[quote name='shrike4242']It's not a CAG trade, it's a contest. Random chance determines who ends up with what, if anything. Feedback isn't appropriate.
If there's a problem in the established trade process with someone not followin through on a trade, then that's something we'll deal with at that time.[/quote]
I am sorry Shrike, but I respectfully disagree.
I do not understand the how the nature of the transaction or how the role of chance comes into play here. If the winners were going to receive feedback I would agree, but they would not.
I believe the exchange of an item offered during a pool would be considered a transaction. No one entered the pool with the intent to inflate their feedback rating. And since the winners will not receive any feedback I don't think anyone's feedback score will be significantly inflated.
As taken from the CAG Guide to Trading and Selling guidlines, "The Trader Rating system is the only "official" rating system here, chronicling how many times (and how effectively) that user has completed a transaction on CAG."
Those that have, or will, live up to their side of a bargain should, in my opinion, be rewarded with the use of positive feedback. As such, someone who does not live up to their promise should have consequences. Wouldn't we want to acknowledge those who did not act as promised through negative feedback? Otherwise, there is no penalty for persons who decide not to send what they offered.
Not trying to beat a dead horse here, but I do feel I owe something to those who have followed through on the arrangement.