FriskyTanuki
CAGiversary!
- Feedback
- 36 (100%)
[quote name='dyeknom']Once again, you fail with sarcasm of that original post. I guess we can continue since you apparently don't understand the concept behind saying "a" title character/franchise game as a blanket statement... and just expecting people to selectively excluding the failed explorations into other genres.
Here's some hands on impression of Epic Yarn. http://www.fragland.net/previews/E3-Hands-on-Kirbys-Epic-Yarn/204/
http://wii.ign.com/articles/109/1098702p1.html
Liking the idea of having a Blue Kirby "buddy" join to assist in the game. May be interesting if we can string together some fights (making people miss jumps by ripping yarn) ala Chip n Dale Rescue Rangers
[/QUOTE]
I full got what you were talking about, that "a game starring X" can technically be labeled as "an X game." But if it's a spinoff that isn't in the same style as what X is known for, then it's reasonably not what one means when they say they are glad to finally have "an X game." If I'm a fan of the Denver Broncos and am anticipating seeing their first game of the new season, I would not be referring to pre-season games since they're not real games.
Technically, yes... Mario Sports Mix is a MARIO game as he's the title character and seems to almost solely comprised of characters in the Mario world... I would point to both... as they are BOTH part of the mario franchise (though at this point, it's more of an empire). And before you ask, Halo Wars is a HALO game, Pac Man world is a Pac-Man game, Final fantasy X-2/Crystal Chronicles/Chocobo Dungeon/Dirge of Cerebrus are Final Fantasy games, Castlevania judgment is a castlevania game, and even DK jungle beat is a Donkey Kong game. They are ALL part of the same title franchise. Just because it's not the genre you like or THINK should make a "title character/franchise" game... doesnt negate the fact that it's still a game FEATURING that character/franchise as the title character/franchise. Hell, the first post even mentions its his first PLATFORMING game since the n64... not his first "game" since the n64. That's not saying they are good and not just a cash-in on an already successful franchise (because most of the time it is). Shall we continue to be a big bag of d^$%s or can we get back to posting useful information?
Here's some hands on impression of Epic Yarn. http://www.fragland.net/previews/E3-Hands-on-Kirbys-Epic-Yarn/204/
http://wii.ign.com/articles/109/1098702p1.html
Liking the idea of having a Blue Kirby "buddy" join to assist in the game. May be interesting if we can string together some fights (making people miss jumps by ripping yarn) ala Chip n Dale Rescue Rangers
I full got what you were talking about, that "a game starring X" can technically be labeled as "an X game." But if it's a spinoff that isn't in the same style as what X is known for, then it's reasonably not what one means when they say they are glad to finally have "an X game." If I'm a fan of the Denver Broncos and am anticipating seeing their first game of the new season, I would not be referring to pre-season games since they're not real games.