reason for closing forums "it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered"

With Hal's logic, the forums should be taken down permanently.
 
[quote name='J7.']You agree that stackers ruined the discount, but you don't agree that they prevented it from coming back despite Hal stating this. If you think everyone is always lying to you all the time then fine keep living that way, but when shit hits the fan sometimes people do try to be honest and save their organization before it implodes.[/QUOTE]

Hal has lied to us repeatedly about everything. Why would we accept it? I can't believe you are buying everything he says. Yeah, Amazon codes were coming back. And the Detroit Lions are winning the Super Bowl this year. The fact that no one would be stupid enough to believe this leads me to believe that you are just trolling.

So....

Now, ask yourself this. What does canceling and rejoining have to do with stacking? This is the ECA's stance on why the TOS were changed and why snail mail is required now. Hal says it's because of the exploiters constantly joining and canceling. If you can explain why, I'll leave permanently. If you can't, you need to STFU.

Challenge issued.
 
Nice apology letter, however, I still think not having a functioning auto-renew cancellation is a farce. If you are already collection a user's info, including his/her cc, how much harder is it to implement the cancellation button. As a programmer, it is not that hard at all.

With a new system structure being implemented, sure there may be loopholes associated with the db tables on the backend, but I'm sure if they go through the trouble of autorenewing (aka looking up the date of expiration), there is a way of sending a flag not to auto-renew.

ECA has somewhat rebounded in my opinion, but I still will not support them going forward.
 
[quote name='tim44']Reason for closing forums "it seemed to me that it had all been asked and answered"[/QUOTE]
Well they also needed to apply some "security patches" don't ya know. Because right in the middle of a giant PR controversy is a fantastic time for that. :roll:
 
We need a separate thread for all of these people who want to bitch about stackers, since that's not the point here at all. Really, if Hal's goal was to push things off course, he's very nearly accomplished it.
 
[quote name='arcane93']We need a separate thread for all of these people who want to bitch about stackers, since that's not the point here at all. Really, if Hal's goal was to push things off course, he's very nearly accomplished it.[/QUOTE]

Yes he has. He's put out the smokescreen and the morons are falling for it.

Well done, Hal.
 
[quote name='arcane93']We need a separate thread for all of these people who want to bitch about stackers, since that's not the point here at all. Really, if Hal's goal was to push things off course, he's very nearly accomplished it.[/QUOTE]
Hal's attempt to deflect the weak minded has succeeded.
 
[quote name='J7.']You agree that stackers ruined the discount, but you don't agree that they prevented it from coming back despite Hal stating this. If you think everyone is always lying to you all the time then fine keep living that way, but when shit hits the fan sometimes people do try to be honest and save their organization before it implodes.
[/QUOTE]

I realize that Hal genuinely feels like the victim here, his intentions were more than likely genuine. But when he felt taken advantage of, he did a lot of stuff that was unethical, and then tried downplay that fact. You just can't run an organization like that. It still pisses me off that he isn't apologizing and he's still trying to prove that he's right. I never stacked codes, I never even used a single code (I know you think I'm lying because everyone must have joined to scam the ECA, believe what you want), I just wanted a legitimate way to cancel accounts, and notification about TOS changing and the button not working. That's all.
 
[quote name='confoosious']Yes he has. He's put out the smokescreen and the morons are falling for it.

Well done, Hal.[/QUOTE]

Same thing, same time, haha
 
[quote name='confoosious']Yes he has. He's put out the smokescreen and the morons are falling for it.[/QUOTE]
One of the most eye-opening things about this for me has been the response of the big gaming blogs and news sites to the controversy. Not that I necessarily expect hard-hitting investigative journalism, but the extent to which many of the sites just took Halpin's line at face value and didn't even ask any additional questions was distressing.
 
[quote name='confoosious']Hal has lied to us repeatedly about everything. Why would we accept it? I can't believe you are buying everything he says. Yeah, Amazon codes were coming back. And the Detroit Lions are winning the Super Bowl this year. The fact that no one would be stupid enough to believe this leads me to believe that you are just trolling.

So....

Now, ask yourself this. What does canceling and rejoining have to do with stacking? This is the ECA's stance on why the TOS were changed and why snail mail is required now. Hal says it's because of the exploiters constantly joining and canceling. If you can explain why, I'll leave permanently. If you can't, you need to STFU.

Challenge issued.[/QUOTE]
I don't feel like arguing with you because it will go nowhere and you are heavy on insulting people. That is a different issue than what I was talking about anyways. I think the canceling and rejoining was due to both what he claims and what you claim.

I take what Hal says with reservations. While I believe he may be telling the truth, of course I know he may not. What he says is definitely questionable but for the time being I believe him on the code issue.
 
[quote name='Lawyers Guns N Money']Hal's a Jedi?

/waves hand

"These are not the problems you're looking for.."[/QUOTE]
Exactly! lol
 
[quote name='confoosious']Yes he has. He's put out the smokescreen and the morons are falling for it.

Well done, Hal.[/QUOTE]

Honestly, the best thing to do would be to just not respond to them at all. Let them vent their frustrations in one post and ignore them. Clearly engaging them in discussion, when they've already made up their mind about everything, isn't going to go anywhere. As long as people keep taking the bait and responding, we're going to have to keep reading this shit.
 
[quote name='J7.']I don't feel like arguing with you because it will go nowhere and you are heavy on insulting people. That is a different issue than what I was talking about anyways. I think the canceling and rejoining was due to both what he claims and what you claim.

I take what Hal says with reservations. While I believe he may be telling the truth, of course I know he may not. What he says is definitely questionable but for the time being I believe him on the code issue.[/QUOTE]

You don't feel like arguing with me because you don't have a leg to stand on. I don't care what *I* claim. Hal claims the canceling and rejoining was exploiters gaming the system. You said he was right. Prove it. You can't. Because the stacking exploit had nothing to do with canceling.


Move along.

...


You know, the only publication that bothered to follow up instead of taking Hal at face value was arstechnica. Can someone with a wikipedia account add their article? http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/...p-their-attack-describe-exploits-cry-scam.ars

Also, please give kudos to Ben (no, i don't know him) because he actually followed up.
 
[quote name='Ryuukishi']One of the most eye-opening things about this for me has been the response of the big gaming blogs and news sites to the controversy. Not that I necessarily expect hard-hitting investigative journalism, but the extent to which many of the sites just took Halpin's line at face value and didn't even ask any additional questions was distressing.[/QUOTE]
The Consumerist posted (and I assume asked) additional questions, but it appears the ECA just ignored them.

Hal's too busy interviewing himself to respond to the actual issues.
 
[quote name='Lawyers Guns N Money']The Consumerist posted (and I assume asked) additional questions, but it appears the ECA just ignored them.

Hal's too busy interviewing himself to respond to the actual issues.[/QUOTE]
One of the last posts I remember reading on the ECA forums was a professional interviewer trying to get in touch with Hal.
 
I started reading up on this thread when the last post was 25. Crazy!

Anyway, I am not one that had signed up with the ECA, though I sure was close. I just kept putting it off and eventually it was out of sight and out of mind. I read this thread and am glad I didn't. Especially after reading over his Q and A segment.

Truthfully, what he says sounds iffy to me. He seems sincere in a lot of ways but I can't ignore the dense fog of arrogance and hidden aggression. This part really stuck out in my mind:

[quote name='caltab']
Do you have any sense of who these folks are?
Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?! Now again, I should be clear that when I refer to the core group, I'm referring to the same people we've been discussing all along; not everyone who is concerned, upset or anxious. I think that those folks were likely relieved to see a new FAQ that we posted in the forums, earlier this past weekend, which explains that we're working on an auto-renew process, that it'll be substantially-similar to other major online gaming services or membership orgs in its design, and that we don't alter their credit card information...
[/QUOTE]


"Absolutely. We know precisely who they are - we have all of their information, of course. Seriously?!"

This part specifically seems like he is still trying to be that lion. I laughed when I read that. Why even say something like that? As a threat?

Seriously, this guy is a joke and I will not ever sign up with the ECA as long as this guy is involved. I wish the best to those still dealing with this joker and I hope it all works out.
 
You guys are seriously wondering why all the questions were so easy? They weren't asked by a journalist, they were written by Hal himself. Just look at the bottom of the gameculture.com website:

Copyright © 2009 ECA. All rights reserved.
Game Culture and Game Culture logo are trademarks of the ECA.

There's clearly no bias there...
 
[quote name='jaynatch']You guys are seriously wondering why all the questions were so easy? They weren't asked by a journalist, they were written by Hal himself. Just look at the bottom of the gameculture.com website:



There's clearly no bias there...[/QUOTE]


Lol! That is hilarious! What a joke!
 
Nice catch, Jaynatch.

I think we should get a group of questions/points/concerns/complaints together and ask CheapyD or Wombat to approach ECA in a professional manner to see if they will address them, maybe in a CAGCast interview!!!
 
[quote name='youbastards']Nice catch, Jaynatch.

I think we should get a group of questions/points/concerns/complaints together and ask CheapyD or Wombat to approach ECA in a professional manner to see if they will address them, maybe in a CAGCast interview!!![/QUOTE]

I doubt they would respond. They've ignored Consumerist and Arstechnica. CAG is a deal site with 6-8 evildoers who want to start a revolution lol. :roll:
 
[quote name='jaynatch']I realize that Hal genuinely feels like the victim here, his intentions were more than likely genuine. But when he felt taken advantage of, he did a lot of stuff that was unethical, and then tried downplay that fact. You just can't run an organization like that. It still pisses me off that he isn't apologizing and he's still trying to prove that he's right. I never stacked codes, I never even used a single code (I know you think I'm lying because everyone must have joined to scam the ECA, believe what you want), I just wanted a legitimate way to cancel accounts, and notification about TOS changing and the button not working. That's all.[/QUOTE]
Ya I still hate the ECA and don't respect Hal much but I think he may be telling the truth at least about some stuff. The best thing he could do is to step down.

[quote name='confoosious']You don't feel like arguing with me because you don't have a leg to stand on. I don't care what *I* claim. Hal claims the canceling and rejoining was exploiters gaming the system. You said he was right. Prove it. You can't. Because the stacking exploit had nothing to do with canceling.


Move along.

...


You know, the only publication that bothered to follow up instead of taking Hal at face value was arstechnica. Can someone with a wikipedia account add their article? http://arstechnica.com/gaming/news/...p-their-attack-describe-exploits-cry-scam.ars

Also, please give kudos to Ben (no, i don't know him) because he actually followed up.[/QUOTE]
Dude whatever, shut up. You brought up an entirely different issue than what I was posting about. Again entirely different issue that I was never talking about at all. You just wanted to change the subject. Nice more insults :lol:. You can't prove anything anyways.
 
[quote name='arcane93']So, out of curiosity, has no one at all tried to post a comment on Hal's latest post, or are they blocking/deleting them? I'm shocked that there's still not a single comment on that page.[/QUOTE]


I tried, and it said that it was up for "moderation" or "approval" or something like that before it would be posted. Considering not one comment has appeared, I will assume none will. Or they will simply pick and choose what appears to help save face.
 
[quote name='arcane93']Honestly, the best thing to do would be to just not respond to them at all. Let them vent their frustrations in one post and ignore them. Clearly engaging them in discussion, when they've already made up their mind about everything, isn't going to go anywhere. As long as people keep taking the bait and responding, we're going to have to keep reading this shit.[/QUOTE]
Now where's the fun in that?!
 
[quote name='J7.']Ya I still hate the ECA and don't respect Hal much but I think he may be telling the truth at least about some stuff. The best thing he could do is to step down.[/QUOTE]

I agree. I do think some of what he said is legit, and to be fair I am sure he is stressed out beyond belief. However, it doesn't give him the right to still make threats or whatnot. I am with you on thinking he should step down, especially if he wants the membership levels to rise. I doubt CAG members or other folks will join if he is still in charge.
 
[quote name='J7.']Ya I still hate the ECA and don't respect Hal much but I think he may be telling the truth at least about some stuff. The best thing he could do is to step down.[/QUOTE]

I'm sure he is. But he put out the free trial codes, and if he was naive enough to think that no one would take advantage of the situation, he obviously doesn't use the internet. I agree that his resignation would be great, and I might even renew my membership were this to happen. I really want to like the ECA, but I can't and don't like Hal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top