[quote name='Jedi1979']keep in mind that i was trying to go by date joined and feedback so in my mind 5 or less would be towards the bottom of the list...[/quote]
I understand this mentality and since it's your list you have every right to do it this way, but I feel that post order and much higher amounts of feedback should still be taken into account.
I've only been a member here for about 14 months, but of the list in the OP, I have more feedback than anyone, and twice as much as the person closest behind me. While join date is clearly an important part of making the list, it does seem slightly unfair to me that as the seventh reply in the thread, I can be much further down on the list (13th) than someone like Layd Daly who has over 60 less feedback than me and posted two pages later, yet is 5th on the list simply because of join date.
I realize that joining CAG earlier should certainly factor in, but if feedback is truly such a big part of your consideration, I do feel that the list should reflect that.
Again, it's your list and I'm happy to be included at all so I won't say anything beyond this post and won't complain if the list doesn't change, but I do think that people such as myself who are clearly trustworthy and posted earlier in the thread should get some benefit.
Just my two cents.