[quote name='peteloaf']This game brings to light something that I have never understood - how does haing actual NFL players and teams in a game make it better? I'd like to argue that they actually make the game worse. Case in point Madden - year after year people pay full price and reward minimal innovation just to have the latest rosters. A game with fantasy teams and players can't rely on roster updated to sell the game so they have to do something new to sell the game. If 2K wants to release an '09, '10, & '11 version of this they will need to do something new every year. Maybe I'm wrong and having the correct name on a player's jersey is more important than innovation, I don't know.[/quote] NFL teams and players don't make games better, they make games sell. You can like whatever you want, but the numbers don't lie.
As for the guy who asked about the EA/NFL deal, it goes through 2010, and according to the recent Game Informer article about EA losing it's touch (which is completely true), both parties seem to be happy with the deal, as they are both making money hand-over-fist.
Look, I'm not saying this isn't good news. It's great news, if the game does feature the old school players that it's been rumored to have. I just think that people shouldn't get there hopes up on this series battling Madden for years to come, and in turn, forcing the only NFL game in town to step up its game. Does anyone honestly think a non-licensed football game is gonna sell enough copies to warrant 2K sticking with it for the long haul? Sure, 2K5 sold pretty damn well, but that's because it had a $20 price point, and people could buy both games if they wanted to. But with the next generation here, how many casual sports fans (the type EA makes the most money off of) are gonna spend $60 on a game filled with generic teams and (possibly) generic players, when they could buy the new Madden game for the same price, which they probably buy every year?