[quote name='dohdough']What the

does this have to do with anything when we're talking about the US?[/QUOTE]
mykevermin was equating WASP-ishness with being a US citizen, which confused me immensely. The term WASP is a reference to ethnicity and religious association. It has nothing to do with nationality.
The issue of WASP is very significant when referring to Presidential elections. Before Obama was elected to office, there was only one other President to be elected to the office who WASN'T a WASP. That was John F. Kennedy. (who was Catholic, and thus not Protestant) For the longest time, it was believed that only WASPs could be elected to the Presidency.
With the election of President Obama, that trend has clearly ended. I imagine that in the future we are going to be seeing more ethnically and religiously diverse candidates for the Presidency. We can already see evidence of that in the current election, where neither candidate is Protestant. (or indeed even Christian)
A technicality? Seriously? So his mother being a US citizen automatically making him a US citizen is academic? Are you a birther?
Well, yes, actually. Having one parent be a US citizen does not automatically confer citizenship on the child. A close friend of mine had TWO parents who were born US citizens, and they had to apply for their child to have dual citizenship because she was born in Germany. (and by default, was a German citizen) By the laws of most countries, (including the US) being born within the borders of the country is the surest way to gain citizenship.
I say that President Obama's citizenship is a moot point because he is already President. Even if his citizenship status is brought into question at this time, there is no way to invalidate a Presidency that has already happened. The best his political opponents could do is try to prevent him from running for a second term.
It is just a detail that should have obviously been addressed by all parties involved much, much earlier.