Reading further into the features/capabilities of the XB1 and the PS4, I'm beginning to sway towards the XB1. DRM is the future of digital media. At some point, it will become a standard within the entertainment industry (the distribution side anyway). Although this "always connected" mentality might be arriving a bit soon (especially with the lack of available WANs throughout the country), it's a step in the right direction.
Sure, there are downfalls: used games are a thing of the past, the Kinect is always on and the lack of offline play - all of which will definitely be a burden in the beginning. However, in my honest opinion, the good outweighs the bad.
I'm not laying down and accepting DRM; I'm embracing it. The restrictions act as a minor inconvenience, but the room for innovation is unremarkable. One positive impact include games going on sale more often due to the lack of having to cover the additional licenses being thrown around (peer-to-peer sharing and used game shops like GameStop).
Microsoft is implementing a similar system Steam has in place... and I, for one, welcome the change with open arms.
/rant over
See, people come in here and post stuff like this and it starts the argument all over again. You talk about the good outweighing the bad, and list all the negative things that come along with the X1. Then, you say that it's worth it because the "room for innovation is unremarkable" (pretty sure you meant remarkable...but hey...Freudian slip). After that, the only positive you name is the presumption that these policies will allow games to be cheaper (which is yet to be confirmed at all), since the X1 won't be "gimped" by the used game market (even though you can share games among 10 people). And finally, comes the comparison to Steam (and you're definitely not the first to do that).
Here is how it's not like Steam AT ALL.
1. Steam has competitors to help keep prices low (GMG, Amazon, Gamer's Gate, GOG, Origin, etc, etc. I could seriously go on all day)
2. Steam has an offline mode. I can be disconnected from the internet for days and still play my single player games just fine.
3. Steam is "backwards compatible". There are games on Steam that are 15+ years old. I can buy/build a new PC, greatly improve my experience, AND still play all of my games.
So, for the one millionth time (and sure to be one million and one in a page or two), how in the freaking hell is the X1 anything like Steam? I'm not saying that the X1 doesn't have a chance to get there. And I agree with everyone who believes this is how it SHOULD go. But as of yet, we've gotten little indication from Microsoft that this is their intent. For now, we know there are limited used game sales, 24 hour online checks, required Kinect, and $60 MSRP games. Right now, that is what has been confirmed. Everything else is speculation, wishful thinking, and optimism. And there's nothing wrong with any of those things. But it's hard to build a case on hypothetical situations. Honestly, I hope the X1 is as great as Steam. That would be amazing! But they've got some work to do to get there.
*don't mean to sound harsh toward you, labelmeoriginal. But seriously, this keeps coming up, and it starts to feel as if people don't even bother to think about what the differences actually are.