Full Auto Reviews & General Discussion

shipwreck

Moderator
Staff member
Feedback
91 (100%)
OXM 5.5
GameSpot 6.5
IGN 7.1
1UP 8.0
TeamXbox 7.1

GameRankings

Ouch, I think we all saw this one coming though. I've got it pre-ordered still, but I'm going to have to take a long hard look at this thing before I lay down $60.

They basically said that it was very bare bones with no story elements and very little to do.
 
I've got it in my Gamefly Q, it sounded interesting, but it's not the sort of game I'd buy sight unseen anyway
 
[quote name='shipwreck']Ouch, I think we all saw this one coming though. I've got it pre-ordered still, but I'm going to have to take a long hard look at this thing before I lay down $60.

They basically said that it was very bare bones with no story elements and very little to do.[/QUOTE]


Did they say anything about the multiplayer? I'm still keeping it, I loved the demo but damn thats harsh. Do you have the new OXM?
 
[quote name='LinkinPrime']Did they say anything about the multiplayer? I'm still keeping it, I loved the demo but damn thats harsh. Do you have the new OXM?[/QUOTE]

Yes, I got the new OXM today. This is the only thing they say about multiplayer:

[quote name='OXM']At least if you play it online you can talk a little trash, but even the cookie-cutter multiplayer game doesn't go out of its way to redeem gameplay.[/quote]
 
[quote name='shipwreck']Yes, I got the new OXM today. This is the only thing they say about multiplayer:[/QUOTE]

Damn I get my magazines late. I bearly got the 2 disc mag with FFXI 1 1/2 weeks ago and you already got the new one. Damn. I just saw a pic on teamxbox forums. Does the demo have anything other than the Quake 4 mulitplayer?

http://forum.teamxbox.com/showthread.php?t=415824
 
that is too bad, I have been looking forward to this game since last E3, I might have to rent it before I make my final decision.
 
I would have bet the farm on a 7.0 - 7.5... but, wow; I didn't see that one coming. OXM is pretty forgiving, too.

I'm not bothering with Full Auto.
 
THe demos on the disc are Quake 4 and Condemned for the 360 and Black and Total Overdose for the Xbox. If I have time I'll write up the usually monthly outline.
 
Told ya. Sometimes you can just tell a game is going to end up being remembered as very "meh" in a few years. Poor Sega.
 
[quote name='Monsta Mack']Not suprised by that crappy demo.[/QUOTE]


I agree...I was completely underwhelmed by that demo. I guess Fight Night is going to be my next new 360 purchase.
 
Damn Sega keeps dropping the ball. I -like Brak- was fully expecting a 7-7.5, but the OXM review sounds pretty harsh. I wasn't going to pick this up right away anyway, but I'll still wait and see what everyone else has to say. I thought the demo was passable, and figured I'd pick up Full Auto for around $20-30 based on my impressions.
 
I played the demo at my neighbor's. I was not too impressed. I kept wishing it would be more like Carmageddon 1 or 2. At least throw in some Peds! The rewind thing was kinda cool but seems out of place.
 
Shit, this is one of the reasons I bought the 360 for. The main reason being for Oblivion, but damn, 5.5 is harsh. Looks like I'll be passing on Full Auto now. Here's hoping that Oblivion will make me feel good about buying a 360.
 
Damn, harsh. I hope this doesnt push sega away from the 360 when people arn't buying this up :whistle2:/

But then again, I doubt it.
 
havent played the demo but it seemed avg at ZH. But I assume if the multiplayer sucks and the game does not change much above the demo that I'd rather play NFSMW.

saves me 60 dollars so I don't mind. Seems like FFXI is keeping me busy until the beta runs out anyway lol. Just in time for 99 nights :D... at least jp release =(
 
I thought the mp might be fun, if quickly forgettable... Oh well, saves me $60. I've got my sights firmly set on GRAW as my next title now.
 
SIs this game REALLY supposed to have a story...I mean, it's like Burnout with guns and BURNOUT has ZERO plot. No race games have much of a plot.....sounds like a half-assed review.
 
OXM seems to have gotten more "hardcore." They are now getting nit picky like a lot of other mags and are rating semi good games a lot lower. The trend seemed to start last issue. This issue with 5.5 for Full Auto and 8.5 for DOA 4.
 
to be honest fuck reviews. i've loved so many games that have gottenbad reviews. i dont trust them at all anymore. ill rent it or something, since i dotn have the cash to buy it. i loved the demo.
 
I'm stunned. Skip this one and donate the cash to charity, narcotics, or something constructive like that. :)

This demo looked like a stinker, I mean people can enjoy what they want to, but for the sake of your wallets don't let the lack of 360 games make you wanna buy bad ones.
 
It'll probably end up like Quake 4. All the media bitched about it, but the gamers generally gave it a semi thumbs up.

If this is the direction OXM is headed with Ms. Reyes at the helm...count me out.
 
I was extremely disappointed in the Full Auto demo, so I expected something like this. It drives just like Crazy Taxi, what were they thinking?
 
Wow that sounds terrible, 5.5? Yikes! I'll stick with PGR and NFS until Burnout comes out. Is that score worse than NBA Live or Fifa? Is full auto the king for having the lowerst score on the system? I think its fifa but Full Auto almost pulled it off.
 
Ouch. I may not even rent it now, with Burnout 360 coming out so soon. 5.5 from OXM is harsh, OXM usually bumps UP the score. Wow. I was looking forward to this.

And for those drooling for the Black demo, don't. I played it and was severely underwhelmed. It's slow, looks like crap after playing 360 games, and I kept shooting a wall and it wouldn't fuck up - that's lame, even Red Faction had that.
 
[quote name='Scorch']
And for those drooling for the Black demo, don't. I played it and was severely underwhelmed. It's slow, looks like crap after playing 360 games, and I kept shooting a wall and it wouldn't fuck up - that's lame, even Red Faction had that.[/QUOTE]

well i liked it...
 
I found the info about Full Auto in the newest OXM to be fairly humorous and contradictive. Check out the Full Auto ad on page 12 of the very same issue of OXM. There is a quote on the fold-out page supposedly from an earlier OXM (and several other publications) telling how great the game is [going to be].
 
It felt like they didn't know whether to make this a combat game or a racing game... the way they implemented both, together, is disastrous.
 
for fucks sake, just rent it and form your own opinion.....is it that hard? If we all liked games based on scores we would all enjoy exactly the same games....but that's not true.
 
[quote name='RedvsBlue']We should have known it was too good to be true when they started bribing preorders with a free faceplate.[/QUOTE]

True. The same can be said about The Outfit, which alot of people have said it would be crap as well.

With so little games coming out for the 360 this year (more will be announced by E3, but in general there won't be a ton of games out this year) people are resorting to buying crappy games. I guess It's understandable for Feb. We had 0 new games in January (although DOA4 which pretty much it, even though it released at the end of December) and we have a whopping 3 (possibly 2, NCAA March Madness has not been confirmed for Feb, just anywhere from now till the NCAA Tournament begins) games coming out in Feb.

Guys save your money and wait for Burnout Revenge, or some other racing game in the near future.
 
Im going to get both Full Auto and Burnout Revenge. Ive been anticipating Full Auto for quite some time and one review wont change my preorder
 
[quote name='RedvsBlue']We should have known it was too good to be true when they started bribing preorders with a free faceplate.[/QUOTE]

So every game that includes a faceplate is crap? COD2 was recently just bundled with a faceplate..
 
Personally i can care less about reviews especially form OXM. If you actually read the review and dont look at the score you see how much of a joke the magazine is. There writing is garbage. If you think you might like the game rent it and give it a try dont base anything on this review or any others. Its one persons opinion.
 
wow, people sure are willing to change there entire OPINION based on what some half-assed mag says in a few barely formed paragraphs. I liked the demo, and unlike half the people in this thread, I STILL like the demo, 5.5 be damned. Honestly, you guys should at least wait until more sites and mags release scores before you blindly march to the beat of the review drum.
 
[quote name='-Never4ever-']wow, people sure are willing to change there entire OPINION based on what some half-assed mag says in a few barely formed paragraphs. I liked the demo, and unlike half the people in this thread, I STILL like the demo, 5.5 be damned. Honestly, you guys should at least wait until more sites and mags release scores before you blindly march to the beat of the review drum.[/QUOTE]
Exactly my point
 
I was hoping there would be some type of plot in the game, kind of like the ones in the Twisted Metal series. But that's my only disappointment from the review. I thought the demo was fun, so I'm still looking forward to it regardless of one person's score.
 
Here is the full OXM review that was typed up by markbart on GameFaqs.com:

Courtesy: Official Xbox Magazine
March 06

Once you scrape a little of the shiny next-gen paint off Sega's new car-combat game Full Auto, you get a clear glimpse of the no-frills, standard factory model vehicle that lies underneath. For all of Full Auto's slick chrome exterior, which looked so promising earlier in the game's development, it's clear that the time invested under its hood wasn't spent on really fleshing out the game beyond its initial concept. The thrill of blowing up enemies while tearing around a track only lasts as long as it takes to learn Full Auto's core mechanics: Unwreck, turbo, shoot, and steer. In other words, the thrill is gone pretty quickly.

Describing the game as "Burnout with guns" is misleading. Burnout is innovative and addictive, and it evolves the arcade driving experience with features like Crash Mode and Revenge during races. Full Auto, unfortunately, never moves past its basic drive-fast-shoot-everything concept. It's more like Need For Speed II with guns, really. The 17 various game types found within Career Mode don't break up the one-note gameply much, either. They just define what kind of track you race on -- point-to-point or circuit with minor variations -- or who you're racing against.

Maybe if the weapons were more creative, or if you could choose any of them to mount on any hard point on your car, the gameplay would be more varied and satisfying. Instead, you choose from a limited number of weapon loadouts, resulting in every race in every mode feeling incredibly similar, combat-wise. Go as fast as you can or blow up as many opponents as possible -- it really doesn't matter because there are no power-ups and no particularly clever game type, and Full Auto doesn't force you to employ much strategy other than keeping the gas and trigger fully depressed. At least if you play it online you can talk a little trash, but even the cookie-cutter multiplayer mode doesn't go out of its way to redeem the gameplay.

The addition of the Unwreck feature (one button press lets you rewind time a la Prince of Persia, giving you a do-over on badly navigated turns or another chance to avoid clumsily rolling over a mine) makes a good attempt at differentiating the game from the racing pack. But in the face of the crushing dullness of everything else in the game, it has little chance to shine. Neither does the way the game lets you blast everything in the environment to smithereens -- and what's not beautiful about that? -- but sadly, there's little consequence or payoff for doing so other than spectacular eye candy and the boost to your nitro and Unwreck meters. Despite creating easy-to-avoid obstacles, it doesn't add much. Where's the depth?

Another incredibly strange thing about Full Auto is that there doesn't appear to be any story. We're not stupid. We know this is an arcade racer with guns, not War and Peace, but we'd like an explanation as to why our little street racing club has resorted to such extreme violence. The lack of backstory isn't a huge ding against Full Auto, but in a game that works entirely on a visceral, cosmetic level, it's just another void left gaping.

If you can find a video store that'll let you rent this game for exactly one hour, do it. That's about how long it'll take you to realize that Full Auto is pretty disappointing for an Xbox 360 game and for car combat games in general. Cars with guns should equal good times, but Full Auto's skin-deep thrills last only as long as it takes for a quick test drive.

-- Tom Price


THE VERDICT
+ They nailed the cool Unwreck feature.
- Limited weapon options.
- No story or plot, not even a thin one.
? What happened to good old-fashioned post-apocalyptic wastelands as a background story?

5.5
 
Translation: It gets pretty old if you play it for extended periods of time, Career mode is pretty no frills, there's a lack of variety and there's no story (something that seems to have really ticked off the reviewer, even though he's trying to hide it).

OKay, now it's a tad bit easier to get a grasp on the game, instead of: "OMFG TAT GAME GOT A 5.5!!!! I USED TO LIKE IT, BUT NOT NOW THAT I SAW TAT SCORE!!!! SEGA DROPPED TEH BALL AND M$ IS TEH SUXXORZ!!!!"

Now wait until at least two or more reviews (that aren't fan reviews BTW, because nine-times-out-of-ten, they suck), ignore the score and actually READ them. Then base your decision.
 
bread's done
Back
Top