Is this the definition of pandering?

elprincipe

CAGiversary!
Feedback
60 (100%)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091015/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_social_security_obama

If not, it's pretty close.

Let's see. Younger Americans not only foot the bill for Social Security and Medicare and all the huge increases in those voted in by politicians of the older generation, but they are much more likely to be unemployed (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/youth.nr0.htm), have lower salaries and less savings. So the answer propagated by Obama and the idiots on Capitol Hill? $250 payments to seniors. fucking hell.
 
[quote name='JolietJake']I can only hope that one day future generations get to take care of my old ass.[/QUOTE]

You must have missed the memo about Logan's Run healthcare. ;)
 
[quote name='JolietJake']I can only hope that one day future generations get to take care of my old ass.[/QUOTE]

Hope springs eternal. Medicare is already going into the red and Social Security will soon follow. We then have a wonderful choice between (1) 80-90 percent tax rates which will destroy the economy; or (2) radically cutting these mismanaged government bastard children and thereby basically robbing us of what we have have been forced to contribute during our working years toward retirement (in programs with a flat rate of return when adjusted for inflation like Social Security) instead of being able to manage our own money to much greater advantage. Thanks, you fucking selfish child-robbing fucks.
 
i love the irony of this statement...

"The likelihood of losing an average annual COLA increase of about $200 to $300 in 2010 may sound like no big deal to some, but for millions of seniors who've already seen a third of their Social Security eaten up by health care costs" said Barbara B. Kennelly, a former Democratic member of Congress from Connecticut.

Just think about it for a minute.
 
[quote name='perdition(troy']There was only a 2% difference between the amount of young people voting in 08 and 04.[/QUOTE]

That's still significant considering most of them voted for him. The large margin he won by assured that the GOP would not insist on a recount.
 
[quote name='Dead of Knight']That's still significant considering most of them voted for him. The large margin he won by assured that the GOP would not insist on a recount.[/QUOTE]

Dur that was ACORN voter fraud chicago style politics socialist fascist obamao muslim terrorist
 
[quote name='fatherofcaitlyn']Are we agreeing there has been no inflation this year?[/QUOTE]

CPI is negative, unless you want to argue that isn't a good measure. Social Security recipients got a huge increase last year due to high gas and grocery prices, so they're coming out ahead already. It's quite simply a transparent attempt to buy the votes of old people with their own money.

Oh yes, and both parties are (of course) in favor of buying these votes. After all, the money would be received close to elections next year, and every incumbent needs a little $250 gift to the group that votes the most. Many of them are rightly afraid for their jobs. Of course, the Republicans want the money to come out of "stimulus" funds instead of just stealing it from the next generation...which is like wanting to take it out of stolen funds anyway.
 
bread's done
Back
Top