[quote name='greendj27']As I said earlier, I've never seen the photo. Was it fully nude or was it just showing a little bit of skin with the nether regions covered up. I'm asking because those would be two very different scenarios.[/QUOTE]
It wasn't pornographic, however, it's still abusive and harassing... and per the TOS:
Proper contributions to CheapAssGamer.com are welcomed by registered users. You agree not use the Site in any way to:
a. post, email, transmit or otherwise make available Content that you know to be false or that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, tortious, defamatory, obscene, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;
I could see this falling under the catagories of:
1. abusive
2. invasive of another privacy.
Based on Jimmie's own words during the argument and after he was unbanned, intent was obvious and clear.