[quote name='WhipSmartBanky']I've got a beef with JSweeney. To plunge right into it, of all of JSweeney's exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "Arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming." I don't know where he came up with this, but his statement is dead wrong. He refuses to come to terms with reality. JSweeney prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination. Unyielding rigidity is just as much a threat to the continuity of things as disorderly, insensitive sensationalism -- and JSweeney knows it.
Make special note of that point, because he claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to call evil good and good evil. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by JSweeney's bootlickers. The truth is that JSweeney's lapdogs consider his grievances a breath of fresh air. I, however, find them more like the fetid odor of phallocentrism. If JSweeney has spurred us to call for a return to the values that made this country great, then JSweeney may have accomplished a useful thing. People often get the impression that deceitful, demented administrators and JSweeney's hangers-on are separate entities. Not so. When one catches cold, the other sneezes. As proof, note that I wonder what would happen if JSweeney really did usher in the rule of the Antichrist and the apocalyptic end times. There's a spooky thought.
Almost everyone will wholeheartedly agree that what I take much more seriously than belligerent extortionists are pestiferous drug addicts, but he likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why if the past is any indication of the future, JSweeney will once again attempt to impair the practice of democracy. What's more, he will stop at nothing to vilify our history, character, values, and traditions. This may sound outrageous, but if it were fiction I would have thought of something more credible. As it stands, on a television program last night, I heard one of this country's top scientists conclude that, "JSweeney appears to have a problem with common sense and logic." That's exactly what I have so frequently argued, and I am pleased to have my view confirmed by so eminent an individual. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that if you read between the lines of his belief systems, you'll undoubtedly find that if I hear his surrogates say, "McCarthyism is a noble goal" one more time, I'm going to throw up. I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like JSweeney spread phlegmatic, naive views. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world.
The question that's on everyone's mind these days is, "Why can't he relieve his aching sense of inadequacy without having to call for ritualistic invocations of needlessly formal rules?" To rephrase that question, what is it about our society that makes vexatious nutcases like JSweeney desire to feed us a diet of robbery, murder, violence, and all other manner of trials and tribulations? You know the answer, don't you? You probably also know that he has, at times, called me "dysfunctional" or "crafty". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to descend to character assassination and name calling. It's likely that before long he will beat plowshares into swords if we don't stop him now. This implies that last summer, I attempted what I knew would be a hopeless task. I tried to convince JSweeney that his obdurate, cantankerous ruses induce paralysis of the cerebrum. As I expected, JSweeney was unconvinced. He has always used racism as his moorings, and if you don't believe me, then you should give peace a chance. The reason he wants to create massive civil unrest is that he's entirely rotten. If you believe you have another explanation for his prissy, socially inept behavior, then please write and tell me about it. I feel this way because I find that some of JSweeney's choices of words in his campaigns would not have been mine. For example, I would have substituted "supercilious" for "stereophotogrammetry" and "crapulous" for "piezocrystallization."
JSweeney has commented that we're supposed to shut up and smile when he says overbearing things. I would love to refute that, but there seems to be no need, seeing as his comment is lacking in common sense. There is good reason to believe that if we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to reveal the constant tension between centripetal and centrifugal forces of dialogized heteroglossia resulting from his artifices. I wish that some of JSweeney's stooges would ask themselves, "Why am I helping JSweeney elevate his undertakings to prominence as epistemological principles?"
Whatever he claims to the contrary, I unmistakably wouldn't want to promote addlepated ideologies, such as irrationalism. I would, on the other hand, love to foster mutual understanding. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. I find it sickening to watch him reduce history to an overdetermined, wireframe sketch of what are, in reality, complex, dynamic events. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that he has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature, then there is definitely no hope for you.
If a cogent, logical argument entered JSweeney's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. Inarticulate fogeys who adopt approaches that have not been tested to try to solve problems that have not been well-defined will, hopefully, eventually be replaced by people who believe in freedom, justice, and the pursuit of personal growth. That is to say, every so often, you'll see JSweeney lament, flog himself, cry mea culpa for seeking to steal our birthrights, and vow never again to be so tasteless. Sadly, he always reverts to his old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that if I have a bias, it is only against stubborn chuckleheads who toy with our opinions. Due to the power relationship between the dominator and the dominated, his predaceous, whiney perversions are in full flower, and their poisonous petals of commercialism are blooming all around us. Most of you reading this letter have your hearts in the right place. Now follow your hearts with actions.
Better, far better, that Man were without the gift of speech than that he use it as JSweeney does. Better that Man could neither read nor write than have his head and heart perverted by the bleeding-heart and gin-swilling tommyrot that oozes from JSweeney's pen. And better that the cut of Man's coat and the number of his buttons were fixed by statute and enforced by penalties than that JSweeney should threaten, degrade, poison, bulldoze, and kill this world of ours. While the question of who is right and who is wrong in this case is an interesting one, it is also something that I cannot and will not comment on, and not just because we mustn't let him paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy. This much is clear: His insults are not our only concern. To state the matter in a few words, he asserts that everyone who doesn't share his beliefs is an impudent, unforgiving infidel deserving of death and damnation. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence.
JSweeney will push our efforts two steps backward long before he can convert me into one of his slaves. His pronouncements all stem from one, simple, faulty premise -- that his magic-bullet explanations are not worth getting outraged about. Officious, mawkish anti-intellectualism is the shadow cast on society by his words, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance. As a practical matter, I find that I am embarrassed. Embarrassed that some people just don't realize that JSweeney's reports are based on a denial of reality, on the substitution of a deliberately falsified picture of the world in place of reality. And this dishonesty, this refusal to admit the truth, will have some very serious consequences for all of us sooner or later. JSweeney says that everyone would be a lot safer if he were to monitor all of our personal communications and financial transactions -- even our library records. Why on Earth does JSweeney need to monitor our library records? If you need help in answering that question, you may note that I once had a nightmare in which JSweeney was free to take rights away from individuals on the basis of prejudice, myth, irrational belief, inaccurate information, and outright falsehood. When I awoke, I realized that this nightmare was frighteningly close to reality. For instance, I leave it to more capable and intrepid folks to explore the full ramifications of JSweeney's sermons. So what's the connection between that and JSweeney's manuscripts? The connection is that he thinks we want him to lure the macabre into his camp. Excuse me, but maybe he keeps saying that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to his stentorian prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers. Isn't that claim getting a little shopworn? I mean, by allowing him to tear down all theoretical frameworks for addressing the issue, we are allowing him to play puppet master. My concern and outrage are not directed solely at JSweeney, but at all those who seek to subject us to the illiterate yapping of malignant, diabolic dunderheads. That's self-evident, and even JSweeney would probably agree with me on that. Even so, this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact.
Even his votaries don't care much for his political objectives; they simply wish to associate with other pugnacious freaks and advocate fatalistic acceptance of a malodorous new world order. I won't mince my words: JSweeney wants all of us to believe that he has his moral compass in tact. That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. Documents written by his hired goons typically include the line, "Human life is expendable", in large, 30-point type, as if the size of the font gives weight to the words. In reality, all that that fancy formatting really does is underscore the fact that JSweeney twists every argument into some sort of "struggle" between two parties. JSweeney unvaryingly constitutes the underdog party, which is what he claims gives him the right to twist the teaching of history to suit his depraved purposes. Still, the issue of what to do about JSweeney's mumpish rodomontades is far from settled. The letter you just read should be seen as a starting point for dialogue on this controversial issue.[/quote]
That's it! I'm going to have to break this down, point by point, and answer it... while qouting the entire thing and distinguishing it from my own comments by bolding it.
You'll all come to know my point, and for those that don't....
Human life is expendable
** For people joining our program in progress, Banky used a compliant generator, and all of my comments in regard to it are in jest, and rather self-efacing.***
[/quote]
ing commerical while me and my roomate were eating mcdonalds and stood up in anger saying WHAT THE 
[/quote]
