[quote name='evanft']No. One of the first thing you learn in ethics/philosophy is that opinions can indeed be wrong.
If I said that, in my opinion, that Nintendo is not a video games company because I saw Mario toys in a store, would I be right? No, my opinion would be wrong because my argument is not sound. I'll show you:
If Nintendo makes anything other that video games, then they are not a video game company.
Nintendo makes Mario toys.
Therefore, Nintendo is not a video game company.
Now, my argument is valid, as the conclusion follows from the premises. But, since the first premise is untrue, the argument is not sound and the conclusion is therefore wrong.
I'll show you with 11111111's point:
If a game is good/classic, then it is a Greatest Hit.
Suikoden 2 and Rez are not Greatest Hits.
Therefore, Suikoden 2 and Rez are not good/classic.
Like the Nintendo example, the argument is valid, as the conclusion does indeed follow from the premises. But, the first premise is gain untrue, since there are many games that are good/classic that aren't Greatest Hits. So, the conclusion is wrong.[/QUOTE]
Sorry buddy, but I too went to college, and your logic doesn't hold up. An opinion is a person's idea about something, this idea is not a fact and so it can't be right or wrong. Its like saying chicken tastes better than steak, or Suikoden I is better than II. When you state "Nintendo is not a video game company", it is no longer an opinion, it is a fact that can be proven or disproven (in this case obviously false).
As for OP, congrats on your find, but w/ comments like the whole "classics/GH" thing, its easy to see why you might annoy other people...