Xbox One on the way. DRM removed, more details to come.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I want a PR job trolling forums :(

Let's be honest, would that not be pretty epic? "Your mission, should you choose to accept it.... troll various gaming forums defending our product, and pointing toward flaws of our competitions product. Your pay will be $7.25 a hour to sit on your ass and read forums.... click yes or no, this email will self destruct in 30 seconds."
Yeah they call that astroturfing. Samsung admitted to doing it against HTC.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Quote from article "Sony has spoken about accessing your PS4 games on any machine"

Quote from me "appears to be limitless"

The word "appears" means my statement was subjective. Nice try though, those Microsoft dollars hard at work.



Ooook...

A lot of great info in that AMA. Thankfully it's not filled with some of these guys.

I'm excited hearing how integrated Kinect is and how much it is going to play in the experience. Really sounds awesome!
 
so why is it ok to bash xbox one in this info thread but if you say something bad about ps4 is ps4's thread you get jumped on lol it's lose lose on this site. it's like just because of ps4 sony is an angel yes i know this is video game website but sony makes more then video games and game systems. Out side of gaming sony is complete horse junk Their products are over priced and not that great quality. Same thing could be said about ms right now since gates left but when gates was their i loved ms and org xbox and start of 360 life. If these sony ass kissers really seen the junk sony has done in past outside of gaming they would bash them left and right also. 

 
for one sec if you think sony really cares about the "gamer" like they said at e3 you really are brainwashed people are like well they learned their lession from ps3 launch and now they want to do what is best for gamer. Guess what just like ms sony don't give a rats butt about you or your gaming hobby they just want your hard earned money. SO PLZ STOP ACTING LIKE SONY IS GOD!!!!

 
so why is it ok to bash xbox one in this info thread but if you say something bad about ps4 is ps4's thread you get jumped on lol it's lose lose on this site. it's like just because of ps4 sony is an angel yes i know this is video game website but sony makes more then video games and game systems. Out side of gaming sony is complete horse junk Their products are over priced and not that great quality. Same thing could be said about ms right now since gates left but when gates was their i loved ms and org xbox and start of 360 life. If these sony ass kissers really seen the junk sony has done in past outside of gaming they would bash them left and right also.
You seemed to like to go off on a tangent, timbo.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You seemed to like to go off on a tangent, timbo.
na it just makes me sic what people do and people wonder why companys like sony,ms,apple, do what they do. these big companys know suckers in this world when they hear things they want to hear they get all giddy and what not. Lets be honest if sony did what ms did at start with ps4 it would have been the "cool" thing to bash sony and love on ms.

i don't care if you outright hat ms and xbox one and just love sony and ps4 but for real don't call someone a idiot or other things just because they like a product that so happens to be the xbox one. at this point it's just getting crazy how much that goes on in this thread. If someone likes xbox one and supports it and says positive thing about it don't sit here and call them names or other things. Same thing goes with ps4 thread if someone says something they hate don't bash their opinion.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
na it just makes me sic what people do and people wonder why companys like sony,ms,apple, do what they do. these big companys know suckers in this world when they hear things they want to hear they get all giddy and what not. Lets be honest if sony did what ms did at start with ps4 it would have been the "cool" thing to bash sony and love on ms.

i don't care if you outright hat ms and xbox one and just love sony and ps4 but for real don't call someone a idiot or other things just because they like a product that so happens to be the xbox one. at this point it's just getting crazy how much that goes on in this thread. If someone likes xbox one and supports it and says positive thing about it don't sit here and call them names or other things. Same thing goes with ps4 thread if someone says something they hate don't bash their opinion.
Yeah you should practice what you preach. No point for you to bring your education background up. You only brought it up to try and show superiority over other posters, but that was exposed when you thought a GDDR and DDR is the same thing.

Sorry dude but it just looks like you have enough of your own medicine and is now trying to play the victim card, again.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Honestly, everyone should be paying attention to which console would have the better value for them instead of flying off the handle like most of you are doing.  Right now the main reason a lot of people are shifting over to the PS4 is because of the Kinect 2.0.  Its an extra piece of hardware that can break and considering the thing is required for the console to even operate you could be without a console for weeks depending on how long repairs would take.  If Microsoft would pull their heads out of their butts and realize that the hardware being mandatory won't increase quality of gimmicky gameplay and just remove the thing from the console package then it would even out everything in the console market.

 
Honestly, everyone should be paying attention to which console would have the better value for them instead of flying off the handle like most of you are doing. Right now the main reason a lot of people are shifting over to the PS4 is because of the Kinect 2.0. Its an extra piece of hardware that can break and considering the thing is required for the console to even operate you could be without a console for weeks depending on how long repairs would take. If Microsoft would pull their heads out of their butts and realize that the hardware being mandatory won't increase quality of gimmicky gameplay and just remove the thing from the console package then it would even out everything in the console market.
Look at you, all talking sense and stuff. There's no place for that here!

 
Honestly, everyone should be paying attention to which console would have the better value for them instead of flying off the handle like most of you are doing. Right now the main reason a lot of people are shifting over to the PS4 is because of the Kinect 2.0. Its an extra piece of hardware that can break and considering the thing is required for the console to even operate you could be without a console for weeks depending on how long repairs would take. If Microsoft would pull their heads out of their butts and realize that the hardware being mandatory won't increase quality of gimmicky gameplay and just remove the thing from the console package then it would even out everything in the console market.

The funny thing is, I mentioned the same thing pages ago, and as RiPPn mentioned, you make an intelligent post with no bias and it goes ignored. I also stated that I am buying an XBone now and discussed what games I am interested in. I also talked about the video WV Matsui posted with the FORZA 5 gameplay in it. However, no one replied. It's like the two of them would rather deflect the conversation to talk about Sony than rather actually talk about the XBone itself.

Nobody really seems to care about the PS4 here except you (WV Matsui) and Timbo. Your failed logic is that if someone says something critical of the XBone they must be Sony fanboys.

I have all 3 current generation consoles, and already have the WiiU, and will eventually get both the PS4 and the XBone, but that does not mean I don't have something to say about either one. It's not like they are holy grails that can't be touched and their developers can do no wrong. I think what caused the most outrage here is that people did not like what they were doing with the Xbox they've come to know and love, and not Sony fanboys ripping on it for that sake alone.

You can paint it all as Microsoft wanting to take us in a new direction, but not only did they fail to get that message across to its user base but some things just didn't add up, e.g. Major Nelson claiming you couldn't just reverse the 24 hour always on requirement and then they did just that, albeit with a firmware update.

I am glad with the majority of the changes they have made, however, I still can't figure out why they could not have kept the family plan going as to digital releases, and I still like to see the ability to disconnect the Kinect altogether. If you can already turn it off, why even have it required to be connected? Ok, I understand Microsoft wants us to have it to make extra money ($100) and so developers will incorporate it into games (hopefully as an option and not a requirement) but just don't force us to use it.

Other than that, that game video you posted the other day looks great. I am hoping that FORZA 6 video footage was actual gameplay as that looked amazing. Ryse looked good as well. I am not yet sold on Dead Rising 3, but have it in my Cart, along with Ryse and Forza, saved for later. Those are the three titles I would buy at or near release.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The "20 things you do not know about PS4" reveals more information. The 2 disc install is being done away with, in favor of a 1 disc offline install, and not 2.

The online is if Player A is logged into Console A, he can play his digital titles. If Player B uses Player A's login to log into Console B, he cannot play his titles, as Player A is playing them. (One console, one login)

For more info: http://www.reddit.com/r/PS4/comments/1i5sd7/its_official_the_ps4_allows_for_only_one_system/

Why we are discussing this here is beyond me, but hey, there's your information :)
Wow I missed that info. I expected it but it really sucks. I would have bought 2 PS4s, now I guess I'm just getting one. Damn.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
this topic = if you bash xbox one = omg we love you man you are great

support anything to do with xbox one = you are a dumb idiot that knows nothing and you have no credibility

it's like the other way around on ps4 pre order thread.

if you bash ps4 = you are a dumb idiot that knows nothing

if you suppoort ps4= you are a amazing person and you are smart.
You and WV just spout so much bs it's ridiculous. Ashane is imo pretty clearly supporting the Xbox and maybe he's just a fanboy I don't know, but he still uses his brain when posting and posts facts and actual arguments for the most part.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The funny thing is, I mentioned the same thing pages ago, and as RiPPn mentioned, you make an intelligent post with no bias and it goes ignored. However, no one replied. It's like the two of them would rather deflect the conversation to talk about Sony than rather actually talk about the XBone itself.
I replied to a few of your comments but I think thats when the arguing started and no one saw my post lol

http://www.cheapassgamer.com/topic/307549-xbox-one-on-the-way-drm-removed-more-details-to-come/page-224#entry10902316

 
Wow pages and pages of mostly useless stuff posted since last night and lol @Timbo trying to make made up claims about himself and his education. This is not meant to be an insult but merely observations. You have trouble stringing a basic proper sentence together and do not talk like a person with a background in electronics and overall just do not give off the impressions based on reading all of your posts over weeks that you have a high amount of education, as if you're a kid. So ya, I do not for one second believe your claims of a 3.9 GPA in a masters program. Just so no one thinks I'm slanted against you because of your views, if Ashane made those same claims I would believe him without a second thought.

A shame a couple of useful informative posts got lost in the mess last night.

So, that Xbox AMAA is still going on and hes uh.. saying some kinda informative things.

XboxOneDevConfirmed XB1 Dev[S] [score hidden]

1 hour
ago



As I mentioned earlier, I don't know what price point the Xbox One would be at without the Kinect, but it would be much less than 399.

I see it not as a market that no longer exists, but one that haven't been explored due to technological limitations.


A $299 or $349 Xbox One without Kinect? Yeah, that'll score like a home run to be honest.
Hearing that make me really think what the hell is MS thinking. They could sell the console for cheaper than the PS4 without the Kinect? Just release a non-Kinect version idiots. If they did that I think they would be guaranteed to win the next console war. If this is true and it would be cheaper I honestly think it'll just be a matter of time before they release the non-Kinect version.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yup exactly!

None of us know what these boxes are going to be like for quote some time I don't know how one can be declared the best before they are even out. None if us have played them.
Exactly. The only reason WV and I can declare the Xbox One the best is because we are so much better than everyone else. We are supreme beings!

 
just sad how much issues we have with people here we are supposed to be apart of the great CAG community but this forum topic has made the dirty side of people come out
Happens every time new consoles come out. People try to justify their purchases/and/or don't have enough money to buy (or in their minds, perhaps waste) money on new systems. Honestly, even $900 isn't a lot of money to purchase two new systems at launch when you consider inflation over the years and how much money people can dump into a solid PC. My groceries end up being over $220 every two weeks. Just live off that ramen for awhile!

What's even worst is once MS reversed their DRM stance it was a short lived praise. Now everyone harps on the $100 price tag difference and Kinect. I thought for awhile that getting rid of those two things would be a god send but I'm not sure anymore. Even with those gone I bet everyone starts bitching about the lack of power and how Microsoft doesn't have any Naughty Dog like developers. It's not a war MS can win pre-release, they just have to stick with what they have now and put more games in development.

 
You and I are of a like mind, sir. Right down to being bitterly disappointed that 1 vs. 100 went away. Still miss that.

I was just thinking about how each of the past several generations, my primary gaming console has come from a different company: Sega Genesis to Nintendo 64 to Playstation 2 to Xbox 360. (Maybe I should buy a Ouya :lol: ) I'd love it if MS does all the right things to keep me in the fold for this next gen, but brand loyalty doesn't go very far for me when it comes to gaming.
The X1 isn't the same "ecosystem" you're in. When people talk about ecosystems they refer to things like Android market purchases or iTunes purchases where you can buy a new device and use apps purchased on the previous device on it. With X1 the ecosystem isn't moving with the new console. It has an entirely new ecosystem.

Happens every time new consoles come out. People try to justify their purchases/and/or don't have enough money to buy (or in their minds, perhaps waste) money on new systems. Honestly, even $900 isn't a lot of money to purchase two new systems at launch when you consider inflation over the years and how much money people can dump into a solid PC. My groceries end up being over $220 every two weeks. Just live off that ramen for awhile!

What's even worst is once MS reversed their DRM stance it was a short lived praise. Now everyone harps on the $100 price tag difference and Kinect. I thought for awhile that getting rid of those two things would be a god send but I'm not sure anymore. Even with those gone I bet everyone starts bitching about the lack of power and how Microsoft doesn't have any Naughty Dog like developers. It's not a war MS can win pre-release, they just have to stick with what they have now and put more games in development.
Inflation has nothing to do with current prices. Electronics get cheaper and better over time, especially since they're being made by cheap Chinese labor. It's the same reason a board game you got for Christmas in 1985 cost $19.99 and despite inflation now costs 11.99. Same thing with clothing...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited by a moderator:
The X1 isn't the same "ecosystem" you're in. When people talk about ecosystems they refer to things like Android market purchases or iTunes purchases where you can buy a new device and use apps purchased on the previous device on it. With X1 the ecosystem isn't moving with the new console. It has an entirely new ecosystem.
Ummmm, OK. I mean, I don't disagree with you, but I'm not sure how my post from 227 pages ago has anything to do with the point you're making. It sounds like you're trying to correct an inappropriate use of the word "ecosystem" from me, but I didn't use the word in the post you quoted, and I wasn't talking about the Xbox ecosystem at all.

I'm not trying to be argumentative, or defend my earlier post or anything; I'm just confused.

 
So I assume this would include no difference in price either. Bummer for those wanting to go all digital thinking that it would save them money.
No mention of price was even given, nor was the quote in reference to anything about the actual product. Simply add on DLC.

Reaching pretty far in my opinion :)

However, since retail still factors into the equation, you would not see day 1 cheaper titles anyway. It was not until PC games got out of retail did we start to see fluctuation in day 1 prices, due to most manufactures not having to deal with CD, Box, Manual, Shipping, etc etc.

Of course, how fast we forget that Microsoft has had very good summer sales these past two years, plus a completely blockbuster black friday sale that beat out any other retailer for the entire year. Ahh.. memories... they flow like fish in the water.

 
Honestly, everyone should be paying attention to which console would have the better value for them instead of flying off the handle like most of you are doing. Right now the main reason a lot of people are shifting over to the PS4 is because of the Kinect 2.0. Its an extra piece of hardware that can break and considering the thing is required for the console to even operate you could be without a console for weeks depending on how long repairs would take. If Microsoft would pull their heads out of their butts and realize that the hardware being mandatory won't increase quality of gimmicky gameplay and just remove the thing from the console package then it would even out everything in the console market.
Exactly. 360 was my main console but I'm switching to PS4 for a host of reasons that make it a better fit for my gaming interests and values.

1. Kinect. I loathe motion controls and will never buy another console that has them built in as I don't want to support that trend or have to play games that get motion control and/or voice commands forced in since everyone has the peripheral.

2. $500 is just too much for a console for me. $400 for the PS4 is really pushing it too, especially since both console's launch lineups are nothing special. So I'm debating canceling the preorder and getting it after a price drop or bundle deal.

3. The DRM debacle. Yes it's gone. But they still tried it. And I don't trust them to not bring it back. I don't have much faith in MS as a company right now between that and the bad experience I had in fall 2011/winter 2012 with my account getting hacked and locked (see my blog posts here on CAG).

4. I love Halo and Gears, uit as a whole I'm pretty burnt out on shooters (and WRPGs). Thus I've been playing ps3 more lately. With better indie and Japanese developer support there's just more variety of games on Sony's machine. Moot for people who don't like those types of games and just want to play shooters, sports games etc. But it's a big benefit for those who do play more or who are looking for something different than the typical blockbuster bestsellers in the US

I certainly don't begrudge anyone who prefersMSs, western games and is going with the X1. As you note, we all just have to look at what they offer and decide which is he better fit for us, or whether we can justify owning both etc. No reason for all the juvenile bickering and insulting. We are all adults here as far as I know, so no reason we shouldn't be able to rationally discuss these machines and why we're buying the one(s) we are.
 
Not sure if it's a confirmed answer, but we finally did get some sort of answer about digital titles and the DLC's...

https://twitter.com/XboxP3/status/355418669918064640

@ReverendSlim No plans to have any difference in DLC offerings between digital and physical.



Seems to make sense. I think it would be a bad move to include dlc for digital games while the retail has to pay for it, or it is omitted.

Unless it's like a digital preorder bonus.
 
http://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2013/07/13/xbox-one-may-bring-back-family-sharing-and-other-lost-features/?partner=yahootix
 
No mention of price was even given, nor was the quote in reference to anything about the actual product. Simply add on DLC.

Reaching pretty far in my opinion :)

However, since retail still factors into the equation, you would not see day 1 cheaper titles anyway. It was not until PC games got out of retail did we start to see fluctuation in day 1 prices, due to most manufactures not having to deal with CD, Box, Manual, Shipping, etc etc.

Of course, how fast we forget that Microsoft has had very good summer sales these past two years, plus a completely blockbuster black friday sale that beat out any other retailer for the entire year. Ahh.. memories... they flow like fish in the water.
Not reaching at all. I said it was an assumption, and it was based upon the tweet that there would not be "any" difference. That's all.

 
Wow pages and pages of mostly useless stuff posted since last night and lol @Timbo trying to make made up claims about himself and his education. This is not meant to be an insult but merely observations. You have trouble stringing a basic proper sentence together and do not talk like a person with a background in electronics and overall just do not give off the impressions based on reading all of your posts over weeks that you have a high amount of education, as if you're a kid. So ya, I do not for one second believe your claims of a 3.9 GPA in a masters program. Just so no one thinks I'm slanted against you because of your views, if Ashane made those same claims I would believe him without a second thought.

A shame a couple of useful informative posts got lost in the mess last night.

Hearing that make me really think what the hell is MS thinking. They could sell the console for cheaper than the PS4 without the Kinect? Just release a non-Kinect version idiots. If they did that I think they would be guaranteed to win the next console war. If this is true and it would be cheaper I honestly think it'll just be a matter of time before they release the non-Kinect version.
lol i had no clue electronics field has tons of writing involved. The only classes i ever write things in is l.A classes .

When i type in things like this i don't even think about writting a 20 page paper and could careless if i make typing mistakes. I had no clue this was english class

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think those implying that there wont be a difference in multi-platform games are crazy. With the systems both being easy to develop for this time and having hardware so similar it would be a complete sign of negligence to not have the ps4 version running or looking better. 

The PS4 design is just better for graphics, plain and simple.

The Xbox 1 developer on reddit even admitted it yesterday.

"The facts are on paper, the PS4 has better specs and the most you can debate is by how much. What I can tell you is I have played Forza, Killer instinct, and Ryse on the Xbox One. They look as good as the games I play on a high end PC. Ryse reminded me of darksiders II."

For those implying dd3 vs gddr 5 doesnt make a difference here it is in AMD's own words.

http://www.amd.com/us/products/technologies/gddr5/Pages/gddr5.aspx#2

also for real world comparisons. AMD actually released some DDR3 and GDDR5 versions of its own cards 

Here are the results of its 2GB DDR3 AMD 7750 vs 1GB GDDR5 

IMG0039893.gif


http://www.hardware.fr/focus/76/amd-radeon-hd-7750-ddr3-test-cape-verde-etouffe.html

as you can tell the extra bandwidth provided by GDDR5 results in about an average of 30% more frames. Fact is latency is a non-factor in graphics performance, at least in relation to bandwidth.

Add this to the fact, that the PS4 gpu also easily outperforms the xbox 1 gpu, by about another 30-35% on average(and thats with giving a huge benefit to xbox gpu and a slight downgrade to the ps4 gpu in the comparison)

jbjWtrNek268rq.png


http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-radeon-hd-7790-review

BOTH ARE AMD APU's except one has GDDR 5, 18 compute units vs. 12, 32 ROPs vs. 16, really its no contest. 

Like Ive said before the PS4 version should always either run at a much higher frame rate/resolution or just plain look better if the developer chooses to lock both titles at a set framerate. And for those implying that developers will just go for the lowest common denominator, and make them the same, well theyre just ignoring all video game past. Fact is games dont exist in a bubble. Games have to compete with other games as well as first party. All it takes is that first one game to push the ps4 hardware and all it's competitors have to follow suite or else be left in the dust.

Now Im not implying the XB1 is another Wii U. That's far from the case. All im saying is that while both will be a major leap visually over what we have on the console market at the moment, the PS4 will go just a bit further visually, due to being close to 50% more powerful graphically.

Yet of course, it still all comes down to which system's library/culture interest you the most.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
lol i had no clue electronics field has tons of writing involved. The only classes i ever write things in is l.A classes .

When i type in things like this i don't even think about writting a 20 page paper and could careless if i make typing mistakes. I had no clue this was english class
Less people take you seriously if you type like you are an e-thug or illiterate, cause you look like you don't care enough to try to get your point across/just look stupid. Just saying, you know, maybe you should work on that.

 
I think those implying that there wont be a difference in multi-platform games are crazy. With the systems both being easy to develop for this time and having hardware so similar it would be a complete sign of negligence to not have the ps4 version running or looking better.

The PS4 design is just better for graphics, plain and simple.

The Xbox 1 developer on reddit even admitted it yesterday.

"The facts are on paper, the PS4 has better specs and the most you can debate is by how much. What I can tell you is I have played Forza, Killer instinct, and Ryse on the Xbox One. They look as good as the games I play on a high end PC. Ryse reminded me of darksiders II."

For those implying dd3 vs gddr 5 doesnt make a difference here it is in AMD's own words.

http://www.amd.com/us/products/technologies/gddr5/Pages/gddr5.aspx#2

also for real world comparisons. AMD actually released some DDR3 and GDDR5 versions of its own cards

Here are the results of its 2GB DDR3 AMD 7750 vs 1GB GDDR5

IMG0039893.gif


http://www.hardware.fr/focus/76/amd-radeon-hd-7750-ddr3-test-cape-verde-etouffe.html

as you can tell the extra bandwidth provided by GDDR5 results in about an average of 30% more frames. Fact is latency is a non-factor in graphics performance, at least in relation to bandwidth.

Add this to the fact, that the PS4 gpu also easily outperforms the xbox 1 gpu, by about another 30-35% on average(and thats with giving a huge benefit to xbox gpu and a slight downgrade to the ps4 gpu in the comparison)

jbjWtrNek268rq.png


http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-radeon-hd-7790-review

BOTH ARE AMD APU's except one has GDDR 5, 18 compute units vs. 12, 32 ROPs vs. 16, really its no contest.

Like Ive said before the PS4 version should always either run at a much higher frame rate/resolution or just plain look better if the developer chooses to lock both titles at a set framerate. And for those implying that developers will just go for the lowest common denominator, and make them the same, well theyre just ignoring all video game past. Fact is games dont exist in a bubble. Games have to compete with other games as well as first party. All it takes is that first one game to push the ps4 hardware and all it's competitors have to follow suite or else be left in the dust.

Now Im not implying the XB1 is another Wii U. That's far from the case. All im saying is that while both will be a major leap visually over what we have on the console market at the moment, the PS4 will go just a bit further visually, due to being close to 50% more powerful graphically.

Yet of course, it still all comes down to which system's library/culture interest you the most.
There's also tons and tons of answered questions here:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-face-to-face-with-mark-cerny

including:

Latency in GDDR5 isn't particularly higher than the latency in DDR3. Also, GPUs are designed to be extraordinarily latency tolerant so I can't imagine that being much of a factor.
But I can't wait to hear how development tools are going to overcome all these hardware limitations.

 
To the above two talking about latency, notice Cerny never gives a number? Not once? It's because GDDR has a higher latency than DDR, that's just a simple fact.

Now, in my earlier post (if you actually read it) you'll see I mention that it will not make as much of a difference for a graphics card, which Cerny also admits. However, he does not talk about how that relates to the CPU, does he?

Why? If GDDR was so good, we in the PC world would have been using it instead of DDR for years now in addition to the amount we have on our GPU's. Yet we do not. Ever wonder why?

Because Latency is the king factor there, *not* Speed. Which is the reason you have not heard anyone discuss the actual numbers on the latency of the GDDR5 on the PS4.

The ram will be a wash. The only true performance gain is in the GPU, which is a given. 

Also Edson, this is not like the PC. Games will not run at a "higher frame rate". Console games are V-sycned, to either 30 or 60 FPS. They will not go higher, regardless of if the GPU can handle it or not. (I.e. you cannot turn off Vsync like you can on a PC Game via options) Same with resolution, which is the same across both consoles. You are either shooting for 1080 or 720.

You might see some upscaling as well, again depending upon developer. In the end the spec sheet will only say so much. Right now, absolutely no one can say if one will look better then another 3 years down the road. Even developers are not saying that, and they are not saying that for a reason... nor should anyone with a bit of technical background.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Poor XBox fanboys.
yep im a xbox fanboy but have decided to get both systems at launch :bouncy:

till i see the games side by side i will not say every single game will look better on ps4 just because it has better hardware like people here. I for one had hands on time with both systems at e3 and yes i understand those are early builds, but i played couple ps4 and x1 games and i seen no diff in ps4 games over x1 games.

yes it's been said the things are like pc's, even if these things are pcs under the hood companys will still not just use pc programming for these games seeing unlike pc you don't have tons and tons of diff specs you have to program for. I would say in like 2-4 years we might see 3rd party companys use the gddr5 pretty well. I really don't think games like cod,ac,watchdogs will run any better on ps4 then on x1 mostly because they are making games for the first year or two for at least 5 systems if not six.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also Edson, this is not like the PC. Games will not run at a "higher frame rate". Console games are V-sycned, to either 30 or 60 FPS. They will not go higher, regardless of if the GPU can handle it or not. (I.e. you cannot turn off Vsync like you can on a PC Game via options) Same with resolution, which is the same across both consoles. You are either shooting for 1080 or 720.

You might see some upscaling as well, again depending upon developer. In the end the spec sheet will only say so much. Right now, absolutely no one can say if one will look better then another 3 years down the road. Even developers are not saying that, and they are not saying that for a reason... nor should anyone with a bit of technical background.
DING DING DING DING give this man the money right now

 
never gives a number?
So what's that official CPU speed again? Latency is a non-factor here. Bandwidth is the real key. Even with the semi-confirmed rumor of an upclock by MS, they're still on the losing side of the numbers. There's a reason MS is reacting to Sony by doing this if true. Not to mention total CUs.

If you wanna talk about latency, how's The Cloud supposed to overcame that issue to provide any kind of real computational advantage? Oh that's right it's PR nonsense to try to distract from the real hardware disadvantages. Any Cloud feature you'll see in the real world is already being done or can be done just as easily on other platforms using other available Cloud services.

With the systems both being easy to develop for this time and having hardware so similar it would be a complete sign of negligence to not have the ps4 version running or looking better.
Negligence isn't the only reason. Game industry politics is the only real and more likely reason any multi-platform games shouldn't look and/or perform better.

 
So what's that official CPU speed again? Latency is a non-factor here. Bandwidth is the real key. Even with the semi-confirmed rumor of an upclock by MS, they're still on the losing side of the numbers. There's a reason MS is reacting to Sony by doing this if true. Not to mention total CUs.

If you wanna talk about latency, how's The Cloud supposed to overcame that issue to provide any kind of real computational advantage? Oh that's right it's PR nonsense to try to distract from the real hardware disadvantages. Any Cloud feature you'll see in the real world is already being done or can be done just as easily on other platforms using other available Cloud services.
There's a reason they are not publishing certain numbers... anyone who thinks these consoles cannot be modified 3 months before release are kidding themselves ;) We all know about the 360 by now...

Latency is not a non factor. Latency directly matters to the CPU far more then speed. The GPU is another story, however if we are talking about total specs, why does Sony keep ignoring the latency question over and over again? It's because of Rule #1: Never admit anything bad about your console.

As to the Cloud, time will tell. I'm skeptical as well, mostly due to the Simcity fiasco, which is what the majority of PC users are basing their opinions on. My only suggestion would be to remember that these consoles are being designed for the future, not the now. Work around's to latency are among the top things being worked on right now across the cloud computing field.

 
On latency with the CPU. Isn't this cup a APU?

I've always heard those like speed more then anything when it comes to performance. Latency doesn't bother them as much an Intel chip. I could be wrong. It's been awhile since I've read up on the newer APUs.
 
If we are talking about multiplatform games only, yeah I agree we won't see much difference for 2-3 years. Lowest common denonminator won't be the Xbox One, it will be the PS3 and Xbox 360. Developers will be designing games revolving around the restrictions on current gen consoles.

1st Party games for PS4 compared to Xbox One's 1st Party games might be different in 2-3 years from now. The hardware for PS4 is much more powerful than Xbox One, no doubt about that. 1st Party studios won't be holding back from either side when it comes to demonstrating what their respective platform can do. I don't think we will see much difference though during the 1st year of the console launch, the current games in development were being made when the final hardware specs weren't available, so they probably are not utilizing the full hardware available in the final box.

I don't think graphics is that important to your average consumer or me personally anyways. As long as the game doesn't look like shit, I'm fine with innovative gameplay, and a variety of new IPs to choose from. Those who care about graphics would be better to just get a PC. But if Sony can do all that and provide better graphics, I won't complain. :D

Microsoft didn't invest all this money into the Xbox brand to lose this upcoming generation, competition from Sony can only make them fight harder to gain customers.

---- Edit ----

The Xbox One does have the better line-up of games I like so far compared to PS4. D4, Quantum Break, Forza MotorSport 5, Sunset Overdrive, and Titanfall. If it wasn't for the cheap ass in me, I would have bought a barebones Xbox One if it was available at launch. I couldn't get myself to pay extra for something I won't use, in this case the Kinect. Luckily most of the games I listed for X1 won't be coming out this year.

In for a PS4 at launch mainly due to PS+, remote play on Vita, and Killzone ShadowFall plus a few multiplatform games. Otherwise the 1st party exclusives announced so far for PS4 is lacking, hopefully Sony unveils some more at Gamescom.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I will say I haven't seen anything on 360 look as gorgeous as Last of Us, but how far down the line was that? Pretty much at the end. Nobody will care by then.

 
On latency with the CPU. Isn't this cup a APU?

I've always heard those like speed more then anything when it comes to performance. Latency doesn't bother them as much an Intel chip. I could be wrong. It's been awhile since I've read up on the newer APUs.
Yep it's a APU.... which is basically combing both CPU+GPU. (You know that, just explaining for those that do not :X) That specific APU should start appearing in laptop's as well, at a later date (Codename Kabini).

Regarding it, here's what AMD said for Llano specifically, as far as I know that has not changed...:

"Sharing memory like this is a mixed bag on a budget platform. Memory timings are very important. AMD told all reviewers not to exchange high frequency for loose timings. When looking for memory for your Llano-based desktop, shoot for the tightest latencies at the highest frequency you can afford. CAS latency 8 is the highest I’d recommend. In the initial review, we used DDR3-1866 with timings of 8-9-8-24. Those timings would be decent for DDR3-1600 too, but a bit tighter would be preferable."

http://www.overclockers.com/overclocking-amds-llano-apu/

...............

As I said, as far as I know that hasnt changed, and timings are still critical for APU's just like always. :)

 
I will say I haven't seen anything on 360 look as gorgeous as Last of Us, but how far down the line was that? Pretty much at the end. Nobody will care by then.
ps3 first party games blew 360 first party games out of the water no debate in that but i will say some 360 only games looked pretty dang good like gears of war 3

that's why im kind of sad to see this gen end in last year or two games on ps3 and 360 have looked pretty awsome. which is why even if these next gen systems are pretty powerfull i think it will take couple years for most game makers to take full advantage of the new systems power.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If we are talking about multiplatform games only, yeah I agree we won't see much difference for 2-3 years. Lowest common denonminator won't be the Xbox One, it will be the PS3 and Xbox 360. Developers will be designing games revolving around the restrictions on current gen consoles.
This just in, HTZ works Eurogamer! ;)

Kidding.... I say that because just today, EG released a DigitalFoundry article that basically says that very same thing:

"We suspect that detail and performance levels will be reduced, and that the underlying AI and other computationally intensive subsystems may be simplified to accommodate the ambitious design on much weaker 360, PS3 and Wii U hardware. Quite how much this will affect the gameplay is hard to say, but it makes you wonder just how long will this "cross-gen" period of games development endure, and at what cost? If the current-gen versions are "good enough" and financially successful as a result, will the need to service the older hardware actively hold back developers from making true next-gen games? We will be watching closely over the next couple of years with this thought in mind."

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-watch-dogs-on-ps4-tech-analysis

 
If we are talking about multiplatform games only, yeah I agree we won't see much difference for 2-3 years. Lowest common denonminator won't be the Xbox One, it will be the PS3 and Xbox 360. Developers will be designing games revolving around the restrictions on current gen consoles.
This just in, HTZ works Eurogamer! ;)

Kidding.... I say that because just today, EG released a DigitalFoundry article that basically says that very same thing
Credit actually goes to Timbo. :cool:

I really don't think games like cod,ac,watchdogs will run any better on ps4 then on x1 mostly because they are making games for the first year or two for at least 5 systems if not six.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To the above two talking about latency, notice Cerny never gives a number? Not once? It's because GDDR has a higher latency than DDR, that's just a simple fact.

Now, in my earlier post (if you actually read it) you'll see I mention that it will not make as much of a difference for a graphics card, which Cerny also admits. However, he does not talk about how that relates to the CPU, does he?

Why? If GDDR was so good, we in the PC world would have been using it instead of DDR for years now in addition to the amount we have on our GPU's. Yet we do not. Ever wonder why?

Because Latency is the king factor there, *not* Speed. Which is the reason you have not heard anyone discuss the actual numbers on the latency of the GDDR5 on the PS4.

The ram will be a wash. The only true performance gain is in the GPU, which is a given.

Also Edson, this is not like the PC. Games will not run at a "higher frame rate". Console games are V-sycned, to either 30 or 60 FPS. They will not go higher, regardless of if the GPU can handle it or not. (I.e. you cannot turn off Vsync like you can on a PC Game via options) Same with resolution, which is the same across both consoles. You are either shooting for 1080 or 720.

You might see some upscaling as well, again depending upon developer. In the end the spec sheet will only say so much. Right now, absolutely no one can say if one will look better then another 3 years down the road. Even developers are not saying that, and they are not saying that for a reason... nor should anyone with a bit of technical background.
console game absolutely do run at higher frame rates. Have you never read a DF article? Even if games sync to 30 or 60, then tend to drop frames all the time. Having the better gpu and more bandwidth means the ps4 version will run consistently smoother at a higher resolution. We saw this again this generation how many games were 640p, or how many games that were 1080 were actually 1280x1080 instead of 1920x1080? It happened all the time, ps3 and 360 multiplates shipped at different resolutions all the time. Same thing with AA, one version either had it or didnt, or they used different methods.

Also you keep on bringing up latency, but the cpu's do out of order execution.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
bread's done
Back
Top