You dont "buy" Surge, you only 'rent' it! (I love Surge BTW.)
So I'll use this as a jump off for something that's been nagging at me. I'm itching to build a new system (though I'll probably hold off till be know more about the PS5 et al. to decide if I want faster IPC or 'moar corez!'). But something keeps popping up everywhere I look and that is people shunning the stock coolers in view of better aftermarket ones (air or liquid) to get more out of their systems. I kinda understand this as a mid-rig-life upgrade, but if you're doing it at the time of initial purchase, why not just put that towards a better chip?
I understand that I am spoiled being near 3 (!) Micro Centers, so chip prices are lower, but I cant see the benefit of spending, say $20 on a cheap air cooler to overclock a Ryzen 2600 when that same $20 would get you a 2600X with similar performance out the box. Or worse, spending $80 on a liquid cooler for a R 2600, when that same cash could net you a 2700X and not have to worry about the 'silicon lottery.' Am I missing something? Or is my use case (in a noisy house, with 3 kids, tower tucked away and unseen) clouding me from the other benefits?
I'm not morally opposed to overclocking or aftermarket cooling. My FX8320E is sitting OCed to 4.45GHz on a ubiquitous Hyper 212 Evo (which inst even that quiet, but I digress). But given the choices, would the bros rather go for aftermarket and overclock or better chip on stock? T.I.A.