"O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here's How It Happened" coming to TV/Bookstores near you!

Admiral Ackbar

Admiral Ackbar

CAGiversary!
Feedback
25 (100%)
From the Washington Post.

"'O.J. Simpson: If I Did It, Here's How It Happened' will be broadcast over two nights, Monday, Nov. 27, and Wednesday, Nov. 29. Fox airs "House" on Tuesdays and nobody messes with House. Not even O.J.

"'If I Did It' is also the title of the former pro football player's new book that, Fox said yesterday, hits bookstores Nov. 30 -- just in time for the holiday gift-buying season, ho, ho, ho. And who wouldn't love to find a copy of O.J.'s sordid sort-of hypothetical confession in his Christmas stocking on the morning of the day in which we celebrate the birth of baby Jesus?

"And, in one of those incredible coincidences that make covering the TV industry so fulfilling, the book is being published under the Regan imprint, headed by Judith Regan, who will conduct the interview with O.J. on Fox. And her publishing outfit, ReganBooks, is a division of HarperCollins, which is owned by News Corp. -- which also owns Fox!"

Only Fox!

So who's gonna Tivo this?!?
 
How ironic is it that this is releasing on the birthday of my abusive ex?

This guy OBVIOUSLY did it. It's really getting to be a joke now.... hell, it was a joke over a decade ago.
 
schmuck :
1. a contemptible or foolish person
2. O.J. Simpson

If anyone still thinks he didn't do it...
 
He is a true saint of a person, and a hero to all mankind. We should all feel blessed to live on the same planet as he does.
 
[quote name='Scahom1']With the double jeopardy law...can't he admit to doing it and no one can touch him?[/QUOTE]

As I understand it (I am not a lawyer), he could indeed flat-out confess and not be re-tried for the same crime. I believe this even applies to lesser charges for the same crime (i.e. manslaughter instead of murder). However, keeping it hypothetical prevents him from being tried on associated charges that might arise from a confession (perjury, etc.).
 
Wow. Just...wow. The guy sure has big brass ones.

This is one of the few times double jeopardy doesn't make sense to me.
 
I cant seem to get what you guys think but I think its fucking awesome, I will definitely be reading this book and shit. How cool is that, Its like laughing in everyones face and saying I killed that bitch. How about an OJ game. It could be stealthy like splinter cell but then you get caught and pull a need for speed getaway, they you phoenix wright your way out of that shit. I dont know what after that. Maybe some GTA hot coffee, to help you relax...
 
[quote name='DeathDealer']I cant seem to get what you guys think but I think its fucking awesome, I will definitely be reading this book and shit. How cool is that, Its like laughing in everyones face and saying I killed that bitch. How about an OJ game. It could be stealthy like splinter cell but then you get caught and pull a need for speed getaway, they you phoenix wright your way out of that shit. I dont know what after that. Maybe some GTA hot coffee, to help you relax...[/QUOTE]

go swallow a knife
 
As a criminal defense lawyer, yes, double jeopardy would prevent him from being retried for any offenses related to the two killings for which he was acquitted. I'm sure the SOL on perjury for anything to do with his civil case has run.

I was actually in law school during the trial so we were all paying alot of attention to it. I have no doubt he did it, and I also have no doubt that the prosecution royally screwed-up that case. The second biggest injustice in that whole case was that Darden and Marcia Clark actually got better jobs after demonstrating total incomptence in front of the nation. Only in America!
 
I think if Phoenix Wright defended OJ, it would be like the final case of the second game

"I can't defend this guy, he's OBVIOUSLY guilty!"
 
[quote name='WeaponX2099']Sorry, but fuck OJ. This is way too far.[/quote]

No need to apologize. The guy's a prick.
 
The sad part isn't that he killed. But that he killed and laughingly got away with it. Now he is even mocking the fact he got away with it laughingly. The saddest part is that he's going to make millions from the book sales, on the above facts.

[quote name='DeathDealer']I cant seem to get what you guys think but I think its fucking awesome, I will definitely be reading this book and shit. How cool is that, Its like laughing in everyones face and saying I killed that bitch. How about an OJ game. It could be stealthy like splinter cell but then you get caught and pull a need for speed getaway, they you phoenix wright your way out of that shit. I dont know what after that. Maybe some GTA hot coffee, to help you relax...[/QUOTE]

Thanks for contributing so much to our society.. :roll:
I think the swallow a knife comment was appropriate for you.
 
Here is a easy way to get the truth out of him.

One maybe he did not do it and somebody did it for him and they set it up to make it look as if he did do it with the minor details misplaced.

Again there was two dead people that night not just one. Why not just one?
Was his wife having an afair or did the person went to investigate and sawed too much.

Lastly we need to use truth serum which they should have used from the begining.
 
[quote name='greatscot']As a criminal defense lawyer, yes, double jeopardy would prevent him from being retried for any offenses related to the two killings for which he was acquitted. I'm sure the SOL on perjury for anything to do with his civil case has run.

I was actually in law school during the trial so we were all paying alot of attention to it. I have no doubt he did it, and I also have no doubt that the prosecution royally screwed-up that case. The second biggest injustice in that whole case was that Darden and Marcia Clark actually got better jobs after demonstrating total incomptence in front of the nation. Only in America![/quote]

You are right, anyone with any common sense knows he did it, but the prosecution really messed up, even some or the CSI guys where not wearing gloves when collecting the evidence ! Some of the jurors said the defense proved resonable doubt, but the fact is he did it.

I have a question, why is there a SOL for perjury, kidnapping etc.. but not for the irs to come after a person ? I never understood that !
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
bread's done
Back
Top