[quote name='spmahn']I'm also getting tired of the racist argument, it's every bit the red herring the birther argument is.[/QUOTE]
We have a president who a large portion of American citizens believe is (1) not an American citizen, (2) not a Christian despite his claims, but in fact a closet Muslim, and (3) less than American because he doesn't capitulate to the interests of the extremely wealthy in terms of policy (note that he pretty much actually does, but I'm talking perception, not policy).
The crux of these arguments are to delegitimize the President as someone who is either 'less than' American, or simply not American. To think that these issues are borne of his policy and not his race is to ignore simmering racial tension that remains in and pervades modern American society. No other President, not the conservative Republicans who were elected, nor the Democrats who were FAR more left than the corporate-pleasing failure-to-triangulate centrist-to-conservative Democrat President we currently have. No other President. It's one thing to disagree with his policies, as many do (including myself). It's another issue entirely to deny his status as an American citizen. That's rooted in racism.
Similarly rooted in racism are the after-birther (heh) claims that Obama was a poor to mediocre college undergrad, who did not qualify for his postgraduate education and positions by virtue of his intelligence or hard work. They are demanding his undergraduate transcripts now. The implication is quite clear - Obama is a lazy negro who only got to where he was because of apologetic liberal policies like Affirmative Action. He did not achieve what he did in American society in *spite* of lingering racial animosity and white privilege, their argument logically mandates. He achieved what he did because of policies that embrace weak performances of minority citizens.
Irrespective of Obama's educational performance at any level, Republicans chiding a president for being intellectually mediocre really exposes the absurdity of modern politics. The lesson we learn is that we must think in terms of black and white - there is nothing positive or redeemable about the persons we disagree with. We must despise and question them to the very core of their being, as it is a necessary prerequisite to achieve our political demands. The very same people who thought the world of George W Bush's weak to mediocre academic achievements are now (without knowledge) chiding Obama for the same thing. Obama was correct when he posited that if one day he said the sky was blue, Republicans would launch an investigatory committee to verify that fact, and come back with a series of challenges and questions.
This is without a doubt racism at its core. To deny that is to have a view of racism that refuses to ever think that racism can be done covertly, and that racism must be intentionally thought, rather than taken for granted and taught/ingrained in our views of the world. It is deeply, deeply rooted in racism to challenge Obama's citizenship and achievement.