[quote name='RedvsBlue']You stated that these guys gave up their right to life when they decided to commit their crime of burglary, a property crime.
My argument is that if criminals should have to give up their right to life for a property crime like burglary then why shouldn't someone who engages in drunk driving (a crime that costs thousands of innocent people their lives every year) be expected to do the same thing?[/quote]
I never said that these irreverant crooks gave up their right to life. Do not tell me what I said unless you are quoting me.
If these people had been arrested by the police, and then shot by a citzen it would different. If they had not trespassed on private property then it would have been different. If they had not invaded someone else's home then it would have been different. In fact, there are too many differences to list.
This is not about drunk drivers, it is about a home invasion. If you want to defend these criminals for their actions, then defend their actions.
My argument is that if criminals should have to give up their right to life for a property crime like burglary then why shouldn't someone who engages in drunk driving (a crime that costs thousands of innocent people their lives every year) be expected to do the same thing?[/quote]
I never said that these irreverant crooks gave up their right to life. Do not tell me what I said unless you are quoting me.
If these people had been arrested by the police, and then shot by a citzen it would different. If they had not trespassed on private property then it would have been different. If they had not invaded someone else's home then it would have been different. In fact, there are too many differences to list.
This is not about drunk drivers, it is about a home invasion. If you want to defend these criminals for their actions, then defend their actions.