You can have my civil rights...I wasn't using them!

[quote name='msdmoney'][quote name='MrBadExample']What's truly sad is that most of these students scored better than Dubya would have.[/quote]

[quote name='camoor'][quote name='javeryh']Most high school students are dumbasses.[/quote]

Most (51%) of Americans are dumbasses. Look in the whitehouse if you don't believe me.[/quote]

What do either of these have to do with the discussion about high school students....

answer=nothing.[/quote]

So naive, I blame "no child left behind".

However, I guess ignorance is bliss...
 
[quote name='The_Continental']I don't get how you can say this and have Che in your sig. Media manipulation was his bread and butter.

[quote name='karmapolice620']Im a high school student but I do not believe the government should be involved with the media. [/quote][/quote]

Yes he did distort views with media manipulation, but he was an all around great person...Some say he went crazy or finatical at the end of his run, but I do not believe this to be true. He led a great rebellion and free'd cuba. I would rather not start a flame war on cuban life style or anything to that degree so please dont bother to provoke me.
 
The Bush administration is also paying pundits to promote their agendas,
Here's the latest media interference, straight from the "Ministry of Truth" (on education, no less...)

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=394175

Also, the kids are confused because they are taught to fear events like 9/11 and surrender freedoms to the government in exchange for "safety from terrorism".

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
 
[quote name='MrBadExample'][quote name='MorPhiend'][quote name='MrBadExample'][quote name='msdmoney']What do either of these have to do with the discussion about high school students....

answer=nothing.[/quote]

You're going to be a very busy boy if you point out every post that is not directly related to the topic at hand.[/quote]

He was just doing what I was trying to refrain from doing. Stop showing your hatred if you don't want people to point it out. It's like how John Kerry conceded the election, but Michael Moore can't even get over it. Just let it go. It's over.[/quote]

I'm over the election but that still doesn't make Dubya a smart man which is all I was saying.[/quote]

The point is that this has nothing to do with the topic and anytime someone can, certain people will start their bombthrowing tactics in unrelated matters because they aren't over even the election of 2000, much less 2004.

[quote name='camoor'][quote name='msdmoney'][quote name='MrBadExample']What's truly sad is that most of these students scored better than Dubya would have.[/quote]

[quote name='camoor'][quote name='javeryh']Most high school students are dumbasses.[/quote]

Most (51%) of Americans are dumbasses. Look in the whitehouse if you don't believe me.[/quote]

What do either of these have to do with the discussion about high school students....

answer=nothing.[/quote]

So naive, I blame "no child left behind".

However, I guess ignorance is bliss...[/quote]


Yes, you are right. Not a single dem supported the measure and this nations youth were 100% enrolled in MENSA, then this Act came along and they all became retarded. :roll:

Hello, I'm from reality. Where do you live???

[quote name='Mouse']Well Kerry didn't complain because he didn't want his political carreer to be shot. Look at what happened to Gore where he contested the 2000 election. Moore can afford to keep complaining, even when everyone else has given up hope.[/quote]

That's just a bunch of political rhetoric garbage. Besides, I don't care what his motivations were. I thought the same when I first heard the news, but then I got out of my class and checked out the consession myself, and either he was genuine and has a lot more class than I had previously known to be true, or he deserves an Oscar. My bet is the former. But only John Kerry knows. But it all goes back to my belief that just about everyone wants the best thing for everyone, we all just have a different idea of how it should be done. And John Kerry definitely exemplified this idea that day.


Now stop the political bashing (totally unfounded political bashing, at that) and get back on topic. In case you didn't know, the topic is "You can have my civil rights...I wasn't using them!" And it is based on a report saying that HS students think that Freedom of the Press goes too far, which ironically, seems to be a complete spin job (referring to how the issue was presented to the students, how the data was handled, and then how it has been presented).
 
[quote name='camoor']The Bush administration is also paying pundits to promote their agendas,
Here's the latest media interference, straight from the "Ministry of Truth" (on education, no less...)

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=394175

Also, the kids are confused because they are taught to fear events like 9/11 and surrender freedoms to the government in exchange for "safety from terrorism".

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
[/quote]

Who teaches them to fear? Parents, teachers, religious leaders (localized for the individual, I'm not talking Falwell here), peers? I'm curious how you think this works (hint: Barry Glassner wrote a fantastic book called "The Culture of Fear").

Also, Armstrong Williams is the first to be exposed. Maggie Gallagher and Michael McManus have also been paid, with American tax dollars, to promote an agenda. What's fascinating about this is the idea that all three are vehemently conservative, and likely would have embraced anything from the Bush White House.

On the other hand, is that true? Fox New's Skeletor-looking sidekick Alan Colmes seemed to point out that Armstrong wrote an anti-NCLB article just before getting $$$paid$$$. His tune has subsequently changed since then. (Article Link)

I think that rockhero (?) pointed out the poor wording used to ask these questions, which is something I wholeheartedly agree with; who studies research methodology anymore? (well, I do...but I digress).

Here are two questions for you:

(1)Do you think the government should be less involved in your well-being after retirement?
(2)Do you support Social Security benefits cuts?

What I think of this survey is directly related to the poor (I will say poor, but not intentionally misleading) questions in the OP's cited survey.

myke.
 
I think the problem is that the press is required to disseminate information and quite often they abuse this power to increase ratings. For example scientific studies will come out and in some cases it is useful for certain people to know the results but the news starts treating the results like established fact and everyone goes nuts. A perfect example of this is the dangers of over hydration (drinking to much water) that some news groups have been reporting on, yet most Americans don't have to worry about water poisoning because they drink far too little of it in the first place.
 
[quote name='MorPhiend'][quote name='camoor'][quote name='msdmoney'][quote name='MrBadExample']What's truly sad is that most of these students scored better than Dubya would have.[/quote]

[quote name='camoor'][quote name='javeryh']Most high school students are dumbasses.[/quote]

Most (51%) of Americans are dumbasses. Look in the whitehouse if you don't believe me.[/quote]

What do either of these have to do with the discussion about high school students....

answer=nothing.[/quote]

So naive, I blame "no child left behind".

However, I guess ignorance is bliss...[/quote]


Yes, you are right. Not a single dem supported the measure and this nations youth were 100% enrolled in MENSA, then this Act came along and they all became retarded. :roll:

Hello, I'm from reality. Where do you live???
[/quote]

You're inferring that "no child left behind" was a bipartisan bill and that students were better off after it was enacted? Sounds like somebody's been sniffing too much elmer's glue...
 
[quote name='camoor'][quote name='msdmoney'][quote name='MrBadExample']What's truly sad is that most of these students scored better than Dubya would have.[/quote]

[quote name='camoor'][quote name='javeryh']Most high school students are dumbasses.[/quote]

Most (51%) of Americans are dumbasses. Look in the whitehouse if you don't believe me.[/quote]

What do either of these have to do with the discussion about high school students....

answer=nothing.[/quote]

So naive, I blame "no child left behind".

However, I guess ignorance is bliss...[/quote]

Naive? You make hasty assumptions. My point still stands there was no need to make comments like this, they instigate and derail topics, stick to the topic at hand.


[quote name='MrBadExample']
I'm over the election but that still doesn't make Dubya a smart man which is all I was saying.[/quote]

This thread isn't about how the intelligence of Bush, it's about high school students answering a survey.
 
[quote name='camoor'][quote name='MorPhiend'][quote name='camoor'][quote name='msdmoney'][quote name='MrBadExample']What's truly sad is that most of these students scored better than Dubya would have.[/quote]

[quote name='camoor'][quote name='javeryh']Most high school students are dumbasses.[/quote]

Most (51%) of Americans are dumbasses. Look in the whitehouse if you don't believe me.[/quote]

What do either of these have to do with the discussion about high school students....

answer=nothing.[/quote]

So naive, I blame "no child left behind".

However, I guess ignorance is bliss...[/quote]


Yes, you are right. Not a single dem supported the measure and this nations youth were 100% enrolled in MENSA, then this Act came along and they all became retarded. :roll:

Hello, I'm from reality. Where do you live???
[/quote]

You're inferring that "no child left behind" was a bipartisan bill and that students were better off after it was enacted? Sounds like somebody's been sniffing too much elmer's glue...[/quote]

I never said that. You are still not comprehending reality. What I think about the bill has nothing to do with it, so I won't go in that direction. You said that the topic is completely to be blamed on NCLB and that everyone who doesn't believe as you do (making them ignorant) is wrong. That is wholely erroneous! There is no way that children were way intelligent, then the bill was passed and they suddenly, in mass, became stupid. That is your "arguement!" Look at the people you quoted! Then you said that you blame it all on NCLB! That is saying that before they were not so stupid, but now they suddenly became so! I never stated my opinion, and you have no right telling me what I was inferring or believing. But you're statements say exactly what I am talking about. The NCLB Act did not make our youth stupid!

My point (and msdmoney's) has not been to argue one side or the other, but to say that a few of you are talking about the wrong thing in the wrong forum. So if you (camoor) and Mr Bad Example want to start a thread devoted to your hatred of someone, something, whatever, go do it. But stop your thread crapping. Your posts have nothing to do with the "study." I don't have to read your thread, but I was wanting to hear a healthy discussion on the topic, and you are making it hard to do so.
 
[quote name='MorPhiend'][quote name='camoor'][quote name='MorPhiend'][quote name='camoor'][quote name='msdmoney'][quote name='MrBadExample']What's truly sad is that most of these students scored better than Dubya would have.[/quote]

[quote name='camoor'][quote name='javeryh']Most high school students are dumbasses.[/quote]

Most (51%) of Americans are dumbasses. Look in the whitehouse if you don't believe me.[/quote]

What do either of these have to do with the discussion about high school students....

answer=nothing.[/quote]

So naive, I blame "no child left behind".

However, I guess ignorance is bliss...[/quote]


Yes, you are right. Not a single dem supported the measure and this nations youth were 100% enrolled in MENSA, then this Act came along and they all became retarded. :roll:

Hello, I'm from reality. Where do you live???
[/quote]

You're inferring that "no child left behind" was a bipartisan bill and that students were better off after it was enacted? Sounds like somebody's been sniffing too much elmer's glue...[/quote]

I never said that. You are still not comprehending reality. What I think about the bill has nothing to do with it, so I won't go in that direction. You said that the topic is completely to be blamed on NCLB and that everyone who doesn't believe as you do (making them ignorant) is wrong. That is wholely erroneous! There is no way that children were way intelligent, then the bill was passed and they suddenly, in mass, became stupid. That is your "arguement!" Look at the people you quoted! Then you said that you blame it all on NCLB! That is saying that before they were not so stupid, but now they suddenly became so! I never stated my opinion, and you have no right telling me what I was inferring or believing. But you're statements say exactly what I am talking about. The NCLB Act did not make our youth stupid!

My point (and msdmoney's) has not been to argue one side or the other, but to say that a few of you are talking about the wrong thing in the wrong forum. So if you (camoor) and Mr Bad Example want to start a thread devoted to your hatred of someone, something, whatever, go do it. But stop your thread crapping. Your posts have nothing to do with the "study." I don't have to read your thread, but I was wanting to hear a healthy discussion on the topic, and you are making it hard to do so.[/quote]

First of all, you started the accusations. The "NCLB" comment was a joke, but I see it went way over your head. Yes, the NCLB is a bad act of law. No, it did not directly cause HS students to place less importance on their constitutinal-guaranteed civil rights.

Second, I do not hate, I am just pointing to some of the culprits responsible for this sad finding.

This topic was about the decreased importance high schoolers attribute to civil rights, and it is my theory that this is directly related to the Bush campaign of fear. The Bush administration played off of people's fears (drummed into their heads by seeing the plane crash into the building over and over and over) by grabbing more governmental power (Patriot act) and misleading the people into unwittingly adopting the neocon agenda (relating WMDs/unrelated terrorist groups to the Iraq war). These HS students are just ceding more power into the hands of a very secretive, power-hungry, "we know best" government because of their fear of terrorism and ignorance of the rest of the world (the ignorance can be partially blamed on education, especially when things like creationism are being taught as science in schools...).
 
[quote name='camoor'][quote name='MorPhiend'][quote name='camoor'][quote name='MorPhiend'][quote name='camoor'][quote name='msdmoney'][quote name='MrBadExample']What's truly sad is that most of these students scored better than Dubya would have.[/quote]

[quote name='camoor'][quote name='javeryh']Most high school students are dumbasses.[/quote]

Most (51%) of Americans are dumbasses. Look in the whitehouse if you don't believe me.[/quote]

What do either of these have to do with the discussion about high school students....

answer=nothing.[/quote]

So naive, I blame "no child left behind".

However, I guess ignorance is bliss...[/quote]


Yes, you are right. Not a single dem supported the measure and this nations youth were 100% enrolled in MENSA, then this Act came along and they all became retarded. :roll:

Hello, I'm from reality. Where do you live???
[/quote]

You're inferring that "no child left behind" was a bipartisan bill and that students were better off after it was enacted? Sounds like somebody's been sniffing too much elmer's glue...[/quote]

I never said that. You are still not comprehending reality. What I think about the bill has nothing to do with it, so I won't go in that direction. You said that the topic is completely to be blamed on NCLB and that everyone who doesn't believe as you do (making them ignorant) is wrong. That is wholely erroneous! There is no way that children were way intelligent, then the bill was passed and they suddenly, in mass, became stupid. That is your "arguement!" Look at the people you quoted! Then you said that you blame it all on NCLB! That is saying that before they were not so stupid, but now they suddenly became so! I never stated my opinion, and you have no right telling me what I was inferring or believing. But you're statements say exactly what I am talking about. The NCLB Act did not make our youth stupid!

My point (and msdmoney's) has not been to argue one side or the other, but to say that a few of you are talking about the wrong thing in the wrong forum. So if you (camoor) and Mr Bad Example want to start a thread devoted to your hatred of someone, something, whatever, go do it. But stop your thread crapping. Your posts have nothing to do with the "study." I don't have to read your thread, but I was wanting to hear a healthy discussion on the topic, and you are making it hard to do so.[/quote]

First of all, you started the accusations. The "NCLB" comment was a joke, but I see it went way over your head. Yes, the NCLB is a bad act of law. No, it did not directly cause HS students to place less importance on their constitutinal-guaranteed civil rights.

Second, I do not hate, I am just pointing to some of the culprits responsible for this sad finding.

This topic was about the decreased importance high schoolers attribute to civil rights, and it is my theory that this is directly related to the Bush campaign of fear. The Bush administration played off of people's fears (drummed into their heads by seeing the plane crash into the building over and over and over) by grabbing more governmental power (Patriot act) and misleading the people into unwittingly adopting the neocon agenda (relating WMDs/unrelated terrorist groups to the Iraq war). These HS students are just ceding more power into the hands of a very secretive, power-hungry, "we know best" government because of their fear of terrorism and ignorance of the rest of the world (the ignorance can be partially blamed on education, especially when things like creationism are being taught as science in schools...).[/quote]
He started it!!! waaaaaaaaa!!!! :baby: Actually, if you want to be a childish baby, first you called Americans dumb (accusation), then you called Bush dumb (accusation), then a good-intentioned person tries to steer the thread back on topic and you call him ignorant (accusation) and say that the NCLBA caused stupidity throughout America (accusation). I hadn't even said anything at this point! So then I just was a little sarcastic and said that what you're "reasoning" was is not an accurate arguement (that's not an accusation, just a fact - as you would probably agree, seeing as you are no longer standing behind it and have now said that it was a joke). Then you say something to me about what I believe, which cannot even be found in what I said (another accusation). That's when I finally let loose.

Point 2: NCLBA was a joke? Why defend it then until you see that it is a falacy, and retract? Not even a point to address.

Finally, you address something that could possibly be a semi-valid point, but your lack of rationale up to this point doesn't lend you any credibility in someone trying to have a civilized conversation with you from here on out.

Let's stop the off-topic bomb throwing and let's stay on topic and be civilized, people.
 
[quote name='MorPhiend'][quote name='camoor'][quote name='MorPhiend'][quote name='camoor'][quote name='MorPhiend'][quote name='camoor'][quote name='msdmoney'][quote name='MrBadExample']What's truly sad is that most of these students scored better than Dubya would have.[/quote]

[quote name='camoor'][quote name='javeryh']Most high school students are dumbasses.[/quote]

Most (51%) of Americans are dumbasses. Look in the whitehouse if you don't believe me.[/quote]

What do either of these have to do with the discussion about high school students....

answer=nothing.[/quote]

So naive, I blame "no child left behind".

However, I guess ignorance is bliss...[/quote]


Yes, you are right. Not a single dem supported the measure and this nations youth were 100% enrolled in MENSA, then this Act came along and they all became retarded. :roll:

Hello, I'm from reality. Where do you live???
[/quote]

You're inferring that "no child left behind" was a bipartisan bill and that students were better off after it was enacted? Sounds like somebody's been sniffing too much elmer's glue...[/quote]

I never said that. You are still not comprehending reality. What I think about the bill has nothing to do with it, so I won't go in that direction. You said that the topic is completely to be blamed on NCLB and that everyone who doesn't believe as you do (making them ignorant) is wrong. That is wholely erroneous! There is no way that children were way intelligent, then the bill was passed and they suddenly, in mass, became stupid. That is your "arguement!" Look at the people you quoted! Then you said that you blame it all on NCLB! That is saying that before they were not so stupid, but now they suddenly became so! I never stated my opinion, and you have no right telling me what I was inferring or believing. But you're statements say exactly what I am talking about. The NCLB Act did not make our youth stupid!

My point (and msdmoney's) has not been to argue one side or the other, but to say that a few of you are talking about the wrong thing in the wrong forum. So if you (camoor) and Mr Bad Example want to start a thread devoted to your hatred of someone, something, whatever, go do it. But stop your thread crapping. Your posts have nothing to do with the "study." I don't have to read your thread, but I was wanting to hear a healthy discussion on the topic, and you are making it hard to do so.[/quote]



First of all, you started the accusations. The "NCLB" comment was a joke, but I see it went way over your head. Yes, the NCLB is a bad act of law. No, it did not directly cause HS students to place less importance on their constitutinal-guaranteed civil rights.

Second, I do not hate, I am just pointing to some of the culprits responsible for this sad finding.

This topic was about the decreased importance high schoolers attribute to civil rights, and it is my theory that this is directly related to the Bush campaign of fear. The Bush administration played off of people's fears (drummed into their heads by seeing the plane crash into the building over and over and over) by grabbing more governmental power (Patriot act) and misleading the people into unwittingly adopting the neocon agenda (relating WMDs/unrelated terrorist groups to the Iraq war). These HS students are just ceding more power into the hands of a very secretive, power-hungry, "we know best" government because of their fear of terrorism and ignorance of the rest of the world (the ignorance can be partially blamed on education, especially when things like creationism are being taught as science in schools...).[/quote]
He started it!!! waaaaaaaaa!!!! :baby: Actually, if you want to be a childish baby, first you called Americans dumb (accusation), then you called Bush dumb (accusation), then a good-intentioned person tries to steer the thread back on topic and you call him ignorant (accusation) and say that the NCLBA caused stupidity throughout America (accusation). I hadn't even said anything at this point! So then I just was a little sarcastic and said that what you're "reasoning" was is not an accurate arguement (that's not an accusation, just a fact - as you would probably agree, seeing as you are no longer standing behind it and have now said that it was a joke). Then you say something to me about what I believe, which cannot even be found in what I said (another accusation). That's when I finally let loose.

Point 2: NCLBA was a joke? Why defend it then until you see that it is a falacy, and retract? Not even a point to address.

Finally, you address something that could possibly be a semi-valid point, but your lack of rationale up to this point doesn't lend you any credibility in someone trying to have a civilized conversation with you from here on out.

Let's stop the off-topic bomb throwing and let's stay on topic and be civilized, people.[/quote]

Thank you lord of the thread.

I'll continue to voice my opinion on the cause of this culture of fear and ignorance. It's my opinion, if you see it as an accusation, so be it. However this is the internet, so feel free to throw all the insults and useless whining at me that you have.

BTW, it was a joke. Take your own advice and get over it already (you'll catch the next one, you can do it! :wink: )
 
And while I too was making a joke, I also believe it's true that Bush would like more restrictions on the press since he has had fewer press conferences than any modern president and he refuses to answer any but the most softball question.

So to sum it up for you – students want restrictions on the media and I think Bush would agree.
 
High school students are a fickle bunch anyway (not that the rest of us aren't). I wonder what response you would get if you ask students "Would you rather have peace in the middle east....or a shiny new bicycle?" (substitute bicycle with more culturally and temporally appropriate item if you must).

myke.
 
Regardless or who is in power, whether they call themselves Republican or Democrat, Fascist or Communist, the concentration of power ultimately corrupts. Our founding fathers understood this and that is why they articulated the freedoms guaranteed to Americans in the Bill of Rights.

It does not matter what your political affiliation is (or isn't!!), we all have to be aware of the erosion of individual rights by the government or by those in power (megacorporations, megabanks, etc.).

Freedom of the press has to be guaranteed, as well as freedom of religion and freedom of assembly. It is just scary that some people of voting age would easily give up their constitutionally guaranteed rights (could you imagine the government inspecting and approving or censoring your internet blog!).

Our civil rights will not be eradicated in one day, but over the course of many years.
 
[quote name='tickdude']Regardless or who is in power, whether they call themselves Republican or Democrat, Fascist or Communist, the concentration of power ultimately corrupts. Our founding fathers understood this and that is why they articulated the freedoms guaranteed to Americans in the Bill of Rights.

It does not matter what your political affiliation is (or isn't!!), we all have to be aware of the erosion of individual rights by the government or by those in power (megacorporations, megabanks, etc.).

Freedom of the press has to be guaranteed, as well as freedom of religion and freedom of assembly. It is just scary that some people of voting age would easily give up their constitutionally guaranteed rights (could you imagine the government inspecting and approving or censoring your internet blog!).

Our civil rights will not be eradicated in one day, but over the course of many years.[/quote]

Well said, after all if you drop a frog in boiling water, he will hop out. If you put a frog in warm water and slowly dial up the tempurature, he will boil to death.

I was watching a show that explained scams - they set up a honeypot and found plenty of people on the street who were willing to give up their social security number or credit card number to a guy on the street in exchange for a chance to win a phony dream vacation to Hawaii.

If people are willing to give up something as personal, valuable, and easily understood as a credit card number in exchange for a chance to win a vacation, imagine how fast they will give up something they barely understand (their civil rights) so that Our Leader can "protect" them from terrorism.
 
bread's done
Back
Top