I wonder if we can separate out new CAGs out of the responses above to see what that looks like. Looking strictly at, say, those people who have registered since 2/22/08 and see what their response breakdown looks like.
I'm really suspicious when I see option #3 jump so significantly in one day, and to have options 1 and 2 decline by almost 6% (10% of their total for the prior two days).
It's common knowledge that companies have a presence in online forms - it's new marketing, man. Moreover, anyone who represents MS has a vested interest in option 3 over option 4. Option 3 shows the reliability of a console (it's lasted a long time!), while option 4 presents more of a "it's just a matter of time, man" response.
So I'm suspicious, admittedly, when I see such a large increase in one option (#3) combined with new posters (like C00Ljet above) who point out that the only consoles they have had die on them were 2 of 3 of both Sony's consoles, and the knowledge that companies such as MS have a history of using "new marketing strategies" through discreet online personae.
Not that I disbelieve that someone would have 2 of 3 PSX/PS2 die; that's probable. But I think it's strange to see someone register for this site for the sole purpose of pointing that out in a thread about 360 deaths.
That said, if there is a way of singling out people who have registered for the CAG forums in the past 7 days, and what their responses to the survey were. I'm *very* curious about that.
EDIT: That said,
NES: 0 of 3
SNES: 0 of 1
GB: 0 of 1
GBC: 0 of 1
GBA: 0 of 2
DS: 0 of 2
PSX: 1 of 2
PS2: 0 of 1
PSP: 0 of 1
Xbox: 1 of 2
360: 2 of 3
Wii: 1 of 2
PS3: 0 of 1
Wonderswan: 0 of 1
Virtual Boy: 0 of 1
MSX: 0 of 1
TG16: 0 of 1
Genesis: 1 of 2
Saturn: 0 of 1
N64: 0 of 2
GC: 0 of 1
Commodore 64: beats the hell out of me, but I have one.
