[quote name='Vortextk']
I don't get that reasoning. They'd discontinue the codes, that they've had going for months and months and continue to support, because of one snafu? Remember, whenever the codes do run out or expire, amazon could stop it then, they still have not and by reports have made this latest batch the biggest number of codes yet. So then suddenly they'd stop the codes instead of, you know, try to fix it on their end or something? I don't care if you think it's wrong, that's fine, but that argument seems flawed at best.[/QUOTE]
I think probably you just didn't understand what I was saying. That's fine. If you'd read my posts in the thread you'd see that I don't think it's likely that Amazon would do anything about it. I'm extremely confident they won't. My point was, and is, that it's a matter of principle. Yes, Amazon probably won't discontinue codes over something which in the grand scheme of things is very minor. But not every glitch people exploit is minor, and not every retailer has the ability of Amazon to absorb the loss of profit. If it's accepted that people can game the system whenever they want, eventually that will lead to a situation where a retailer does pull the plug on a program because of it. And if that happens, even the people who weren't acting in their own selfish interest would be harmed by it. I've not demanded that anyone stop double dipping ECA codes, people can do whatever they want. My point is that gloating about what great "deals" they're getting seems a little much, and is irksome to some who choose to play by the rules.
If you went to a store and you paid with a $10 and they gave you change for a $20 by mistake, you might very well keep it rationalizing it as "hey, they screwed up, not me." That doesn't make it right.