[quote name='tsunami_bomb3r']
damn. too late to get my two cents in...
aw
it, it's the internet.
Any arguements against OP need to reconsider their hypothetical sittuations and look at numbers. He was in a gamestop with two employees that could vouch for the buyer (or provide the protection of an open environment with high pedestrian traffic should the deal go south), physical distance or significant ammounts of time were not an issue, and he was offered a better deal by the potential buyer -- $170 cash money as opposed to "$"160 (really just a number in a computer at a store).
OP makes the point that wii sports was not included. look at eBay prices (the only place to have a decent chance of finding a copy), and you'll see ~$50. And the point of the wii ("we") is communal gaming. The first thing everyone wants to do is play Bowling or Tennis when they see my Wii (giggidy). Wii Sports is part of the essential Wii experience
also, minus box and instructions (lowering the BUYER'S resale value substatially) the buyer's already out ~$60-$70 worth of resale value.
the arguement concerining tax -- i've always been taxed on credit at gamestop AND gamecrazy here in so-cal.
and $10? I'd take it. $10 is a lot of money, especially in the world of videogames. is it less than $20 or $30? of course. But those are hypothetical numbers. the guy
might have come up $20 or $30, but that's up in the air. it's a DEFINATE that he could have been up by $10. So what's going to happen when the guy's hurting for gas money, or at work the day before payday? he's boned, that's what he is, because the local sandwich place doesn't take gamestop credit.
in coclusion, the internet is for arguing, bad spelling, and grammar errors, people too stubborn to take a deal on principle should be shot, thecheapestgamer doesn't really have an opinion and just enjoys being a conservative devil's advocate douche, and i understand the OP's blinding frustration at the people who take the seller's side with innane, imagined, unfounded reasoning.
btw, thecheapestgamer, this is NOTHING like the billg thread. he was a douchebag who took potshots at alzheimer's patients, refused a deal much better than any of us argueing the day after Black Friday could ever have dreamed of, and thought he was witty. He wasn't. Being sardonic for a three page rant just makes you sound like a prick.[/quote]
Who said I wasn't a prick? I like to argue, I'll admit that. But, what I was saying to the OP was that the seller had a right to deny them the Wii because it was still THEIR system and they could do with it as they please. For whatever reason, they preferred the Gamestop credit over the OP's money. Was it stupid of them to not take $10 more than Gamestop? Obviously not in their eyes, since as many have said already, the OP could've been trying to hand them counterfeit cash or swindle them in some other way.
Now, before you go off and say that I'm calling the OP a con artist and a scammer, let it be said that I am NOT in any way, shape or form calling them such things.
However, the seller had their right to refuse the offer, perhaps hoping that the OP would've added some more value to sweeten the deal. But, they did not and instead came home and bitched and moaned about how 'stupid' the seller was and was hoping they would get a bunch of 'yeah you were right' responses.
The OP came off as bitter and dejected and almost every response in favor of them seems to trumpet the $10 more offer as some big deal, when it's not in the scheme of things. Now, if the offer were $50 more, I could see the OP having a kinipshit over someone rejecting that sort of offer. But, even I would've denied a meager $10 more offer for something I'm selling to Gamestop, mainly because I have a suspicious nature and would fear the above mentioned counterfeit cash scenario.