Update, 10-17-05:
Today, three amazing things happened in the battle on gamers vs. Jack Doughboy Thompson.
1. A team has created his exact simulator he asked for by modding San Andreas to his specifications. The link is here but it seems to be flooded at the moment. I'm sure mirrors will appear soon. The team - GTA players Fighting Hellfish - titled it Defamation of Character: A Jack Thompson Murder Simulator.
2. Thompson replied by saying that 1) we don't understand his satire, 2) our actions clearly show our willingness to further corrupt humanity, and 3) the game wasn't to his specifications at all.
3. Because of this, he has refused to donate the supposed $10K he said he would to a charity to help restrict gaming violence/exposure to small children. This is where it gets really good. Penny-Arcade.com has officially bitchslapped the hell out of him. I will quote since that is the only way to do it justice:
Pure ownage.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm sure most have heard of his new proposal, in which he will donate $10,000 to a charity if someone indulges his Saturn-sized ego of creating a highly violent videogame.
In short, it centers around a father whose son was killed by a gamer. Supposedly the gamer was way into some violent game (he doesn't directly name GTA but it's easy to draw that conclusion) where he killed people with bats, and then slaughtered the father's son. After he is convicted and sent to life in the jail, the father goes nuts thinking that justice was not served. So he goes INSANE and decides it's vigilante justice time, bitch. So he picks up all manner of weapons - guns, bats, etc - and proceeds to walk around slaughtering the developers of the game, the lawyers who defended the games actions (think freedom of speech for the gaming development community, Jack phrased it oddly), etc etc etc, a long unending list of nonsense, rhetoric, and non-sequiter rambling ensues.
So I was thinking, let's give him his cake and watch him have to shove it up his ass.
I propose a text adventure game. How honestly hard could it be to put it together.
>YOU SEE PEOPLES. KILLS DEMS? Y OR N
Y
>YOU KILL PEOPLES. N, S, E, W?
N
>YOU ENTER A PLACE WITH MORE PEOPLES. KILL DEMS? Y OR N
And so on. We could even have a score system. Did you kill people? 100 points. Did you not kill people? No points, you lose, AND the game calls you a pussy.
I'm not bored or ....um...unbusy enough to make such a thing. But how great would it be to see gamers finally show this idiot up?
(Note: I do think this is a good idea but I don't necessarily care if it happens or not. I'm mostly just talking because I'm still on lunch break.)
He's a link to the story in question: http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/violent-games/jack-thompson-offers-10k-charity-for-proposal-130254.php
EDIT: Damn semantics.
Today, three amazing things happened in the battle on gamers vs. Jack Doughboy Thompson.
1. A team has created his exact simulator he asked for by modding San Andreas to his specifications. The link is here but it seems to be flooded at the moment. I'm sure mirrors will appear soon. The team - GTA players Fighting Hellfish - titled it Defamation of Character: A Jack Thompson Murder Simulator.
2. Thompson replied by saying that 1) we don't understand his satire, 2) our actions clearly show our willingness to further corrupt humanity, and 3) the game wasn't to his specifications at all.
3. Because of this, he has refused to donate the supposed $10K he said he would to a charity to help restrict gaming violence/exposure to small children. This is where it gets really good. Penny-Arcade.com has officially bitchslapped the hell out of him. I will quote since that is the only way to do it justice:
You know what, Jack? We're going to be the men you're not. You said that your insulting, illusory ten thousand dollars would go to the charity of Paul Eibler's choice. We've got a good guess that he'd direct your nonexistant largesse toward The Entertainment Software Association Foundation, a body that has raised over six point seven million dollars over the last eight years. We've just made the donation you never would, and never meant to. Ten thousand dollars' worth. And we made it in your name.
Pure ownage.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm sure most have heard of his new proposal, in which he will donate $10,000 to a charity if someone indulges his Saturn-sized ego of creating a highly violent videogame.
In short, it centers around a father whose son was killed by a gamer. Supposedly the gamer was way into some violent game (he doesn't directly name GTA but it's easy to draw that conclusion) where he killed people with bats, and then slaughtered the father's son. After he is convicted and sent to life in the jail, the father goes nuts thinking that justice was not served. So he goes INSANE and decides it's vigilante justice time, bitch. So he picks up all manner of weapons - guns, bats, etc - and proceeds to walk around slaughtering the developers of the game, the lawyers who defended the games actions (think freedom of speech for the gaming development community, Jack phrased it oddly), etc etc etc, a long unending list of nonsense, rhetoric, and non-sequiter rambling ensues.
So I was thinking, let's give him his cake and watch him have to shove it up his ass.
I propose a text adventure game. How honestly hard could it be to put it together.
>YOU SEE PEOPLES. KILLS DEMS? Y OR N
Y
>YOU KILL PEOPLES. N, S, E, W?
N
>YOU ENTER A PLACE WITH MORE PEOPLES. KILL DEMS? Y OR N
And so on. We could even have a score system. Did you kill people? 100 points. Did you not kill people? No points, you lose, AND the game calls you a pussy.
I'm not bored or ....um...unbusy enough to make such a thing. But how great would it be to see gamers finally show this idiot up?
(Note: I do think this is a good idea but I don't necessarily care if it happens or not. I'm mostly just talking because I'm still on lunch break.)
He's a link to the story in question: http://www.kotaku.com/gaming/violent-games/jack-thompson-offers-10k-charity-for-proposal-130254.php
EDIT: Damn semantics.