I don't know, she's pretty good looking, but yeah, not supermodel level. She's definitely not ugly though, and I guarantee 99.9999% of all the single CAGs on here would hit it (including the OP)
For arguments sake I'll say she's not that good looking, but it let it be known that if I ever came within 100 yards of her I'd be bragging my whole life.
[quote name='2Fast']For arguments sake I'll say she's not that good looking, but it let it be known that if I ever came within 100 yards of her I'd be bragging my whole life.[/QUOTE]
[quote name='PRMega']Alright, those pics in Maxim really don't do her justice, IMO. I think she's really attractive generally, but not so much in those shots.[/QUOTE]
I agree with OP. Shes a dog. Even her giant eyebrows cant save her from that. Im not saying shes a bad person or anything, just not pleasing to look at in any way.
[quote name='trunks982']I got my new Maxim in the mail yesterday. Sarah Silverman? Hell no. Is she the ugliest cover girl on Maxim history? What u guys think?[/quote]
I challenge you sir to a bout of fistycuffs. She's a) hot b) funny.
I think she's pretty cute, even adorible sometimes, and she genuinely looks 10 years younger than she is (she's 37, I believe). Her main problem is that she isn't funny at all. Yeah.
[quote name='mykevermin']If nothing else, she isn't talking in those photos, so that's a plus.[/quote]
Haha - I totally agree. She's not that funny, IMO - she says some funny stuff but most of it is just for shock value coming out of a semi-cute girl's mouth.
Her face is as long as a yard stick...not to mention if I didn't know who she was I'd question if she was male or female from looking at certain pics of her.