Last edited by a moderator:
i agree, start ditching the tablet, and have a price drop maybe to $249.99 msrp, and $199.99 starting black friday/ special holiday sale.Meh. I think at this point they have to get the Wii U down to $199, invest more in marketing, and hope Kart/Smash/DKC/Bayo/ZeldaWarriors are hits. I don't know if they redesign the Wii U to cut costs and somehow keep the Game Pad (obviously Game Pad would have to become cheaper to make) to get down to $199 or if they just stop shipping Game Pads and give out Pro Controllers with the system to get it to $199.
They'd rather take the PR hit of dropping the Game Pad or making it optional because if they keep trying to sell the Wii U at $299 or so no one will buy it post-holidays. They'll be losing money on something that can't get enough software sales to break even. Heck, Nintendo can't even be breaking even on most of their first party software that isn't selling 1 million +. So you either bite the bullet, take $100 off your console by axing the Game Pad, sell it for $199 at a small profit and start making money even with bad sales potentially or keep it at a high price, lose money and also lose that $8 billion cash pile they've piled up with the Wii/DS.
Personally I say drop the Game Pad if it has to be done. $199 Wii U around DKC or MK8 with a brand new Player's Choice of $20 titles like Zombi U, Lego City, Pikmin, etc could get some americans on board.
I think the lesson they've learned from this is that their next home console has to ditch BC and ditch PowerPC. Use off the shelf PC parts that are slightly modified, court third parties crazy instead of waiting for them to come to you.
My thoughts exactly. A 3DS player will add a little life to the Wii U. There is really no reason NOT to do this. If they stay in the home console race, next time they need to stop trying to be so gimmicky. Have a normal console that has ONE controller to use on all of the games. And make up with the third party developers.i say a redesign would be great. how this for an idea? add a game card slot to the gamepad so you can play your 3ds/ds games on your tv. the fuction of the touch pad would be used like the bottom screen of the 3ds/DS
call the new peripheral the Wiids.
"Buried in reams of financial data is the revelation that Nintendo have 812.8 billion Yen (£6.7/$10.5 billion) in the bank - enough for it to take a 20 billion Yen loss (£163/$257 million) every year until 2052. Then there's almost 469 billion Yen (£3.8/$6.0 billion) held in premises, equipment and investments. When that runs out - we're in the year 2075 by this point - they've got some of the most valuable intellectual property in gaming to sell off before the company goes out of business."
http://www.gamesradar.com/nintendo-doomed-not-likely-just-take-look-how-much-money-its-got-bank/ (Jun/23/2012)
Motion controls are the worst idea since virtual boy. I'm glad Sony dumped six axis after realizing just how stupid it is.Pretty sad to see Nintendo having such failure with the Wii U when it's the first time in years they've been putting out steady, solid content and innovating in a way that is actually beneficial to the industry.
Motion controls are stupid for hardcore gamers like us but you would be hard pressed to find more intuitive controls for casual/non gamers. When you have friends over at the house good luck getting folks to use a dual stick controller. Yet everyone can easily pick up a Wii mote and play Mario Kart, Mario or any other first party Nintendo game.Motion controls are the worst idea since virtual boy. I'm glad Sony dumped six axis after realizing just how stupid it is.
Nintendo hasn't had good ideas in a long time, sorry. If they had, I'd still be buying their home consoles.
My fear would be Nintendo keeps making handhelds quits making consoles and you can only get Mario and Zelda games on the handhelds.It would be a shame if Nintendo would go down the same way as Sega! although playing mario kart on a ps4 would be cool![]()
Yes! but I do not know if their handhelds are going to be the next best thing in the future, it seems as if they are a bit lost.My fear would be Nintendo keeps making handhelds quits making consoles and you can only get Mario and Zelda games on the handhelds.
A year ago I would of disagreed with this statement, supporting the inclusion of the gamepad to ensure it's full support (as any peripheral that isn't bundled in some way is typically doomed to failure) and hopefully bring some more innovation to its IPs.Sadly they should have created the Wii HD for $199 and not bothered with the tablet. Then they could phase out the Wii once they dropped the Wii HD to $149.
Having money is not the same as being a stable business. Nintendo has always had a treasure chest of money. Even during the dismal GC days, they had ~$6 billion in cash and they've never had any major debt to this day (AFAIK).You guys do realize that nintendo has more money than Sony right? There doing just fine.
http://o.canada.com/technology/gaming/nintendo-could-prevent-a-financial-game-over-with-these-3-strategies/Having money is not the same as being a stable business. Nintendo has always had a treasure chest of money. Even during the dismal GC days, they had ~$6 billion in cash and they've never had any major debt to this day (AFAIK).
I'm not saying they're gonna go anywhere anytime soon but no matter how much money they have, they still need stable stream of revenues to continue into the long run. Nobody knows Nintendo better than Nintendo, and even they're not happy with their situation. That should speak volumes.
You're literally just repeating what I said but ignored my point completely.http://o.canada.com/technology/gaming/nintendo-could-prevent-a-financial-game-over-with-these-3-strategies/
Nintendo has over $5 billion in cash reserves and no debt. They're projecting a loss of $240 million from 2013 which means they could post the same amount of losses every year for the next 20 years before they've depleted their cash reserves. Plenty of money doesn't even begin to describe Nintendo's situation...