I just don't see that happening. Unlike West Virginia, Louisville actually has a defense. i think they are win out. The other problem is that I really think (and hope

) Arkansas is going to lose against Tennesee and LSU. Arkansas was able to out muscle Auburn, but they won't be able to do that against either of those guys.
That puts Auburn in the title game, assuming they can get passed a real tough UGA and Alabama. in Tuscaloosa If that's the case, the question is does an undefeated from the Big East go, or a one loss team who wins the SEC. I think we all know that the SEC team should go, but unfortunately the computers will probably take Louisville. I would not be surprised if we see and OSU/Lousivlle matchup.
Now, what will really throw everything up in the air is if OSU loses. I think a Michigan loss is way different than a OSU loss. It will be interesting to see.
Also, whoever says name recognition doesn't mean anything is full of shit. Auburn started off the 2004 season at about 17. Michigan was about 14 or 15. Somehow Michigan jumps over EVERYONE and is #2. Auburn was still way on the outside at this point during that year. This can be repeated ad nauseum with a bunch of teams: Notre Dame, Alabama, USC, OSU, Michigan, Miami, etc. It sucks that you can't move up on performance only, but have to rely on the past as well.
[quote name='CocheseUGA']I think we might be getting set up for a situation where the loser of the OSU/UM game could possibly play the winner for the title.
Why do I say this? Check it out:
The winner of the WVU/Louisville game gets beat by Rutgers. Florida plays Arkansas for the SEC title and loses. Doesn't matter who loses the OSU/UM game.
I think Rutgers has a good shot at beating BOTH WVU and Louisville, and there's a very good chance Arkansas can win the west. That would bring this possibility very much in play.[/QUOTE]