[quote name='gunm']The whole controversy just makes Aaron's record all the more immortal.[/QUOTE]
Meh, he had almost 4000 more at bats than Ruth. But, then again, who cares? At some point, you're inevtiably making a distinction based upon conjecture. Who's to say that Hank Aaron, born thirty years later, wouldn't have been just as juiced as Jose Canseco?
Comparing eras of baseball is as pointless as it is moronic. Just as Aaron had many more at bats than Ruth, he played in a time where baseball had changed to the point of becoming unrecognizable. His record, therefore, isn't so much immortal as it is inextricably tied to the time in which it was set. In short, it's not the record one remembers, but the period it represents.