Question about june 5 Family guy. friend said she is going to call up fox & complain

[quote name='GuilewasNK']Thanks for changing it Kayden. The thing was that the topic was about someone complaining about Family Guy so seeing cowballs (huge ones at that) was unexpected. Had I seen a topic with "Cowball" or "NSFW" in it, I would know to avoided the topic. About the work thing, it is a real SLOW business day where I am but my co-workers are still mulling around. I have done all the paperwork today that I can do but I still have to be here until 5:15pm and this is the only other thing I have to do.

It's moot now though.[/QUOTE]

It was more directed at evilmax because he replied with a rabid monkey in his ass.

You're a mature level headed person, I know you make good calls. :cool: :lol:
 
Hey thats why I love the 1st admentment .. But lets not forget South Park were Stan said "They didnt care about the the violent stuff is only when sex was involed did they care" not the exact quote but you get the idea..

"You know Ameriaca was founded by a bunch of prudes" Cooper
 
comedywaynebrady1ju.jpg


Is Wayne Brady gonna hafta choke a bitch?

Seriously, OP's friend need to smoke some weed and chill out. Maybe she's cranky because the batteries of the vibrator in her ass ran out.
 
[quote name='Mr.Answer']I believe the joke was he was excited to meet all the stars but that they were all dea. He listed off all the ones that are dead but then ended with Horatio Sanz (whatever his name is)(who isn't dead.[/QUOTE]

That was a funny part. I have no problems with the Jimmy Fallon/Meg part and thought it was quite funny how Jimmy turned it into the SNL intro. Meg is only 16? I don't think most people who watch the show knows that and therefore don't have any problems with it.

The prison scene was a bit crude and shocking to see, but Fox did have that warning before the show.
 
Seems strange that folks would have a hard time about the SNL intro and not about a baby who tries constantly tries to do works of evil, a talking alcholic DOG, and well one could go on and on....it is a show that is far off the wall.
 
[quote name='SkyGheNe']Skin color was an important facet in her novels. Have you read The Left Hand of Darkness or the Earth Sea series? IMO, if you're going to do a movie/series based off a book - it should be accurate. She has a lot of information and meaning in her books. I'd respect the woman's wishes.[/QUOTE]

I've read them both and skin color is only of trivial detail to the entire story, look at the left hand of darnkess the main character being black is more of a surface detail to distinguish him from the rest of the characters earlier on for the reader, to help make him appear as more of an outsider. It seems like the TV minseries has a lot more wrong with it than simply making everyone white. I don't suppose you noticed any lack of acting ability?;)

When making a movie things get cut and changed, some things aren't partical and somethings don't sit as well with the audience at hand. She knew this before she signed off the movie rights and went for the cash instead, clearly her wishes don't mean shit.
 
[quote name='Kayden']What a salty cunt... I say stab her in the uterus so she cant replicate.[/QUOTE]


Hahaha thats harsh...
 
beat the shit out of your friend. she is the type of person who complains about everything that is not Biblical I assume. and my first sentence makes sense cause I never even thought about that I never go oh wow meg slept with that guy and he is 30 and she is 16 how could they do that. those horrible people. tell your friend to lighten the hell up or she will never have fun in life. you know what never mind let her grow up and become a bitter old prune do yourself a favor and drop the friendship.
 
[quote name='Mr.Answer']I believe the joke was he was excited to meet all the stars but that they were all dea. He listed off all the ones that are dead but then ended with Horatio Sanz (whatever his name is)(who isn't dead.[/QUOTE]

I suspect whoever wrote that was trying to create a pattern that would soon result in Sanz's demise for the betterment of all mankind.
 
[quote name='epobirs']I suspect whoever wrote that was trying to create a pattern that would soon result in Sanz's demise for the betterment of all mankind.[/QUOTE]

c'mon... he has to get a pass for the Kirsten Dunst episode where he hung upside down in the skin tight spiderman suit - that was funny!
 
[quote name='epobirs']They got one part perfect. Just like her books, it was dull throughout.[/QUOTE]

Whatever you say, her books kick the balls out of Hairy Pothead.
 
If your friend doesn't like what's shown on television, tell her to change the channel to something she prefers, or to find another way of spending her time that does not offend her.

It's a very simple concept.
 
Well i hate the O channel, but you don't see me bitching about how it's brainwashing all our women and should be taken off the air. So, stop bitching and just don't watch it.
 
[quote name='Trakan']There's a warning before the show even starts. Tell her to get over it.[/QUOTE]

Amazing that the little detail above was forgotten by the person who's going to complain to Fox? Don't like it, don't watch it. And don't ruin it for the rest of us who do like it.
 
[quote name='eldad9']This is off topic, but...
you liked the earthsea mini-series? the author of the books didn't. not one bit.

A Whitewashed Earthsea
How the Sci Fi Channel wrecked my books.
By Ursula K. Le Guin
http://slate.msn.com/Default.aspx?id=2111107[/QUOTE]

I realize this goes further off topic and I'll shut up after this rant and let it get back on track, but IMO she places way to much importance on her character's skin color. I know she's angry they changed her characters, but I and I'm sure most science fiction and fantasy readers don't give a rat's ass what the main characters skin color is. Granted I wasn't able to read the books thirty years ago and I can't say I've read her books or watched the miniseries at all. In the end though I don't really enjoy stuff written by hypocrites, and I don't pay much things made by people who seems to put the race issue above their storytelling... Some quotes from her website talking about how to write good, plausible fantasy:

"While I am composing I have no abstract ideas, purposes, or policies in mind, but am intent only on following the story."

"I believe that as soon as a conscious political or didactic purpose intrude on that credence, they deform it and the story loses plausibility."

"An ideological purpose produces a sermon, or satire which is not fantasy, and has very different standards of plausibility, since it is a mirror held up to actual life."

Seems like she often breaks her own rules...
 
[quote name='shrike4242']Amazing that the little detail above was forgotten by the person who's going to complain to Fox? Don't like it, don't watch it. And don't ruin it for the rest of us who do like it.[/QUOTE]

Exactly, as per the topic now, I'd say let her complain to Fox, see what good it does. Like others mentioned they've lasted through the same storm a few times. And there was that disclaimer so I can't see complaining to the FCC doing that much better anyhow seeing as how what was depicted was part of the disclaimer.
 
[quote name='dtcarson']

Consumer doesn't like a product. Consumer wishes to inform *the creator of that product* of her dislike, and share her opinion. [/QUOTE]

If people don't like something they should just not buy/support it. Complaining about it and ruining it for those who do like it is communistic.
There are plenty of shows that I don't like, but you don't see me trying to get them off the air. I just don't watch them. This way, my fellow Americans who enjoy watching bad shows can still watch them.

[quote name='dtcarson'] But what she is doing is very valid and acceptable. If you like the show that much, then write in *yourself* and say "We love it, keep making it."[/QUOTE]

Come on, nobody has the time to waste writing letters to companies telling them how much they like their show. If the ratings are up people are watching it. There's no need to write a letter to let them know you're watching it and enjoying it. The only ones who are going to write are the complainers, because they have nothing better to do with their pathetic lives. If everyone who ever watched the show wrote a letter to Fox there would probably be 1 complaint letter to every 10,000 support letters. More companies nowadays need to stop listening to these crackpots who write just to complain.

[quote name='dtcarson'] Me, personally, I am in that no-revenue camp. Watched FG once, thought it was one of the most dreadfully unfunny things I've sat through, even apart from being offensive in places just for the sake of being offensive. I turned it off, haven't watched it since. But I also don't feel strongly enough about it to bother writing to Fox, and I do think it is quite cool that Fox reacted to the very good dvd sales by bringing it back. Wish they'd do the same for Futurama.[/QUOTE]

I applaud you for this. If you don't like it don't watch it, but don't ruin it for those who enjoy it.
 
She has every right to complain.

Just do it legitimately, and don't go on one of these "Parents Concerned about TV" email spamalot crusades that are designed to befuddle Federal FCC workers (not difficult) and fraudulently inflate the numbers of complaints. One hysterical teenager aspiring to be a 1920s style temperence feminist will not rock the boat.
 
[quote name='camoor']She has every right to complain.

Just do it legitimately, and don't go on one of these "Parents Concerned about TV" email spamalot crusades that are designed to befuddle Federal FCC workers (not difficult) and fraudulently inflate the numbers of complaints. One hysterical teenager aspiring to be a 1920s style temperence feminist will not rock the boat.[/QUOTE]

of course she has the right to complain - everyone does. I think the debate here is whether the "salty cunt" should complain and, if so, does she need to be "stabbed in the uterus"...
 
this topic is funny... let her complain all she wants, nobody will care anyways. then eventually she will realize that remotes have a power button and also channel buttons used to take such blasphemy off the screen,
 
I'm only through two pages, so I don't know if it's been said. Statutory rape laws vary from state to state. I know, at the very least, that in Michigan, it's 16 years old, not 18.
 
People need to grow a sense of fuckING humor, if you didn't find it funny that sucks for you other wise please promptly change the channel and shut the hell up, what about when brain barked at the black guy is that supposed to make blacks and minorities un-happy, did he laugh at that part if he did he must be a racist? Who in there right mind with two brain cells, would say hey, that fictional 2d cartoon on TV made it so that having sex with an under aged girl is cool so I'm going to do it! :roll:

Please print this out and show it to them..
 
[quote name='AHEADAMUS']I'm only through two pages, so I don't know if it's been said. Statutory rape laws vary from state to state. I know, at the very least, that in Michigan, it's 16 years old, not 18.[/QUOTE]

dont tell people that or you have tons of people flocking to michigan : )
 
[quote name='Dr Mario Kart']so you didnt realize your friend was so uptight? right?

you need to introduce that bitch to the back of your hand.[/QUOTE]

:rofl:
 
"Complaining" about a show is NOT "communistic", now you're just tossing in buzzwords. DENYING someone, a private party, the right to complain to another private party, simply because you don't agree with it, is "communistic" in the Stalinist, you-say-what-we-tell-you-to vein.
Have any of you people who are threatening to smack her, or stab her in the womb, or kill her [such tolerant and open people you are!] *ever* complained to Best Buy for not pricematching, or CC for not giving you a sale, or any other company for anything service related? Not things like price tag says 4, got charged 5, but other things? If so, then, well, you should just shut up, get smacked, and quit shopping there, since if this lady has no right to inform FOx of her opinion, neither do you.
I appreciate CAG for the deals, but honestly, 99% of the members here are spoiled, violent, intolerant hypocrites who feel they're entitled to everything, their opinions are the only ones that count, and have no morals or ethics if not having them means saving another 50 cents on a game or shipping a game. It's really sad.

Don't worry, my opinion differs from yours [i actually support individual rights and opinions, rather than conforming to the 'tolerant' and politically correct anything-goes sheep mentality], and I know that's not allowed, so I'll leave this thread alone now. My piece has been said, I'll reiterate briefly for any actually interested in facts or logic instead of violent threats and sheeplike groupthink mentality.

* The OP's friend has every right, as a CONSUMER, to inform a COMPANY of her OPINION on a PRODUCT. In this case, AFAIK, she is *not* asking the government, so First Amendment and "censorship" is not an issue, and to most sane people [ie, non-CAGs], the random vitriol and hatefilled rants about someone you don't even know, expressing her opinion, would be more frightening and scary than a consumer recognizing her power as part of the voice of the marketplace.

Carry on with name calling and threats and random pseudopolitical buzzwords.
 
[quote name='dtcarson']"Complaining" about a show is NOT "communistic", now you're just tossing in buzzwords. DENYING someone, a private party, the right to complain to another private party, simply because you don't agree with it, is "communistic" in the Stalinist, you-say-what-we-tell-you-to vein.
Have any of you people who are threatening to smack her, or stab her in the womb, or kill her [such tolerant and open people you are!] *ever* complained to Best Buy for not pricematching, or CC for not giving you a sale, or any other company for anything service related? Not things like price tag says 4, got charged 5, but other things? If so, then, well, you should just shut up, get smacked, and quit shopping there, since if this lady has no right to inform FOx of her opinion, neither do you.
I appreciate CAG for the deals, but honestly, 99% of the members here are spoiled, violent, intolerant hypocrites who feel they're entitled to everything, their opinions are the only ones that count, and have no morals or ethics if not having them means saving another 50 cents on a game or shipping a game. It's really sad.

Don't worry, my opinion differs from yours [i actually support individual rights and opinions, rather than conforming to the 'tolerant' and politically correct anything-goes sheep mentality], and I know that's not allowed, so I'll leave this thread alone now. My piece has been said, I'll reiterate briefly for any actually interested in facts or logic instead of violent threats and sheeplike groupthink mentality.

* The OP's friend has every right, as a CONSUMER, to inform a COMPANY of her OPINION on a PRODUCT. In this case, AFAIK, she is *not* asking the government, so First Amendment and "censorship" is not an issue, and to most sane people [ie, non-CAGs], the random vitriol and hatefilled rants about someone you don't even know, expressing her opinion, would be more frightening and scary than a consumer recognizing her power as part of the voice of the marketplace.

Carry on with name calling and threats and random pseudopolitical buzzwords.[/QUOTE]

and then you realized that this is the internet and just because someone says "stab that ho in the uterus, right in the babymaker!!!" doesnt mean they are being serious. lighten up a little bit cheech...
 
[quote name='dtcarson']"Complaining" about a show is NOT "communistic", now you're just tossing in buzzwords. DENYING someone, a private party, the right to complain to another private party, simply because you don't agree with it, is "communistic" in the Stalinist, you-say-what-we-tell-you-to vein.
Have any of you people who are threatening to smack her, or stab her in the womb, or kill her [such tolerant and open people you are!] *ever* complained to Best Buy for not pricematching, or CC for not giving you a sale, or any other company for anything service related? Not things like price tag says 4, got charged 5, but other things? If so, then, well, you should just shut up, get smacked, and quit shopping there, since if this lady has no right to inform FOx of her opinion, neither do you.
I appreciate CAG for the deals, but honestly, 99% of the members here are spoiled, violent, intolerant hypocrites who feel they're entitled to everything, their opinions are the only ones that count, and have no morals or ethics if not having them means saving another 50 cents on a game or shipping a game. It's really sad.

Don't worry, my opinion differs from yours [i actually support individual rights and opinions, rather than conforming to the 'tolerant' and politically correct anything-goes sheep mentality], and I know that's not allowed, so I'll leave this thread alone now. My piece has been said, I'll reiterate briefly for any actually interested in facts or logic instead of violent threats and sheeplike groupthink mentality.

* The OP's friend has every right, as a CONSUMER, to inform a COMPANY of her OPINION on a PRODUCT. In this case, AFAIK, she is *not* asking the government, so First Amendment and "censorship" is not an issue, and to most sane people [ie, non-CAGs], the random vitriol and hatefilled rants about someone you don't even know, expressing her opinion, would be more frightening and scary than a consumer recognizing her power as part of the voice of the marketplace.

Carry on with name calling and threats and random pseudopolitical buzzwords.[/QUOTE]

First of all, she would hardly qualify as a consumer. The product in question isn't a product. A product is something that is paid for. You pay for the tv set. You pay for cable tv. Fox is a general network that isn't directly paid for - in the same way that CBS, NBC, and ABC are. That's what the advertisers are for. Advertisers are the money resource that fuel the networks via commercials and product placement in shows. As a result, the shows themselves are not subject to direct input from people who would otherwise be called 'consumers'. These people don't become consumers until they purchase an actual 'product' that is related to the topic in question - in this case, Family Guy. Seeing as this was a new episode, a DVD wouldn't exist yet so hencefore, it's not a product (yet).

Secondly, why do you feel the need to defend this woman? You seem to only notice the posts that are talking about 'stabbing her in the uterus' and other such things and ignoring those posts who made a worthwhile suggestion such as 'turn the channel'. If you look at a lot of the posts, most of them are not concerned about whether or not she should express her opinion. Some of them outright say so. Rather, the majority is more concerned with that notion that her opinion is invalid (and I believe rightly so).

Thirdly, off color remarks made in jest on an anonymous board on the internet is hardly grounds for the level of anger you seem to display. Taking a joke about stabbing someone in the ovaries seriously is about as stupid as someone complaining about a cartoon tv show where one of the characters has sex with a main character who happens to be underage while ignoring the more obvious heinous jokes of racism (Brian barking at the black producer) or using a handicapped person as a bludgeon (Peter using Joe to break the music instruments) or anything else that NORMALLY happens on this type of show. At any rate, it makes no sense that this woman would watch Family Guy in the first place and be appalled for one thing considering there's about a billion other things more worthwhile to be pissed off about - both on the show and in real life. Me doth thinks she protests too much. :roll:
 
[quote name='dtcarson']I appreciate CAG for the deals, but honestly, 99% of the members here are spoiled, violent, intolerant hypocrites who feel they're entitled to everything, their opinions are the only ones that count, and have no morals or ethics if not having them means saving another 50 cents on a game or shipping a game.[/QUOTE]

Yeah! fuck you, well over 30,000 people!
 
[quote name='epobirs']About 17 years ago there was a Fox show struggling to find its audience. A woman named Terry Rakolta was outraged by this show and started a massive campaign to get it taken off the air. Since most people had never heard of the show they felt compelled to tune in and see what all of the fuss was about. They discovered they really liked the showed and it was soon doing great in the ratings. It went on to become one of the longest running sitcoms ever and now 'Married With Children' does great business in syndication and on DVD, assuring its cast and producers of an excellent ongoing income from a show in an obscure timeslot that was on the verge of cancellation.

Fox couldn't have done a better job if they invented the anti-'Married With Children' campaign for themselves.

http://www.bundyology.com/rakolta.html

It's kind of funny that Christina Applegate would be a perfect choice to portray Terry Rakolta in a movie.

If your friend becomes the new Terry Rakolta it would be the best thing to ever happen to Seth McFarlane. She really needs to calm down. A joke about a teenage girl getting seduced as part of a meteoric showbiz career is hardly treading any new ground. Has she seen the episode that implied that Lois' father was also father to a litter of puppies?

Has she seen 'That 70's Show' with endless underage sex and constant pot smoking? It's the only show I've ever seen that come close to my memories of that era, ehen pot was nearly legal and virginity nearly illegal past puberty.[/QUOTE]

also it is not like Kelly was not sleeping with older men who would have probably fit in the the stat. rape senario as well. Some of those biker dudes were pretty old, and that was over 10 years ago.

and one of the best episodes was on earlier today. The one where Al works as a bartender in a bar where he is a piece of meat (manpower I think is its name). The fact that they used "Tuff Enough" by the Fabulous Thunderbirds all that season was just awesome. I can't wait until the post Steve episodes start coming out on DVD
 
[quote name='chakan']A free country is wasted on people like her . Maybe she'd prefer to the old Afghanistan, where the government would enforce morals on TV for her.[/QUOTE]

Ya, send your friend over to Saudi Arabia, where she can learn what discipline is all about
 
While your friend is entitled to her opinion, she must watch Family Guy quite often to know that Meg is 16. (They've only touched on that a couple of times, IIRC.)

A little off-topic, but I have been kinda disappointed with this seasons FG episodes. I hope they pick it up a bit. On the other hand, American Dad has been getting quite good.
 
[quote name='dtcarson']...* The OP's friend has every right, as a CONSUMER, to inform a COMPANY of her OPINION on a PRODUCT...[/QUOTE]
That is her right. Just as it is the right of the OP to kick her whiny fucking ass outta his apartment.

I have no problem with people expressing thier opinion. Just be diplomatic about it instead of being a dipsh1t.
 
[quote name='Rig']While your friend is entitled to her opinion, she must watch Family Guy quite often to know that Meg is 16. (They've only touched on that a couple of times, IIRC.)

A little off-topic, but I have been kinda disappointed with this seasons FG episodes. I hope they pick it up a bit. On the other hand, American Dad has been getting quite good.[/QUOTE]

That is the best point made in the whole topic. She must have also missed the episode where Peter was jealous of Chris' endowment.
 
Wow what the hell has happened to the old CAG I know and love? The place where “mature gamers” hung out to BS and have semi-intelligent discussions. This thread is full of preteen angst and verbal abuse. dt is about the only one in this thread that is using any sort of reasoning.

If someone believes in something they have every right to write a letter to the network with their complaints. Just because she is being a prude she should not be or told “introduce that bitch to the back of your hand, move to Afghanistan, Pee in her butt, shove coals up her ass, stab her in the uterus, go die somewhere, beat the shit out of your friend, What a hore” (LOL hore).

It is not funny to make internet threats even if it is just a tasteless unfunny joke. I like the FG just as much as the next guy but I like my fellow Americans rights to free speech more. If she thinks it was inappropriate then fine she should write a letter. She is just being up tight IMHO but if she feels convicted to do something about more power to her.

This thread is shameless. I would like to make a plead to CAG to stop and think about how you are bringing CAG to the same level as the rest of the gaming community. Lets keep CAG a “mature” community that does not need “stab her in the uterus” jokes.
 
I agree the violent comments aren't that funny. Taking a hostile view towards her is just as bad as her hostile view towards a cartoon. One person's free speech cannot take away another persons. By that I mean she can talk about her distaste all she want but the creators of Family Guy (whether people like it or not) have a right as well to air their shows. While it is her right to protest, it is illogical IMO to write a letter over something like this. This is not something on her front lawn that she cannot remove. Is isn't mandated that she view the show.

Like I said before, that is the strentgh and weakness of Family Guy. It relies heavily on shock humor and sometimes it gets them in trouble.
 
[quote name='spoo']This thread is shameless. I would like to make a plead to CAG to stop and think about how you are bringing CAG to the same level as the rest of the gaming community. Lets keep CAG a “mature” community that does not need “stab her in the uterus” jokes.[/QUOTE]

:cry: Will somebody think of the children. :cry:

Seriously though, shame on you guys for cracking jokes about this girl who obviously knows what should and shouldn't be on TV. Bow your heads in shame and accept the judgement of America's morality censor crusaders, and the corporate-friendly, christian-friendly FCC.

ONLY dtcarson shows any reason, after all. ;)

I just hope they can remove all those swears from "Saving Private Ryan" next year, and replace them with alot of "Jiminy Christmases" and "Fudgesicles"
 
[quote name='GuilewasNK']Like I said before, that is the strentgh and weakness of Family Guy. It relies heavily on shock humor and sometimes it gets them in trouble.[/QUOTE]

Yeah, but this joke isn't the type that will get them in trouble. The Jesus jokes are the timebomb that is ticking down.
 
[quote name='Rig']
A little off-topic, but I have been kinda disappointed with this seasons FG episodes. I hope they pick it up a bit. On the other hand, American Dad has been getting quite good.[/QUOTE]

Rather strange and unsettling isn't it?

After seeing the family guy premiere I swore the show wouldn't last 5 episodes but it's become suprisingly decent.
 
[quote name='spoo']
This thread is shameless. I would like to make a plead to CAG to stop and think about how you are bringing CAG to the same level as the rest of the gaming community. Lets keep CAG a “mature” community that does not need “stab her in the uterus” jokes.[/QUOTE]

I'm fully capable of carrying on intelligent, meaningful and well thought out discussions. However, I don't see why I should extend the effort when the subject matter is some nut getting bent out of shape over a cartoon that is both aired with a disclaimer AND is only aired because of its 'risque' nature.

Asinine crap like this is why this country is going to hell.
'Gee, you need to unwrap the soap first?'
'Wow... my coffee was hot?'
'I may of been breaking into your house, but I slipped on your rug so I'll sue you and win!'

Just another waste of life that should be remedied with a bullet.
 
bread's done
Back
Top