[quote name='CaseyRyback']I always wondered why I had all this extra stuff attached my my account. Thanks for letting me know that.
Just because you wrote some fluff piece about the game doesn't mean that the game isn't going to be terrible and that anyone who buys it isn't throwing money down the drain. 1200 points for something that looks terrible, isn't done by the original developer, and doesn't retain anything that made the original good deserves to be shit on hard. I stand by my assertion and counter that you are insulting people by trying to convince them that the artwork at the top doesn't look like dog shit and looks awesome because it is in the vein of some anime/manga.[/QUOTE]
What you don't seem to understand is that your opinion about a game or its visuals is not a fact. You see, people can like things that
you do not like without being wrong or idiotic or anything of the sort. You're not in a position to determine for the rest of the world what is good and what is bad. What you said is rude and doesn't allow for the existence of alternate opinions.
The art style is based on a particular Asian art style. It may not appeal to you (or even a large portion of Western audiences), but that doesn't mean it's not perfectly appropriate for its home territory. Art is in fact entirely subjective - some people will like it and some people will dislike it. Everything you're stating about it is an opinion, while what I just said is a fact.
Now perhaps they could have chosen an art style with greater mass appeal, but the developers basically made the game they wanted to make. That's their right as developers/artists. If it doesn't sell well as a result of their choice, they'll feel the consequences of their choice. But I think it's far wiser to judge a game based on its gameplay, not the graphics. This game could be a ton of fun, but you'll probably never see that as a result of your bias.