[quote name='The Long Haired Bard']This.
The Michael Phelps analogy is a terrible one. It would be more like if he decided to use the same type of suit that other swimmers wear, rather than the high tech one him and several others wear.
As long as all the players at a tournament use the same controller it doesn't matter how good it is. Even if they just used the official MS ones, it would still be a level playing field, and skill would one out. Again, if the equipment playing field is EQUAL, skill will win out. You don't need to give everyone $100 controllers for that to happen.
Bottom line: if MLG Player A needs this controller to beat Player B (who let's say uses a standard MS one), then Player A isn't better than B; he just has better equipment.[/QUOTE]
Thats not the reality. The phelps analogy is valid. If you have choice in equipment for a competition then you should always go for the best equipment possible. Sports allows this so why not games. Basketball players can pick their shoes, olympic swimmers can pick their speedos, and volleyball players can pick their bikinis
People that compete at this high of a level don't suck. This is made for them. I've competed in several genres many years ago. I can still notice small things like how much input lag a tv has even though it may only be a frame or two. It all makes a difference. Sports is better when the athlete is able to perform at their optimal levels without any type of resistance. If we really want a level playing field then perhaps MLG should furnish all of their attendees with an option of using this controller or the standard.
This thing looks great. If it had a wireless option then i would definitely buy it at $99.