[quote name='Sarang01']I was referring to Hispanics in general Strell. Original Spaniard's, before they went to the New World, were WHITE period unless you want to infer all of them mixed with the Moor's when they were there. When they went over there they mixed and became Biracial. Native Americans ARE transplanted Asian's, get it RIGHT. They traveled over the land bridge many, many years ago.
edit: Strell I like you but if the translation I put up is even close to accurate I would disagree. In fact I'd argue you have your head in the sand if that's the case. Any group named "The Race" of any origin smacks of Hitler and his whole Aryan schtick. I mean seriously, you're just

ing asking for it or TELLING people you're like them with a name like that.[/QUOTE]
Hoo boy.
Spaniards are - more or less -
still white. In fact if you were placed in a room with a bunch of different people from various countries from Europe, you probably would have a difficult time telling each one apart from another based solely on appearances. This is not necessarily something you can be faulted for, since most Americans couldn't do it (much like how we couldn't do this for
any group of people from various countries, such as the Middle East or Asian cultures).
So this "original Spaniards" claim is really weak.
As for Native Americans....I can attack this a few different ways.
1) It wasn't called Asia back then, so by technical history, you're wrong. Granted this is semantics, but still - you're labeling something based on current information as opposed to what was the deal at that time in history.
2) As others have pointed out, there's a huge disparity in heritage, culture, genetic makeup, and thousands of other factors between present descendants of Native Americans versus Asians.
3) If they really traveled over the land bridge, then they most likely would have been either A) extremely early man, which would be an entirely different classification (no nationality or ethnicity really discernable outside of early man), and this is based on the generally-agreed upon theory that they were following prey (mammoth) instead of making any real conscious decision of "Hey man, I feel like
movin' a few thousand miles away, you up for it?) and/or B) potentially those of Russian descent, which may or may not have included some Mongolian blood, but even that isn't all that likely given the first theory being considered the forerunner.
Now then, as to La Raza.
Please drop the Hitler analogy. There is a reason I told you to do it earlier.
NOTHING AND NOONE IS COMPARABLE TO HITLER AND THE NAZIS.
The only reason people do it so much is because it is
so recognizable by most people. But it is because of this familiarity that I can assume that someone MUST be aware of the degree of atrocity commited by that group, and the problem with me knowing that is simply that no other group in modern history measures up. At some point there might be in the future, but for the time being, NOTHING is comparable.
Further, La Raza originates from circa 1925. A quick look at Hitler's history shows that he didn't really start pulling strings until a few years after that at
best, and didn't even really ascend to his notoriety until even longer.
It's a group based around the principle of earning respect and recognition for citizens of (primarily) Central America and their cultural heritage. Yeah, factions of it are militaristic (think Black Panthers) and there have even been some bad apples in the basket, but it is nowhere
near even approaching anything remotely comparable to Hitler at the Nazis. So while you've got a few people touting that they need to kill whitey, it's no different than any other nutcake you'd find in any non-white group (and hell, even some white groups).
Additionally there's no all supreme commander rising up under the guise of blaming certain specific groups for their ills against the backdrop of nationalistic imperialism,
nor is there a huge group of people buying into the bullshit of those nutcakes,
nor is there any real current war-like diplomacy taking place with these groups.
It's.
Not.
Nationalistic.
It's cultural, and yearning for recognition, as well as celebrating that history.
People need to stop comparing any ill they can target to Hitler. It's a poorly-framed and tired argument and it NEVER makes any sense.