[quote name='wubb']But Hannibal Rising sucked, didn't it?
I'm not sure if Redbox will get an extended cut or not, I assume they had the FF original release back when it first dropped and I think I've seen that one on HBO or one of the movie channels.
Ghost Rider is a possibility. I think it is supposed to be pretty bad as well, but I was a fan of the comics.
Warner - Why can't other companies just buy copies and put them out for rent? Maybe if Blockbuster gets some copies in a week or so before it's official street date to rent and so then they'd have a certain exclusive time. That I could see.
EDIT - Nope you're right did a search and Blockbuster has exclusive rental rights for Weinstein movies. But I thought companies could rent copies of movies/games/whatever with or without the blessing of the maker. Didn't Nintendo try suing to prevent game rentals back in the NES days and get shot down? At any rate I think HR pre-dates the deal, or at least that title wasn't mentioned as one of the first in the article I read. Grindhouse was one of the ones mentioned so that just means I won't be watching Grindhouse until it's on HBO, etc (unless other rental places ignore the deal.) Dumb deal for Weinstein company IMO unless BBV is paying through the nose.
Of course with Redbox they could just say they are actually selling the DVD for $25 charged $1 per day, but if the customer returns it they cease the future charges.

[/quote]
So my understanding of the legalise behind the contract and renting and blah blah blah is the following.
When a rental company receives movies from a distrubution company specifically for renting, the rental company doesn't have to pay for the movies (or pays a minimal price for them). But in return, the company must give a certain cut of all rental fees collected on said movie (say 50% for the first week, 30% week 2, 20% week 3, nothing there after). However, thanks to the "first sale doctrine," there is nothing to stop another company from buying a bunch of non-rental copies (read- retail), opening them up and renting them out (as decided by the Supreme court approx. 30 years ago).
In the end, the non-Blockbuster company pays more up front (paying whatever the distro's retail price is), but has no back end fees. Depending on the popularity of the movie and how many retail copies you get, this may or may not be a good tactic (mostly not a good tactic, but there are exceptions).