[quote name='bottlenut']Regarding the last two messages ---- Reread my rant about the PSP. I never said a word about DS' launch being strong or weak on games (though it was rather lean ... though not for long). The main points I touched on were about Sony's greed, its broken promises and its hype-driven hardware. My mention about Nintendo games wasn't about the DS in particular -- but about Nintendo games in general (on the Cube, GBA, N64 etc), which are consistently the most innovative, well-thought-out and long-lasting (in terms of fun). Why? Because of genius developers and its insistence on high quality (vs. flooding the market with a mass of junk games and a handful of A-plus ones). Nintendo has the exclusive trademark characters other systems' don't and will never have: Mario, Zelda, Fox and tons more. Say what you will about these "kiddie" games, but Nintendo's insistence on high quality is rarely surpassed. Mario 64 is but one example. The game never wavered from its $50 shelf price during the entire lifespan of the Nintendo 64 because of its awesome graphics, top-quality and simple fun. Seen it on the DS? Probably not (you're too busy listening to Sony-media hype) but the game's even better than the original. So obviously it makes an early port worth the DS' owners time. More are coming. Plenty more ... Seen the Cubes' exclusive Resident Evil series? RE, RE Zero, RE 4 -- again, second to none (and a whole lot longer than the two-hours-to-beat Metal Gear series that Sony fanboys harp about). ...Sony has more games to be sure, but the vast, vast bulk end up in the bargain bins. And very few are Sony's own. ... I mean look at one of Sony's PS2 launch title -- a fireworks game? Gimme a break. So yah' gonna ignore 99% of this rant also? Deal with reality. Sony's got you and a whole lot of others brainwashed, and they love you all the way to the bank.
[/quote]
Ok first and foremost, the enter key and paragraph breaks are your friend!
Now, as far as my post was concerned it was a reaction to Maynard's post, not yours. Maynard's post just happened to be a reply to yours.
Also, in your response you say that Mario 64 never dropped below $50, not true. It was actually one of the first games to be in Nintendo's line of player's choice. Later there was Goldeneye and the rest of the must have N64 games. A little point, but something that bugged me nonetheless.
Now your argument over the length of RE-exclusive games. Its just ridiculous to say that a game is good or bad based on how long it takes. There's many people that can beat REmake and RE0 in around 2 hours. The designers even gave an incentive to beat it that fast! You have to be good with the game to do it. Besides that, what about the Gamecube exclusive Metal Gear Solid The Twin Snakes?!?
As far as launch games go? I guarantee you that despite XX/XY being a good game, its short game time (but wait a game can only be good if its long, right?!?) is going to send it to the bargain bin. It'll be nice and cozy right next to Ping Pals and Sprung.
Now for PSP's launch titles? No less than 24, something for everyone. There's still a little more than 1/3 that number on the DS and its taking forever for games to come out. The system launched 3 months ago, where's the games?
Sony has me brainwashed all the way to the bank? As a matter of fact, my PS2 is my least favorite home console for beginners. Am I buying a PSP? Absolutely. Does that make me a Sony-tool? Who cares?!? Really, you have to be kidding yourself if Sony looks more like an "evil" company than Nintendo is. They are both corporations that will both laugh to their respective banking branches.