[quote name='specialk']Now that they lost they suck. Yeah, up until yesterday all the Auburn fan's thought this was going to be a pushover...some admitted it...some didn't but I would be everyone thought..."Yeah it's Vandy, they got lucky a few times but we're about to crush them" and now they lost everyone's saying "Auburn Sucks"...blah blah...believe you me I heard it all yesterday (Sat by 2 Auburn fans). But eh whatever.
And yeah, AU might not have played a great game yesterday (aside from the 2 td's in 1 minute) but I think Vandy's D had something to do with that

[/QUOTE]
Don't get me wrong, I thought Auburn would win, but I believed it would be by a similar score, just the other way. If anyone told you we would win by two touchdowns, then they were delusional (mostly because we're incapable of scoring!)
Any honest Auburn fan knows we aren't good. I mean, watch the first four games. We've averaged 8 points offensively against SEC, or something like that. And I think the problem was Auburn going away from what got them those two touchdowns, not so much Vandy's D. Vandy's D did play well, but Auburn has more talen at every position (except QB. I'm sick of our shitty QB play. This is also the second time that a backup has scorched us. That's terrible.)
I wasn't trying to take away from Vandy's win. Wait, maybe I was. All I'm saying is that Auburn is not a very good team and was overrated at 13.