I'll apologize for saying that since you didn't mention it at that very moment. You have, however, dismissed their coverage of gender/privilege before and so my frustration was a carryover from that exchange. You outright called it 'stupid' and I've held it (perhaps unfairly) against you. I'm not sure where you were coming from then but in my mind it raised a flag.
Which only means you didn't comprehend whatever post you're taking out of context. Yes, gender issues exist. Yes, gender equality should be a goal. Yes, gender discussion is important. And once again you manage to insult the person you're talking to by implying I'm somehow sexist and dismissive of gender issues, just because they don't agree with you.
The fact that you take some old, misremembered post and decide i'm a 'dude' is exactly what I'm talking about.
That said, the current focus on gender in gaming takes it to a ridiculous degree.
Because you know what?
a) sex
Sex is okay. Big boobs are okay. Dudes with ridiculous abs and python muscles are okay. Coming down on a game because it has big boobs doesn't advance any cause, it simply creates controversy for the sake of controversy. Because even in a perfectly 'balanced' world, there should be a place for erotic (for lack of a better term) art. And it also ignores that 99% of males are presented as ridiculous adonis level perfection as well.
b) art
People should be able to draw whatever the

they want.
c) economic
The largest market for 'hardcore' games is male. By a crazy long shot. Obviously people will develop for that market. Expecting otherwise approaches naive.
d) perspective
The vast majority of developers are male. It's no surprise, then, that the dominant story telling perspective is male. Even if forced to create heroines, they'd still be telling stories through a 'women's perspective as viewed by a male perspective'.
So... not remembering exactly what my previous post was about, or what the context was of it, I feel safe in guessing it was probably something like:
Writing article after article accusing games, gamers, or developers of 'sexism' has gotten old, fast, because it's an overly simplistic way of viewing the issue. Yes, gamers should stop using words like 'rape' or attacking female gamers or devs. But if you actually want to see more heroines, then the only true answer is... wait.
Wait? How can that be the answer? It's the answer because the games that exist reflect the market. And now that more and more females are getting into gaming (casual being the 'gateway' drug), more and more games will be created by them and for them.
You can see the same thing in every industry, from film to books, to porn. As the market expands, more content is created that meets that market. Porn is a perfect example, since it's so raw. You can find everything from extreme to extreme, men dominant, women dominant, humiliation, whatever, directed and created by both genders. You don't write an article when some porn video is too 'sexist' for you, you watch something else, or perhaps even make your own.
So just because I think many of the articles on sexism in gaming are misguided, simplistic, antagonizing click-bait articles does not mean I don't have opinions on the subject or am against gender equality. I just don't think the path to gender equality is creative castration or shaming gamers or developers. I think it's having women enter the industry and making games. That will happen naturally as more and more women get into gaming.
But expecting every release in a currently male dominated hobby to appeal to everyone is kind of backwards.
My wife is a female gamer, in that she likes about 3 games. Match 3 puppy/kitten games. Lego games. Pixeljunk Monster. She hates competitive games. She hates hard games. She hates redoing anything. She is a completely, totally, different market from me. And she doesn't buy games, I do. So, dropping from the 'male/female' level to the
'me/her' level, I'm not surprised more games are aimed at me than her.
Sorry for the 'dude' answer, I wasn't really paying attention when I wrote this because I was too busy watching hockey and drinking a brewski while wearing my wifebeater.
And yes, Polygon is corrupt. A site that tries to rely on journalistic integrity should never have taken half a million from a primary player in their industry. Even if they never write a biased thing, the acceptance of that cash undermined their credibility, same as if a vegetable review site took money from Monsanto. It has nothing to do with 'gender' articles -- I actually thought that was kotoku or something, not Polygon. I don't read Polygon, so don't really know what they're up to.