[quote name='eldad9']Obviously RPGs, which focus on story and gameplay mechanics would still be interesting to play a decade later, but fighting games (for example) would be superceded by current technology so almost nobody would want to play a 10 year old fighting game.
A sequel or movie based on the franchise also renews interest in (and increases demand for) a game.
P.S. Defender: you suck. Really. The sky is blue because blue light has a shorter wavelength, and is scattered nearly ten times more than light at the other end of the visible spectrum (see
http://www.wikipedia.com/wiki/Rayleigh_scattering ). Did you know that?
If you don't feel like answering a question, don't. You don't have to imply the question was stupid. The original poster's question was valid. Your response was not.[/quote]
I wouldn't agree with the fighting game analogy 100%. Some folks consider Street Fighter II CE to be the best iteration of the series, and others feel Mortal Kombat II was MK's peak. Hell, even I get the urge to go back and play the older versions (Tekken II or III is better than Tag or IV, for me anyways).
And while I agree with the general gist of the last part of your post, I frown upon the harshness of it. I think (or should I say hope?) Defender was joking.
Besides, he gets a break, he gives us cheap ass deals.