Homeland Security official arrested in child sex sting

sblymnlcrymnl

CAGiversary!
Feedback
95 (99%)
Didn't see this posted yet:

Sheriff: Suspect chatted online with detective posing as teen girl

Wednesday, April 5, 2006; Posted: 10:16 a.m. EDT (14:16 GMT)


WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A Department of Homeland Security official was arrested Tuesday night on charges of using his computer to seduce a child after he allegedly struck up sexually explicit conversations with a detective posing as a 14-year-old girl, authorities said.

Brian J. Doyle, 55, is charged with seven counts of use of a computer to seduce a child and 16 counts of transmission of harmful material to a minor, according to the Polk County, Florida, Sheriff's Office.

Doyle, a deputy press secretary, will be placed on administrative leave, although it's unclear if it he will be paid, a department official said.

In interviews with police, Doyle confessed and has agreed to waive extradition to Florida from Maryland, Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd said. (Sheriff says the suspect was looking to groom a 14-year-old for sex -- 3:18)

On March 12, Doyle contacted a Polk County computer crimes detective who was posing online as a 14-year-old girl and "initiated a sexually explicit conversation with her. ... Doyle knew that the 'girl' was 14 years old, and he told her who he was and that he worked for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security," according to a statement from the sheriff's office.

Judd said that Doyle, in the first conversation, told the detective his job with the department and "started immediately into pretty vulgar language. He explained in graphic detail the sexual acts he wanted to perform with this 14-year-old."

As the two continued chatting online, police said, Doyle gave the detective his home and office phone numbers as well as the number to his government-issued cell phone. He also had explicit telephone conversations with the detective posing as the girl, authorities said.

In addition, he sent "hard-core pornographic movie clips" over the Internet and also used America Online's instant-messaging service to have explicit online conversations, according to authorities.

"The investigation revealed that the phone numbers given to the detective were in fact Doyle's and that the AOL account was registered to him," the sheriff's office said.

Doyle also sent photos of himself that were not sexually explicit but said he would send nude photos if the "girl" would buy a Web camera and send him nude photos, according to authorities. In one photo, Doyle's Department of Homeland Security tag is visible, Judd said.

"Many of the conversations he initiated ... are too extraordinary and graphic for public release," a statement from the sheriff's office said.

"I read the transcripts," Judd said. "I wanted to see if this was just as outrageous as the detectives depicted it. ... It shocked all of us who have worked vice, narcotics, organized crime, homicides."

A Department of Homeland Security spokesman said the agency would cooperate in the probe.

"We take these allegations very seriously," Russ Knocke said.

Doyle is divorced and has children, Judd said. Authorities believe he could have held similar conversations online with others, the sheriff said, because at some points during online chats he would address the detective by the wrong name.

Doyle never attempted to arrange a visit but did mention knowing someone in the region, Judd added.

Before Doyle's arrest Tuesday night at his Silver Spring, Maryland, home, the "girl" had told him of her access to a Web camera and that her mother would be away so "he was eager to rush home from work."

Detectives from agencies, including the U.S. Secret Service and Montgomery County, Maryland, Police Department, knocked on his door as he was online and served the arrest warrant, Judd said. They also immediately executed a search warrant for his home.

"We found his communication still on his computer with our undercover detective," he said. "Had we not been posing as a 14-year-old, Brian Doyle would have been grooming someone, some young lady, for a sexual encounter."

CNN's Jeanne Meserve contributed to this report.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/04/04/homeland.arrest/index.html
 
Oh shit, sorry you got busted :p.

It's odd how many old guys want to have sex with underage boys/girls, I don't get it.
 
I wonder if this is the same guy that was caught in a joint police/NBC News special sting? I remember watching something like Dateline when they bust these guys and I'm pretty sure one of them was a Dept of Homeland security officer or something and that was at least a month or so ago.
 
[quote name='SpazX']Oh shit, sorry you got busted :p.

It's odd how many old guys want to have sex with underage boys/girls, I don't get it.[/QUOTE]
I was going to say the same thing, I literally have no interest in it. How does one develop a liking of something as depraved as underage child sex?
 
[quote name='docvinh']I was going to say the same thing, I literally have no interest in it. How does one develop a liking of something as depraved as underage child sex?[/quote]

In a sexually repressive society such as modern America, unusual fetishes will develop.

However the fetishes today pale in comparison to those of the Victorian era or in Japan. Heck, some Arab countries have ankle porn - how crazy/idiotic/sad is that?
 
A lot of pedophiles have no adult sexual interest, or revert to interest in children due to situational factors (such as stress). This case isn't technically pedophilia, but it works the same way. A few are more "bisexual" though, liking kids and adults. Being attracted to girls of this age doesn't have to do with repression. While it would be difficult to label it like this for use in scientific research, it could be considered similar to a sexual orientation in common language.

Many fetishes do depend on what's forbidden or unseen, or is supposed to be viewed sexually, this can be seen if you look at all the foot (sole, toes, top of feet etc.) porn and various other fetishes in our culture. You also wouldn't see much focus on the breasts in cultures where women always walk around topless. I doubt there's ankle porn, but it wouldn't exactly suprise me in some countries.

Having an illegal fetish is unfortunate, both for the individual and the elevated risk of engaging in illegal activity. Luckily though, most realize such behavior is immoral and don't actually act on it, particularly in such a sad/amusing manner as this homeland security guy. What idiot gives a 14 year old girl his office number when he works for the u.s. government? Or sends his picture saying "I'm a homeland security official". Maybe he figured it would help him get what he wanted, but the girl could have easily blackmailed him since it would be so easy to track.
 
God damn it, you just can't get a decent conversation going with a teenager over the internet anymore without having to worry about it being a cop. What is this world coming to?
 
I like the hot cop on cop action.

THe phone number thing is great, "Hello, Department of Homeland Security, Hotdad680's office."

I wonder if the feds are targeting gov't employee? They got that NASA guy a week or so ago.
 
[quote name='docvinh']I was going to say the same thing, I literally have no interest in it. How does one develop a liking of something as depraved as underage child sex?[/quote]

They don't struggle as much like full grown women.
 
[quote name='SpazX']It's odd how many old guys want to have sex with underage boys/girls, I don't get it.[/QUOTE]

If you knew what many government employees (not contractors) actually look and act like then you would understand. Many of these people are not only deviod of any social skills whatsoever but they are fugly to boot. Falling off the ugly tree is an understatement.
 
[quote name='Snake2715']The part that confuses me is the cop posing as a 14 year old girl on the phone? How the hell is that possible?[/quote]

Voice changers. If Tom Cruise can do it, anyone can.
 
[quote name='SpazX']Oh shit, sorry you got busted :p.

It's odd how many old guys want to have sex with underage boys/girls, I don't get it.[/QUOTE]

The publicity and reoccurrance of these kinds of cases is also complete and total proof that there is no such thing as a "deterrent effect" to our criminal justice system. When you have "net vigilante" groups (like pervertedjustice.com) scouring and sorting out as many people as they can, yet it still occurs, one can no longer make the claim that punishing some sexual predators deters others.

Of course, sexual predators *are* remarkably different monsters than drug users or thieves/property criminals, so I can't completely claim that there is no deterrent effect (not from this, anyway ;)).
 
[quote name='alonzomourning23']Many fetishes do depend on what's forbidden or unseen, or is supposed to be viewed sexually, this can be seen if you look at all the foot (sole, toes, top of feet etc.) porn and various other fetishes in our culture. You also wouldn't see much focus on the breasts in cultures where women always walk around topless. I doubt there's ankle porn, but it wouldn't exactly suprise me in some countries.[/quote]

You make alot of great points, but I have to disagree about the part on womans' breasts. Take a look at any of the fertility fetish dolls of prehistoric civilization where bras would not have been worn - they invariably portray women with huge breasts or multiple breasts (sometimes as many as 300).
 
[quote name='camoor']You make alot of great points, but I have to disagree about the part on womans' breasts. Take a look at any of the fertility fetish dolls of prehistoric civilization where bras would not have been worn - they invariably portray women with huge breasts or multiple breasts (sometimes as many as 300).[/quote]

Well I'd think breasts are a little different, wanting breasts seems kind of inherent (obviously for nourishment from birth, but something more than that or some extension of that). Of course fertility would be linked to breasts, so it may just be that, men are attracted to boobs because they're a outward physical representation of the fertility of the mate. 300 titties though...then they're just rolls...that's not cool.
 
[quote name='camoor']You make alot of great points, but I have to disagree about the part on womans' breasts. Take a look at any of the fertility fetish dolls of prehistoric civilization where bras would not have been worn - they invariably portray women with huge breasts or multiple breasts (sometimes as many as 300).[/quote]

But don't forget breasts have two functions. One is sexual, and the other is nursing. Breasts are essential to womanhood and the mother. Breasts are a part of the women and therefore subject to sexual interest, but they are not fetishized in cultures where being topless is the norm. In fact men in cultures were bare breasts are normal are often suprised when told of how western men are so in love with them. Here's an interesting piece I found:

Carolyn Latteier, the author of Breasts, The Women's Perspective on an American Obsession, said in a TV program "All about breasts, "In many cultures, breasts aren't sexual at all. I interviewed a young anthropologist working with women in Mali, in a country in Africa where women go around with bare breasts. They're always feeding their babies. And when she told them that in our culture men are fascinated with breasts there was an instant of shock. The women burst out laughing. They laughed so hard, they fell on the floor. They said, "You mean, men act like babies?"


http://www.consumerhealthdigest.com/breastfeeding.htm
 
bread's done
Back
Top