[quote name='jkanownik']No one owes you anything. The sooner you realize this the happier you will be. This extends far beyond video games.[/QUOTE]
[quote name='BattleChicken']I disagree. Comparing SC1 to SC2, without brood war in consideration, you get about the same number of missions. SC1 had 10 missions for each race, totaling 30 missions. SC2 has 29 missions. The SC2 missions, though, are way more intricate, engaging, and complex. I replayed all the SC1 missions not all that long ago, and I think I powered through them in something like 5 or 6 hours. I understand that SC2 takes 15-20 hours to complete.
Thats just talking about missions.. SC2 also has 9 challenge maps (i think it was), more in-depth tutorials, and a far more fleshed out game world. SC1 had the mission briefing screen and the missions - that was it. SC2 blows away SC1 in terms of scope.
The reality is that SC2 provides much more content than SC1, and If you account for inflation, SC2 cost about the same as SC1 did - $60 in 2010 has the same buying power as $44.83 in 1998.
If the expansions hold to the same level of polish and quality as Wings of Liberty, complaining about a $30 or $40 price tag is downright absurd.[/QUOTE]
After playing for a long time you're right. The game stands on its own. However to offer up three views in the 1st game and then only 1 in the sequel I think it's acceptable to feel like the experience was missing something.
I'm also not sure if the Protoss and the Zerg are going to be as easy to get behind story wise since the characters are harder to relate to. I think the Protoss are bad ass though, so I'll play that. The Zerg though? The only one that talks is the Queen of Blades. So you can't really expect to get to know the Zerg like you have the Terran.
Regardless of inflation, the standard for PC games is currently 50 bucks, and it's my God given right to bitch and I am going to do it!
