We talk a lot about the law concerning illegal immigrants, but I want to make this more philosophical. You basically have two choices here, the objectivist standpoint, or the absolutist standpoint. Please remember this is not about the law so much, but ethics basically.
The objectivist would look at the situation, is the person here to make a better life for their self or family, or is the person here to smuggle drugs into the country or something similar.
The absolutist does not care about the situation; the law is the law, being here illegally is wrong no matter what the situation.
I think I've made my opinion clear before, I side with the objectivists.
Btw, you can also take the relativist position and say there is no objective right or wrong, you dirty fence sitters.
The objectivist would look at the situation, is the person here to make a better life for their self or family, or is the person here to smuggle drugs into the country or something similar.
The absolutist does not care about the situation; the law is the law, being here illegally is wrong no matter what the situation.
I think I've made my opinion clear before, I side with the objectivists.
Btw, you can also take the relativist position and say there is no objective right or wrong, you dirty fence sitters.
Last edited by a moderator: